Dr Alison Diaper

@alisondiaper.bsky.social

Interested in psychiatry/psychotropics, psychopharmacology, neuro. I may seem inactive, but perhaps I'm a prodrug...? Here for research news, cat pics, comedy, and #TheArchers. Sigh ok I admit it, I'm mainly here for the #TheArchers. CPsychol CSci AFBPsS

Unpopular opinion (!) but I think I can understand Tom's reaction. Yes, it could be that he has awful ownership/entitlement issues. However, I think he thought, that despite everything, he still had a special profound connection with Kirsty. He now knows Kirsty does not feel the same. 😬 #TheArchers

I'm 100% with Keira about not wanting the limelight. It's not easy to avoid in my line of work and it means I'll never get promotion, but it's just not the way I'm made. I'm slightly disappointed she relented and agreed to it, but also it'll make a nice Grundy moment at the show. #TheArchers

Astonishing. Just a thought, but perhaps publishers should pay peer reviewers for their time and expertise, rather than expecting free labour. I know, silly me. Or, maybe this never went near peer review. I spent hours recently reviewing a manuscript for Scientific Reports. Did I waste my time...?

Feral T. Robot, Oil Swamp Utility Bot #7629@feralrobots.bsky.social · 10mo ago

Hey @nature.com, have you got an explanation for how the hell THIS happened? & especially why you accepted a paper with such a bizarre piece of genAI slop in it?! & more to the point, why we should take you seriously at all going forward? www.nature.com/articles/s41...

Figure 1 from a paper published in Nature (linked in post). The figure purports to be an infographic depiction of the "Overall working of the framework" for 'explainably' diagnosing autism spectrum disorder. The infographic is plainly nonsense, containing many spelling errors, nonsense words, meaningless images and graphs. Clearly created using generative AI and (crucially) NEVER CHECKED AT ANY STEP OF THE WRITING OR PUBLICATION PROCESS.