Andrew Robertson

@akhrobertson.bsky.social

BC Cancer medical physicist, working dad, and North Van housing advocate Candidate for North Vancouver City Council Learn more at northvandrew.ca

I’d like to see development incentives for tree retention. Like a living space bonus for projects that keep mature trees. It would offset the cost of protecting trees during development, and encourage tree retention early in the design process

Love this! And not just cause they put the SeaBus in the announcement like we already know the answer ⛴️🏆

Vision Zero Vancouver@visionzerovancouver.ca · 3mo ago

Today, with our friends @visionzeroottawa.bsky.social & @visionzerokh.bsky.social, we're launching a contest to find Canada's Best Commute! There will be community votes! Prizes! And great discussions for all. See details and enter your submission: visionzerovancouver.ca/2026/01/14/c...

Many North Vancouverites worry that our current housing system won’t give them any future in our community, let alone an affordable one So finding alternative pathways to create new homes in our community is exactly what we need Local leaders must get serious about exploring ideas like these

Better North Shore@betternorthshore.bsky.social · 3mo ago

Is it possible to create a home on the North Shore that would sell for $350,000? Yes! Here's how: #northvan#affordable#housing www.betternorthshore.ca/blog/a-home-...

CNV GO Zone Improvement #1: Incentivize the right designs Surprisingly, re-legalizing 4-floor heritage style buildings by increasing floor space ratio and floor count limits can help multiplexes fit better into our neighbourhoods Let’s compare two ground oriented building styles to see how (1/9)

BildBildBildBild

Ending the disillusionment allowing society’s greatest challenges to go unchecked requires giving the next generation hope! But our housing crisis is doing the opposite Another great video from @pwaldkirch.bsky.social lays it out plainly and once again perfectly captures how I feel — thank you!

Peter Waldkirch 華彼德@pwaldkirch.bsky.social · 3mo ago

I wanted to take a moment to say a few things as directly as I could. Wanting to legalize apartments in the West Side of Vancouver isn't radical. A status quo built on exclusion is. If we want to move the needle at all, we'll need councillors committed to big ideas and real change.

Holding back blanket up-zoning for fear of giving developers increases in land values… 1) Is unsupported by evidence (below) 2) Maintains scarcity of developable land 3) Upholds a status quo where development is only accessible to those with deep pockets, not existing families in your community

Bryn Davidson - Lanefab@lanefab.com · 3mo ago

Citywide incremental up-zoning doesn't inflate land values. * I'm not saying this downward price trend is related to zoning, it's more about macro economics, but there are certain folks who argue that up-zoning is the source of our affordability problem, and they are just wrong

Sadly, local opposition to new schools in Metro Vancouver isn’t just confined to Olympic Village This article describes how City of North Vancouver is scaling back sidewalks and crosswalks next to a new school to instead prioritize the use of public property for parking by the school’s neighbours

betternorthshore.ca

Glad to see funding agencies holding municipalities to account for not doing their part to enable more housing. While the City of North Vancouver’s HAF Action Plan proposes multiplexes of up to 8 homes per lot, our new multiplex zone only allows up to 6 😕

Dr. Mike P. Moffatt@mikepmoffatt.bsky.social · 4mo ago

Markham just lost $7.36 million of their $58.8M (12.5%) federal Housing Accelerator funding for violating their requirement to legalize fourplexes. Not massive, but honestly, a bigger cut than I thought it would be.

Brodie: “eventually people will notice how their neighbourhoods have changed for the worse” We already have! Our friends/family have been priced out! 💔 It’s why polls show gentle density and multiplexes are BC’s preferred form of growth, and likely why Richmond’s shown “little public reaction”

Jens von Bergmann@jensvb.bsky.social · 6mo ago

Brodie: "I believe that this heralds the death of the single-family neighbourhood." This is how Richmond population changed in this time on council: High-density Greenfield/brownfield development (with sub-par urbanism) and single family stasis or decline. doodles.mountainmath.ca/html/yvr_pop...

Thank you @pwaldkirch.bsky.social for stepping up for Vancouver. This inspiring video describes so well how I feel (plus I always love a good boat reference)

Peter Waldkirch 華彼德@pwaldkirch.bsky.social · 6mo ago

I've spent years fighting for homes and a more affordable, equitable Vancouver. Now I want to take that fight to City Hall as your councillor. Go to www.PeterForCouncil.ca and join OneCity so you can support Peter For Council and help me get on the ballot! youtu.be/-d7WFFoqb0c

I've seen quite a few people sneer at voters' "ignorance" for identifying the federal government as the primary culprit in Canada's housing mess. While I probably wouldn't answer "federal", it's not unreasonable. Here's why:

Bild

Great to see articles that acknowledge that policies from ALL levels of government have helped cause our housing shortage Too often governments point blame at each other when they aren’t themselves doing everything they can to fix this mess

A decade-by-decade look at why and when housing became unaffordable — The Globe and Mail

Zoning restrictions, land-use rules, monetary policy and population growth were key drivers in affordability

apple.news

Just 11% of homes in the City of North Vancouver are missing middle housing types. This is a result of municipal policies that contribute to our housing shortage This video explains why I support expanding CNV’s multiplex zoning to enable more balanced and inclusive growth in our community