Donovan: But the government's position is that her statement is false? Witt: The false statement is where she says "I don't have any knowledge of said laptop." Donovan: And "said laptop" refers to a *hypothetical* laptop that you just testified about? Witt: Yes
Good gullibility test here. Why yes, AI is so computationally expensive that we need to build 5,000 data centers that each burn a rainforest and drain an estuary to do basic math. But also, AI is going to escape and run on your router, or something.
AI models may soon self-replicate without access to data centers, Anthropic warns reut.rs/4dUgiXd
Iran doesn’t need to DDoS attack Bluesky. All it needs to do is post is “what if a DoorDash driver got caught by a speed camera on the way to someone who was having a bad day of executive function”
Did you know that Lissachatina fulica is a species of Nine Inch Snail?
Trent Reznor Goes Trainamaxxing and launches the largest model train gauge yet: Nine Inch Rails
Trent Reznor Goes Trainamaxxing and launches the largest model train gauge yet: Nine Inch Rails
From the 13yo Trent Reznor makes model forests: Nine Inch Trails
I’m much more interested to the answer of this question in Spanish than I am English
I'm interested in seeing whether Trump's fight with the Pope will finally disrupt the Catholic/Evangelical conservative alliance?
Bunch of quotes of this are “well obviously this AI is good—we should do this, but not ChatGPT” The problem with that is that this specific improvement in image recognition would not exist without much of the consumption “wasted” on GPT. Doesn’t make GPT good; but you don’t get this without that
We could save soooo many lives but people are so caught up in their reactionary moral panic nonsense