Andreas Møller

@andreasmoller.dk

Top 99% software engineer. Girl dad and boy boss. CSS zealot. Co-founder of https://nordcraft.com

I think they actually do, but the question has to be asked right. Would you like to have one place where you change your address, and every service just automatically updates? Would you like to be able to easily see every website that knows you address, email, real name?

dame@dame.is · 6d ago

hard pill to swallow for atproto developers/creators: 99% of potential users either do not care about, value, understand, or want to “own their own data” i see so many apps/projects lead with this “value prop”, but it’s not an important or meaningful consideration for most people

The fact that this happened because of how words are translated to tokens is completely irrelevant. The example is completely valid, It showed people that while LLMs are being sold as super intelligent systems, they can failing the most basic tasks that even a small child could solve.

Liz Fong-Jones (方禮真)@lizthegrey.com · last wk.

it's fascinating how quickly the r's in strawberry discourse dropped off as soon as people just fucking conceded, no, you don't ask LLMs to think in letters, only tokens.

If you make websites for a living, stop what you're doing and read this research by @tammyeverts.com; it shows what many of us have been saying for a long time: even if there is such a thing as "fast enough", it's generally *much* faster than you are targeting: embrace.io/blog/research-co…

New research: The Core Web Vitals thresholds you trust might be wrong for your site

Core Web Vitals data from ten leading online retailers reveals that "good" for Google may not be good enough for your users or your business.

embrace.io

LLMs are not colleagues or tools. They are adversaries in never ending game of sabotage. If they sabotage you, they win, if you stop them you win. They don’t try to sabotage you all the time, then you would just stop using them. They are helpful 90% of the time so you lower your guard.

Andy Bell@bell.bz · 4w ago

"AI-assisted writing helps so many people write better". I have heard this line so many times. I find it deeply troubling. Most of the time people us AI to write, because they are lazy or simply dont value the readers time, but I think this is different.

Alex Suzuki@alexsuzuki.com · last mo.

"You're so arrogant to think AI-assisted writing is beneath you, it helps so many people write better". No. YOU are arrogant for assuming that *my time* isn't worth *your effort* of putting your own thoughts into words.

I agree with the basic sentiment, but in reality it is very impractical. Coding agents do lots of different tasks: research, planning, implementation and validation. Each has different levels of complexity. Research requires less intelligence than planning etc.

dax@thdxr.com · last mo.

i have low conviction on model routers - very open to changing my mind but this is a snapshot of my current thoughts - i don't think it's good to not be aware of what model you're using. coding with LLMs is a skill you develop and getting a feel for models is part of that 1/4

This is by far the most annoying Bluesky bug. Along with the one where being blocked by one account means you suddenly can’t see the rest of the conversation you were part of.