Will

@will-rich.bsky.social

EM macro watcher

Food costs are going to be more challenging in the next 5y Climate change is the most obvious driver Climate policy will pressure cheap livestock alongside higherwelfare standards Growing labour costs in Asia and a lack of productivity gains in African agri Higher rates also impactful

Eventually China's property market in aggregate will stabilise and return to growth At that point much of the problem of global imbalances will recede There's a very good chance that any protectionist response from the EU/ US will COINCIDENTALLY look very effective

I keep being fed Gary Stevenson content by the algos and it's got me wondering He claims to have been betting on inequality getting worse for 15y and making great returns from it How *do you* structure a trade that is long inequality?

There's stories that Andy Burnham will increase international aid spending from the current 0.2% of GDP to 0.7% of GDP If he does it will be one of the best uses of money the UK does and he should be incredibly proud of what it means

specifically, the part where the proceeds are remitted "according to their population". It's devolution without the upside: what local authority is going to bother investing in local growth when their portion of the local tax revenue remains the same regardless of how much money they raise?

The chronic and the catastrophic Fighting every small forest fire (chronic risk) prevents regular small scale fires Dead brush accumulates without the chronic events which turns manageable hazards into a rare but total megafire (catastrophic risk)

You'd struggle to capture the worldview of anti-growth ideologues better in a single paragraph than this UK political advisors are a different breed

Bild

On face value two of Burnham's core proposals are in conflict * allow more revenue to be retained locally * more investment for the north There's ways both of the following _can_ be true but I'd like to hear more about Burnham's plan to make it so

Bild
George Eaton@georgeeaton.bsky.social · last mo.

Good to hear Burnham champion often overlooked London devolution – London currently keeps just 7% of the tax revenue it generates, compared to 50% in New York and 70% in Tokyo.

India green energy transition heading in the right direction? Indian solar power generation is up c.40% y/y Wind power generation up c.20% y/y Coal production and imports down c.10% y/y and c.12% y/y

31% of men and 19% of women have negative returns to their UG degrees 40% of student loans have a negative return for the chancellor This is significantly related to subject choice From the IFS: 'New estimates of the impact of undergraduate degrees on lifetime earnings'

BildBildBild

Supply is not the reason that you cannot expand housebuilding Construction wages are falling off a cliff and are negative -3.5% in real terms Look at brick production at somewhere like Ibstock, they say capacity utilisation is at c.65% (and falling..)

BildBildBild

'Big' projects in the UK are low value because of regulatory burdens and planning uncertainty We can keep trying new ones and the bang for buck will continue to be terrible with a small number of exceptions

Bild

The bad news is that this keeps happening and there's clearly something seriously wrong with the ONS The good news is that nobody trusts the survey data anymore and generally lean on admin data instead UK statistics agency admits fresh error over key jobs data - www.ft.com/content/137b... via @FT

UK statistics agency admits fresh error over key jobs data

ONS warns of ‘level of reduced quality’, in setback to efforts to restore confidence in closely watched figures

ft.com

Detractors of large projects in the UK rarely bother saying that the projects are bad They prefer to say that they're a distraction for the government even if the projects are financed and operated by the private sector Just how bad do they think state capacity is that they can't even manage that?