Ye Sun

@yesuncomm.bsky.social

"And I believe it is essential for a science that aims to contribute to society to maintain a healthy culture of public scientific criticism."

Daniel Lakens@lakens.bsky.social · 2mo ago

New blog post: Evaluating Dr. Cuddy’s Claim that the Debunking of Power Posing is a Myth. daniellakens.blogspot.com/2026/05/eval... On an AI generated description of a non-existent study, incorrectly citing findings from studies, and the importance of scientific criticism.

"Science is not simply a sequence of tasks that can be optimized....The scientific system thrives on inefficiency: redundant efforts, failed attempts, and divergent paths. These are not costs to be eliminated but sources of discovery." Excellent essay! ⬇️ www.science.org/doi/10.1126/...

Progression without progress

Progress in the use of artificial intelligence (AI) to advance scientific discovery has made it increasingly realistic to envision automated “end-to-end science” (ETES) systems: integrated pipelines t...

science.org

The "Standard Error error," which confuses SE and SD in computing effect sizes, is not uncommon, unfortunately. I've noticed those when re-analyzing some meta-analyses. It's actually easy for a meta-analyst to avoid such errors-- when an ES looks a bit too big to be true, re-examine your analysis.

Bild
Ian Hussey@ianhussey.mmmdata.io · last yr.

If researchers find Cohen’s d = 8, no they didn’t. (probably.) Thoughts on the distribution of Cohen's d values in psychology and why we should think about their plausibility when reading articles.

"Reform is hard partly because we have to reform everything at once—what good is it to train students to do better science when better science won’t be rewarded? Are we just setting them up to exit academia?" I struggle with this a lot and sometimes feel like a drag on their career.

Richard McElreath 🐈‍⬛@rmcelreath.bsky.social · last yr.

How can we reform science? I have some ideas. But I am not sure you’ll like them, because they don’t promise much. elevanth.org/blog/2025/07...

Indeed, when rigorous evidence of error is provided, especially for a meta-analysis (which tends to get cited more and carry more influence), it is enough to warrant attention-- Timely damage control is important.

Ian Hussey@ianhussey.mmmdata.io · last yr.

I am often told that public critique of published articles must also solve the issues found. I think this frequently enforced requirement hinders scientific self-correction. Blog post: mmmdata.io/posts/2025/0...