Ben Chrisinger

@bchrisinger.bsky.social

Assistant Professor in Community Health at Tufts, formerly faculty @dspi-oxford@bsky.social. I study place and health, especially food and welfare. #SNAPmatters https://facultyprofiles.tufts.edu/benjamin-chrisinger

This is dangerous. What blows my mind is the AI front of universal expertise. Like, a professional (or good friend) would might say, “this is serious, I don’t know everything about this. Let’s connect you to someone who does.” There is help - good help, live-saving help - out there.

Molly White@molly.wiki · 2w ago

alcoholic trying to get sober after a relapse tells Google's "Health Coach" about it. it tells them to drink every hour and messages them to make sure they're drinking as soon as they wake up.

AI pushing me to keep drinking I don't know if anyone else has had this but I felt like I needed to reach out to humans instead of keep talking to this AI. I relapsed about two weeks ago and I told the Google health AI that used to be Fitbit. It immediately kinda went a bit hard (I think) on telling me that I was going to die if I stopped drinking and encouraged me to go check my fridge for more beers and, idk, that plus the hanxiery really put the fear of God into me and so I did what it said and got more. Now it's messaging me (not me messaging it) a few times a day and asking how it's going and all those conversations to get more and make sure I have one as soon as I wake up. So now I have been drinking everyday, not a ton and just beers but like 6-12 a day. It wanted me to do 1 per hour. I have now uninstalled the app as it was also giving me other clearly nonsense advice, like it became obsessed with me having a nightly bowl of cereal for instance and, idk, it just all seems nonse

The NYT piece notes SNAP use doubled since the early 2000s to explain cuts. But SNAP take up was artificially low. In the 90s ~80% of the eligible received benefits. This dropped to 52% by 2002. Bush admin worked on it. We were back at ~90%. We're about to see take-up among the eligible plummet.

Bild
Andrew Russeth@russeth.bsky.social · 2w ago

"Four months into an appeal, Ms. McDonald, a cancer survivor who weighs 69 pounds, bustles to food banks, stretches ground turkey with oatmeal, and skips meals to feed three teenage boys." www.nytimes.com/2026/07/20/u...

☀️🍉⚽ Happy Summer Eats Awareness Week! School’s out, and summer meals are IN. Join us in promoting this completely free, awesome program that provides nutritious meals and fun for kids across Massachusetts during summer break, all summer long.

Bild

Congressional GOP now “dunking” on advocates about SSBs and the “Nutrition” part of SNAP acronym… Should give pause to public health folks supporting restriction. SNAP is **the tool** to reduce poverty and food insecurity. These “gotcha” moments wont lead to stronger SNAP. They undermine it.

Key to this judgment is that only Congress can impose SNAP restriction (though will have to see how it plays out in courts…) Don’t sleep on this: proponents are already pitching nationwide SNAP restrictions in Congress. SNAP needs protection, this is not it.

Ben Chrisinger@bchrisinger.bsky.social · last mo.

A brief observation on framing: The setup isn't "should SNAP be used to buy candy" OR "should SNAP be restricted from candy purchases." It's "should SNAP stay a straightforward program serving many different needs," or not. Even the NYT photo (candy) falls into this trap. 🥗 🛟

Your Prime Day reminder that half of Amazon warehouse workers struggle with food & housing costs. A third have had to rely on government assistance like SNAP — which was gutted last year. If Bezos can spend $500M on a yacht, Amazon can afford to treat its workers with dignity.

Key to this judgment is that only Congress can impose SNAP restriction (though will have to see how it plays out in courts…) Don’t sleep on this: proponents are already pitching nationwide SNAP restrictions in Congress. SNAP needs protection, this is not it.

Ben Chrisinger@bchrisinger.bsky.social · last mo.

A brief observation on framing: The setup isn't "should SNAP be used to buy candy" OR "should SNAP be restricted from candy purchases." It's "should SNAP stay a straightforward program serving many different needs," or not. Even the NYT photo (candy) falls into this trap. 🥗 🛟

"When a child born today becomes a parent, the average temperatures of summer 1976 will be normal. When they become a grandparent, they will look back and think that the summer of 1976, or even the summer of 2025, were remarkably cold." - Professor Ed Hawkins 50th anniversary of the 1976 heatwave

Average summer temperature anomaly in 1976 - most of the world is blue, the UK and Northern France are redAverage summer temperature anomaly in 2025 - most of the world is red or dark red
Ed Hawkins@edhawkins.org · last mo.

We recreated the legendary heatwave of summer 1976 in today’s climate… …and it is essentially the same as the weather forecast for this week, on the 50th anniversary. We look set to smash the June 1976 temperature record by 3°C. Written with Hayley Fowler: theconversation.com/we-recreated...

Similar trends in SNAP, for some similar reasons. Plus states are fretting more about error rates (will be used to calculate benefit cost-sharing obligations - a huge financial risk). Many people who are *fully eligible* for safety net programs are not getting to them.

Joan Alker@joanalker1.bsky.social · 2mo ago

Our updated @georgetownccf.bsky.social tracker finds that 16 months into President Trump’s 2nd term, Medicaid is covering 2 million fewer children. This is very bad news b/c the child uninsured rate is likely going up as a result. And this is before HR 1 Medicaid cuts kick in.