Tessera
Folgen

Ashutosh Ghildiyal

@ashutoshg.bsky.social

Chef at The Scholarly Kitchen | Scholarly Publishing | VP, Growth and Strategy at Integra

95 Posts258 Follower430 Folgt
Peer Review Congress #PRC11 Coming 2029!@peerreviewcongress.bsky.social · 7d ago

#PeerReview should evaluate not if a paper is the final word but what it establishes, what is uncertain, & whether its reasoning & evidence are sound, transparent, & defensible enough to support further examination @ashutoshg.bsky.social @scholarlykitchen.bsky.social @peerreviewweek.bsky.social

Society for Scholarly Publishing@scholarlypub.bsky.social · 7d ago

Rethinking Scholarly Evaluation: Matching Rigor to Purpose - The Scholarly Kitchen

The Scholarly Kitchen@scholarlykitchen.bsky.social · last wk.

Ask the Chefs: Peer Review Capacity — Uncomfortable Truths and Overlooked Conversations scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/09/14/a...

Ask the Chefs: Peer Review Capacity — Uncomfortable Truths and Overlooked Conversations - The Scholarly Kitchen

For Peer Review Week 2026, we asked the Chefs two questions: What is one uncomfortable truth about peer review that the scholarly publishing community doesn’t talk about enough? And, beyond recruiting...

scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org

Ashutosh Ghildiyal@ashutoshg.bsky.social · last mo.

AI can help with the mechanics of content, but not with its soul. Often, when we discuss writing, we focus on mechanics. Mechanics have their place, but their importance is limited. Now it can be handled by AI. We therefore need to focus on what matters more - the interiority from which it emerges.

Ashutosh Ghildiyal@ashutoshg.bsky.social · last mo.

This misconception that writing is thinking seems to be so ingrained in academia that it is almost beyond questioning, but is it really so. Why, dont you think and then write? It is not that writing ia thinking. It is that we think in words. But what happens even before we think is more important.

Andrea Mann@andreamann.bsky.social · last mo.

"By writing, you are literally firing up your brain and therefore stirring up your conscious thoughts and something new emerges. You are not, or at least not always, transcribing something already present in your conscious thoughts.“ LOVE this piece. www.historians.org/perspectives...

Society for Scholarly Publishing@scholarlypub.bsky.social · last mo.

Reading Between the Lines, Part 2: Cognitive Debt and the Adaptive Publisher - The Scholarly Kitchen

Reading Between the Lines, Part 2: Cognitive Debt and the Adaptive Publisher - The Scholarly Kitchen

The central risk of AI in scholarly publishing is therefore not hallucination but cognitive debt: the gradual erosion of the human capacities that give scholarship its originality, integrity, and meaning.

scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org

The Scholarly Kitchen@scholarlykitchen.bsky.social · last mo.

Reading Between the Lines, Part 2: Cognitive Debt and the Adaptive Publisher scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/08/13/r...

Reading Between the Lines, Part 2: Cognitive Debt and the Adaptive Publisher - The Scholarly Kitchen

The central risk of AI in scholarly publishing is therefore not hallucination but cognitive debt: the gradual erosion of the human capacities that give scholarship its originality, integrity, and mean...

scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org

Ashutosh Ghildiyal@ashutoshg.bsky.social · last mo.

Part 2 is out today in @scholarlykitchen.bsky.social Exercising non-mechanical cognitive capacities to direct and govern the mechanical cognitive work leads to cognitive coherence whereas delegating the non-mechanical cognitive work to AI leads to cognitive debt over time. #AcademicSky

Reading Between the Lines, Part 2: Cognitive Debt and the Adaptive Publisher - The Scholarly Kitchen

The central risk of AI in scholarly publishing is therefore not hallucination but cognitive debt: the gradual erosion of the human capacities that give scholarship its originality, integrity, and mean...

scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org

Ashutosh Ghildiyal@ashutoshg.bsky.social · last mo.

As AI becomes increasingly capable of processing knowledge and producing thought, the value of human scholarship will depend increasingly on our ability to engage directly, discover, discern, and form independent judgment. #AcademicSky #ScientificPublishing @scholarlykitchen.bsky.social

Reading Between the Lines, Part 1: A Cognitive Framework for AI in Scholarly Publishing - The Scholarly Kitchen

AI is now a permanent feature of the scholarly landscape. The question is no longer whether it should be used, but how it should be understood and governed.

scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org

Peer Review Congress #PRC11 Coming 2029!@peerreviewcongress.bsky.social · last mo.

The Cognitive Responsibility Framework offers a practical vocabulary for deciding where AI can extend human cognition and where human responsibility must remain primary within the work and workflows of scholarly publishing. @ashutoshg.bsky.social @scholarlykitchen.bsky.social

Society for Scholarly Publishing@scholarlypub.bsky.social · last mo.

Reading Between the Lines, Part 1: A Cognitive Framework for AI in Scholarly Publishing - The Scholarly Kitchen