Barry Norton 🌈 ♾ 📚

@barrynorton.bsky.social

He/him. I write queer/speculative fiction, with ND representation, in Denmark. PhD in Computer Science, MA in Creative Writing, BEng in Software Engineering, MSc in Science Communication in progress.

When you complain about 'the plagiarism machine' by reproducing someone's writing (screenshotting from behind a paywall, denying them compensation for their labour) without attribution, and only begrudgingly give attribution when people ask. Still, 'fair use', right?

Not what I wanted to wake up to this morning: (Dame Professor) Uta Frith opining about 'mis/over-diagnosis' of #autism on BBC Radio 4 Today. At least they challenged her with other voices (see below), but I doubt they're going to interview anyone else tomorrow because the BBC *love* UCL.

Challenging misinformation about autism: using evidence to correct false claims

Dr Judith Brown is Head of Autism Knowledge and Expertise at the National Autistic Society. In this blog, she shares the latest evidence and research about autism to challenge misinformation in the ne...

autism.org.uk

What I don't like about the revisionist bsky origin story is the idea that as the userbase broke into five digits, we queer and neurospicy folks, with niche sexual interests, drove away the tech people. We are tech people. Have you met tech people? Actual ones, not just your idea of 'tech bros'.

The funny thing is that in democracies with royal families, criticism of them is far safer than of presidents in republics. King Charles III has a pædophile brother and Epstein trafficked children for him. Crown Princess Mette-Marit's son is a rapist, and she lied about her friendship with Epstein

Will Stancil@whstancil.bsky.social · 2d ago

The nice thing about living in a democracy is that our leaders aren’t kings and you can be rude to them if they deserve it

Insulting someone is not, in itself, ‘an ad hominem’. Staying on topic and advancing the argument by logic or fact, while also incidentally insulting someone, is not trying to win ad hominem. It might be rude, but it’s not trying to win an argument by being rude. You’re making a modal fallacy.

"DOJ said when it presented the case to a grand jury, it was 'not in possession of any information from DOI indicating that any damage to the Reflecting Pool was caused by anything other than the actions of the defendant and other vandals who damaged the pool’s lining.'" Best justification ever...

Trump administration drops Reflecting Pool case, blaming damage on ‘botched’ installation

The Justice Department said “it is difficult to attribute the widespread damage to the Reflecting Pool to vandalism, let alone to establish that fact beyond a reasonable doubt.”

nbcnews.com

Second guessing myself on this (and removing it from a thread where it's likely not welcome). I think what one has to consider with respect to LLMs, given that much of their power is down to language, is to what degree natural languages are creations (not utterances in them or writing, to be clear).

Barry Norton 🌈 ♾ 📚@barrynorton.bsky.social · last wk.

Only somewhat, I'd say (as an AI researcher): network architectures, training algorithms and inference algorithms are. And the machinery of information retrieval and prompting in general. Also hardware acceleration. Most of the emergent capabilities are discovery, though, not creativity.