Andy Peet

@andypeet.bsky.social

Philosophy lecturer at Umeå University. Views those of a fleeting timeslice of myself. I also like climbing: https://www.instagram.com/andy.p33t?igsh=MWFsMXJ6cjAxaHdrbw== https://27crags.com/climbers/andrewpe/ascents

We have another PhD position opening at Umeå. This time with a connection to 'ethics in teacher education'. This can be construed broadly so projects in e.g. social epistemology (like trust and testimony) likely count as long as there is a clear connection to ethics and education. Ad posted below:

Getting Reddit ads for Mensa. Not sure whether to be complemented that the algorithm thinks I'm smart, or insulted that it thinks I'm the sort of weirdo who cares about their IQ (I have a staggeringly low IQ btw).

We're hiring at Umeå. The position is full professor - but don't be intimidated by the professor title - you don't have to be fancy to apply. I'd say anyone with a potentially tenureable CV has a shot (obviously fanciness is a bonus). Area is pretty open. For details see ad below:

People love to talk about "work-life balance," but what if the minute you stop working you enter a never-ending anxiety spiral that only ends when you start distracting yourself with work again? What then, wokescolds?

7 year old: Why are you biting your finger? Me: I don't know. 7 Year old: Did you not know you were doing it? Me: Yea I knew I was doing it. 7 year old: Daddy, that makes no sense. I think my child has been reading Anscombe.

We often venerate philosophical contributions that develop clear, systematic, and original arguments for their conclusions. Are there any recent examples of philosophical work that excels instead through creative and insightful synthesis of many different ideas?

Looking for logic textbook recommendations - self study for a smart masters student who has not done any logic before and just needs the basics. I used Tomassi as an undergrad this is about the right level, but too long and slow for these purposes. Any ideas?

I want to understand Kant well enough to be able to vaguely understand writers in the 'Post-Kantien European Tradition'. What should I read? (I tried just reading Kant - it didn't work - he says himself that he's a shit writer in need of a competent expositor).