Tom “T.M.” Wolf

@tomtmwolf.bsky.social

Director of Democracy Initiatives at the Brennan Center for Justice. Founder of the Historians Council on the Constitution. By night, I write. My novel SOUND (FSG/Faber) and more: tomtmwolf.com. Views my own.

Uefa says they have reason to believe that Trump, Joshua Kushner and Infantino hatched a corrupt scheme involving the privatization of Fifa, and they are suing for damages and the ouster of Infantino. They have issued an anti-spoliation letter today demanding preservation of documents..

Bild

In @slate.com, Reva Siegel examines how SCOTUS's birthright citizenship opinion shows how people outside the courts have long shaped the Constitution. She spotlights a key development: for the first time, the Court recognized Frederick Douglass as a framer. Historians helped the Court get there 🧵⬇️

The Supreme Court’s Biggest Case of the Term Shows Popular Constitutionalism in Action

The birthright citizenship case the Supreme Court just decided demonstrates how deep-rooted this practice is.

slate.com

In @slate.com, Reva Siegel examines how SCOTUS's birthright citizenship opinion shows how people outside the courts have long shaped the Constitution. She spotlights a key development: for the first time, the Court recognized Frederick Douglass as a framer. Historians helped the Court get there 🧵⬇️

The Supreme Court’s Biggest Case of the Term Shows Popular Constitutionalism in Action

The birthright citizenship case the Supreme Court just decided demonstrates how deep-rooted this practice is.

slate.com

the trick is that it's very hard to know what resistance is going to be effective in the moment. people are trying a lot of different things—Ice surveillance, disruptive protests, boycotts, writing senators, donating to politicians, donating to other orgs, less disruptive protests, voting,

Amy Coney Barrett just told Congress that it would be inappropriate to explain the reasoning behind the Court’s unreasoned shadow docket orders. As if unreasoned judicial orders are a thing. They are not. The reasoning is the whole point.

It's important to do what's Sam's doing here and parsing the law & Constitution, but we must keep in view the forest: This is a huge advance in the US's transition into a presidential dictatorship. It gives the dictator effective authority to cancel laws by firing those tasked with enforcing them.

Sam Bagenstos@sbagen.bsky.social · 4w ago

Article II of the Constitution gives the President the duty ("he shall") to "take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed." This is the opposite of that. Even if SCOTUS is right that he can fire agency heads for cause, SCOTUS didn't say he can shut down an agency created by Congress.

I don’t think people really understand how bad the OMB proposed rule is going to be for state and local govt. We’re talking about putting a full third of state budgets under the explicit control of Russ Vought. (1/2) www.bondbuyer.com/news/cities-...

Cities, states warn of credit impact from proposed federal grant rule

Discretionary termination of grants allowed under the rule would pose a particular risk, issuer advocates said.

bondbuyer.com