Amos Toh

@amostoh.bsky.social

senior counsel, Brennan Center for Justice. interested in all the ways money in tech helps and hurts. he/him, 🇸🇬 in 🇺🇸

My latest for @brennancenter.org on why the Trump admin’s moves on AI and cybersecurity confound rather than clarify. Ban on foreign access to Claude’s most advanced models underscores the challenges of governing when the admin’s instincts are anti-regulatory: www.brennancenter.org/our-work/ana...

Trump’s Chaotic AI and Cybersecurity Policy

The administration’s gutting of agencies, contradictory impulses on regulating AI, and susceptibility to outside interests undermine trust in its capacity to oversee artificial intelligence risks.

brennancenter.org

It is now crystal clear who is obstructing reauthorization. Cornyn & other reform opponents would rather see Sec. 702 expire than allow reforms to protect Americans’ privacy. Sen. Wyden offered an easy path forward for extending the law. Reform opponents would prefer sunset. 2/2

Senator Cornyn just blocked a 9-month extension of Section 702 with a warrant requirement for backdoor searches. He then blocked a 5-week extension with no warrant requirement, just basic transparency measures. 1/2

The risks of military AI "are already existential," says @amostoh.bsky.social -- "both for civilians swept up in the violence and destruction of AI-enabled wars and troops that have to live with the consequences of potentially unsafe weapons they can’t control.” theintercept.com/2026/05/01/e...

Musk Warns of Killer AI — While He and the Rest of Silicon Valley Cash In on AI That Kills

In his lawsuit against OpenAI, Elon Musk evoked a “Terminator” scenario. He said nothing about the people AI is already killing.

theintercept.com

What happens when the US military races to implement AI in war? I spoke with @amostoh.bsky.social, senior counsel at the @brennancenter.org, about what really goes on in these massive, secretive US military-tech contracts. Listen to the conversation here: www.themaybe.org/podcast/comp...

Computer Says Kill: A License for Unlimited War w/ Amos Toh

Who’s in control of calling the shots on AI in war— the military or the tech companies that they’re licensing their tech from?

themaybe.org

@theinformation.com just revealed key details of Google’s deal with the Pentagon to deploy Gemini in warfare. Charlie Bullock and I explain how loopholes in the deal pave the way for Gemini’s use in mass domestic surveillance and fully autonomous weapons - Google’s supposed red lines.

Bild
The Information@theinformation.com · 3mo ago

Exclusive: Google and the Department of Defense signed a deal allowing the Pentagon to use Google’s AI models on classified work. More details: https://thein.fo/3QAoTp2

Glad to see you quoted @amostoh.bsky.social, but there shd be more emphasis on the fact that the tech elites placing the bets worked hard to make them pay off. It's not just a bet, it was an aim, enaced with millions of $s in lobbying & shaping policy over a decade. www.cambridge.org/core/journal...

From blitzkrieg to blitzscaling: Assessing the impact of venture capital dynamics on military norms | Finance and Society | Cambridge Core

From blitzkrieg to blitzscaling: Assessing the impact of venture capital dynamics on military norms

cambridge.org

Amos Toh@amostoh.bsky.social · 5mo ago

Illuminating story from @sheeraf.bsky.social @nytimes.com, situating the Iran war in Silicon Valley’s decade-long push to transform warfare. Who stands to lose the most when industry bets big on war? Civilians and taxpayers. @brennancenter.org explains why: www.brennancenter.org/our-work/res...

A clear-eyed rebuke of executive overreach and a decisive victory for the First Amendment. But the administration shows no signs of stopping its crusade against "woke AI," the data brokers' loophole is still wide open, and thousands are dying or displaced in an AI-fueled war. Where is Congress?

Justin Hendrix@justinhendrix.bsky.social · 4mo ago

"A federal judge in San Francisco blocked a Pentagon order Thursday labeling artificial intelligence company Anthropic a national security risk, saying officials had likely violated the law and retaliated against the firm for speaking publicly about how it wanted its technology to be used."

Great post, particularly around the concept of “decision.” Decision has been used to describe what computers do going back at least to Shannon? And now it’s slipping to suggest that if an LLM makes a “decision” then a human has not. But a human is still making a decision about how to decide.

Post nicht verfügbar.

This is an incredibly valuable report and I recommend everyone read it and get a primer on how far down the rabbit hole of AI warfare we've traveled so far.

Amos Toh@amostoh.bsky.social · 5mo ago

1/ As the US continues AI-enabled strikes on Iran, new @brennancenter.org research from @emileayoub.bsky.social and me examines how the military’s investments in the technology have been building to this moment. Congress must step up and reckon with AI’s dangers to life, liberty, and democracy 🧵:

Note how the AI "recommendations" are completely obscured with little to no ability to actually verify or trace their outputs. This is what we mean when we say the distinctions between DSS and AWS are superficial in practice, especially when operators are given seconds to approve.

OSINTRadar@osintradar.bsky.social · 5mo ago

🇺🇸⚡️🇮🇷— The Pentagon uses Palantir’s AI system, Maven, when planning strikes on Iran. Commanders select a target, the system suggests the best munitions, and a live feed shows the strike in real time.

As @amostoh.bsky.social and I explain in our new report, the military has been ramping up its adoption of AI, while oversight and safeguards have failed to keep up. But the Pentagon’s dispute with Anthropic has brought a grave threat into focus: using AI to pry into Americans’ private lives 🧵 1/

The Business of Military AI

The Pentagon has been spending tens of billions of dollars to adopt new technologies at breakneck speed. Without oversight and safeguards, military applications of artificial intelligence could jeopar...

brennancenter.org

1/ As the US continues AI-enabled strikes on Iran, new @brennancenter.org research from @emileayoub.bsky.social and me examines how the military’s investments in the technology have been building to this moment. Congress must step up and reckon with AI’s dangers to life, liberty, and democracy 🧵:

The Business of Military AI

The Pentagon has been spending tens of billions of dollars to adopt new technologies at breakneck speed. Without oversight and safeguards, military applications of artificial intelligence could jeopar...

brennancenter.org

In this Tech Policy piece, I criticize how framings of Anthropic’s & OpenAI’s negotiations with the US’s DoW overindex on myopic interpretations of human oversight, papering over what should be the real target of our scrutiny: that generative AI algorithms are a flawed and inaccurate technology.

Tech Policy Press@techpolicypress.bsky.social · 5mo ago

The expanding war in Iran brought to the fore questions about the role of technology in armed conflict, including the controversial use of new artificial intelligence technologies. Tech Policy Press invited perspectives from experts on what they are watching for as the situation unfolds.

The expanding war in Iran brought to the fore questions about the role of technology in armed conflict, including the controversial use of new artificial intelligence technologies. Tech Policy Press invited perspectives from experts on what they are watching for as the situation unfolds.

Key Questions on the Role of Technology in the Expanding Middle East War

Tech Policy Press asked experts working at the intersection of technology policy, security, and international affairs to share what they are watching.

buff.ly