Brett Karlan

@oldjerryfodor.bsky.social

Philosopher of cognitive science & (analytic) philosopher of technology @ Purdue. Gamer in academia (brave). brettkarlan.com

Being a parent is weird because so many of the other parents are in this strangely overt competition over whose baby is the biggest or the smartest. What these idiots don’t realize is that MY baby is the biggest and the smartest.

the trolley problem [the actual historical event where car companies conspired to kill public transport and turn the US into a necropetrocapitalist hellscape]

One interesting thing about reviewers from other disciplines is that they're much more likely to (a) say that some stylistic preference of theirs is, in fact, the only way the paper can be written, and should be changed immediately; but (b) are then more likely to recommend accept anyway lol

It's always the people who yell at you in the grad-school bar about how truly horrible it is that your buddy is taking a postdoc even though he already has a TT job lined up who then take a postdoc while already having a TT job lined up

What's very funny about the "liberal Bluesky" thing is that there's a lot of us wayyyy to the left of the average bluesky user who use this site just fine. Almost like fringe right wing bros specifically can't cut it in the marketplace of ideas unless a platform algorithmically rewards them...

Bold choice to demonstrate Thought Leadership by getting throttled by the character limit before finishing the word 'leadership.' The AI Space thanks you for your service.

IMPORTANT ANNOUNCEMENT: At my provost's suggestion, I have decided to recommit to being a Thought Leader in the AI Space. All posts here will now be about me Thought Leading in the AI Space. Please do NOT respond to my posts with jokes or "memes." This is now a VERY serious account, dedicated to LE-

One obvious area of slack that I wonder if people are exploiting: do you think people are submitting papers to more than one journal at a time? Of course you're not supposed to, but if you do, I can't imagine the punishment (no from two journals, reviewer/editors mad at you) outweigh benefits

One of the most striking ironies of the field of analytic philosophy is that you can literally work on anything and still do philosophy, but also actually if you want to get a good job, you need to publish in one of like 10 journals that only publish on like 4 topics each

My own Q&A advice is to start crying in the back third of your talk, well before questions start. That way, everyone will feel so bad for you that you don't even have to do the silly dance that is the philosophy Q&A, and you can go home and continue crying

In case any of y'all find yourselves at one of my talks in the future, I think the best question you could ask me is: "Your project [career/argument/etc] seems to have the momentum of a runaway freight train. How do you explain your success?"

Unless some math friend of mine wants to tell me they're actually bullshit, these (what seem like) genuine advances that LLMs are making recently are both (a) really impressive, and (b) put some pressure on those of us (including myself) who are skeptical of the cognitive capacities of these things