@annetomato50.bsky.social

Have Rowling and Navratilova threatened to destroy the NHS over anything else? Like poor maternity care? General poor staffing levels, waiting lists? Stuff that really does affect women?

Oh no. Next time I need to go into hospital, I’d better decline and instead suffer and perhaps die, as I don’t want to provoke JK Rowling and Martina Navratilova into obliterating the NHS due to my presence near some Terf.

@goodlawproject.org I take it you've seen this. How would you have a lawsuit? You would have to prove that someone was trans. How would you prove that? Would people harassed or even assaulted in toilets be able to take legal action against the perpetrators and their encouragers?

JK Rowling protecting women by destroying their access to healthcare. She doesn't give a fuck about women's health and safety. As to Navratilova, she can fuck away off and mind her own business.

The unhinged glee with which they're willing to go full Judge Dredd on anyone or any institution who disagrees with their poisonous world view is genuinely frightening. "Blow up universal healthcare for everyone because they aren't sufficiently persecuting 0.2% of society? 100% behind that m8."

It's as if they've pre-programmed a fortnight's worth of soundbites, novelty giveaways and gammony snack quips while they're off on their jollies - regardless of what emergencies the country is facing. It's a dereliction of duty. Meanwhile @greenparty.org.uk offer solutions, care and leadership.

Don't get your hopes up, but also don't give up on hope entirely. Sometimes we do make a difference. L.A. is not some Tennessee backwater, it's the second largest city in the country, in a state that's the world's 4th largest economy. This reversal is meaningful.

LAPD suspends use of Flock surveillance cameras over privacy issues

Privacy concerns led the LAPD to pause its use of Flock Safety’s license plate surveillance cameras. The company has been criticized for allowing federal and national agencies to access its data.

latimes.com

The original clip posted on X excludes the woman saying “it’s a range of things that is also rape” and Manivannan saying “none of which is less or more worse” - and instead just includes them saying “it’s a spectrum”. Extremely misleading. Misinformation really.

The original clipped post is full of comments saying versions of “oh well this is what would you get when we import people from other cultures” and racist stuff of that sort, which you’d think would give our parliamentarians some pause.

BildBildBildBild

I just cannot understand an interpretation of this interview that sees it as making light of rape or excusing it. Making out that this is what Manivannan is arguing for strikes me as exceptionally reckless.

Like sorry can we be clear that what’s happened here is that a Green MSP did an interview a year ago where they made the point that lots of different acts constitute rape, and now a bunch of Scottish Labour MSPs are sharing a doctored clip of this claiming it’s rape apologism.

So a majority of respondents to the hidden 2019 UK government survey on variations in sex characteristics did not consent to treatments. These treatments include hormonal interventions, removal of gonads, genital reconstruction, dilation, chest reconstruction, and hysterectomy.

Graph labelled figure 6.2: The types of medical interventions or procedures that respondents had undergone due to having variations in sex characteristics. A bar chart shows the following results. Hormonal interventions (pills/injections/creams) - 68%. Removal of gonads - 32%. Vaginal/labial/clitoral reconstruction shaping or changes - 31%. Dilation - 19%. Penal/scrotal reconstruction shaping or changes - 18%. Orchiopexy/orchidopexy (surgery to move undescended testicles into the scrotum - 10%. Chest reconstruction/shaping - 8%. Hysterectomy - 8%. Other - 15%. I have had medical interventions but can't remember what they are - 10%.

19% of people diagnosed with variations of sex characteristics in the hidden 2019 UK government report were first subject to medical procedures at less than 2 years of age. These procedures were often associated with negative impacts on mental health, social life, views of healthcare providers etc

Respondents with VSC


Of respondents who were willing to disclose information on medical interventions or procedures they had undergone due to having VSC, nearly a fifth (19%) had undergone their first when they were under 2 years old. 

Respondents were more than twice as likely to report that they had had a negative experience than positive experience of aftercare (50% and 18% respectively).

When asked how to describe how medical interventions or procedures had affected them, respondents mentioned: 

    negative impact on mental health 
    negative social impact, discomfort and unease with their bodies 
    distrust and negative views of healthcare profession or professionals 
    negative side effects 
    positive effects of medical interventions or procedures

Respondents who care for someone with VSC

Of carer respondents who were willing to disclose information about medical interventions or procedure their child or person they look after has undergone because of having VSC: 

    66% reported that, at the time of their first medical intervention or procedure, their child or the person they look after was aged 0 to 2 years old

    overall, 83% reported the first medical intervention or procedure taking place under the age of 18 years

I'm seeing a lot of people invoke the figure of the intersex person in current discourse on sex and gender, especially in relation to the UK government's anti-trans segregation regime. But the actual voices of actual people are getting lost. This buried report offers vital evidence to counter that.

Mitch Travis@profmitchtravis.bsky.social · 21h ago

A few weeks ago, after a 7 year delay, the UK government quietly dropped the results of their 2019 Call for Evidence on variations in sex characteristics The results are striking but will of course seem deeply familiar to anyone working in this field. www.gov.uk/government/c...

So the data suggests that whilst 3 in 10 are diagnosed in adulthood, the majority of intersex people only *find out* in adulthood. So a huge chunk of people who are diagnosed as a child but not told until they are older/otherwise find out. I wonder how many never know!

Wonder if the transphobes will be up in arms about evidence of invasive surgeires and treatments on minors who can't consent in these documents? (We knew it was happening but good to have some numbers) It seems like they are only mad when its consensual and with the advice of multiple Drs + more 🤔

Two examples of language that will upset the Gender Conservatives: 1. it describes biological Variations in SD rather than Disorders & 2. It doesn't assert a strict binary into which each VSD is placed but talks of the reality of biological spectrum, rather than GC's pet 'gamete potential' fixation