Ben Cahill

@bencahill.bsky.social

Director, Energy Markets and Policy, CEESA, UT Austin. Energy, geopolitics, Middle East, transitions, methane, LNG, NOCs, running, cocktails.

Big expansion of U.S. sanctions on Russian oil exports, targeting producers, tanker owners, traders, OFS companies, and insurers. Will greatly increase the risk of doing business w/these entities. Bullish signal; Brent crude near $80/b today. www.bloomberg.com/news/article...

Why Biden’s Farewell Sanctions on Russian Oil Are a Big Deal

The US on Friday announced the most sweeping and aggressive sanctions yet on Russia’s oil trade, just ten days before Joe Biden leaves the White House to be replaced by Donald Trump as president.

bloomberg.com

ICYMI: short essays from 9 CSIS colleagues & affiliates on different elements of the DOE US #LNG study. I wrote about long-term global LNG demand, arguing that commercial risks are unavoidable, but it's best to let the market sort out which facilities are built. www.csis.org/analysis/exp...

Experts React: DOE LNG Study Highlights and Implications

The Department of Energy released its long-awaited study on U.S. liquified natural gas exports, offering a comprehensive update on economic and environmental analysis. Experts discuss key highlights a...

csis.org

How can the EU buy more US LNG? In the short term, EU companies could outbid other buyers for destination-flexible volumes (this happened in 2022-23 but only due to acute market pressure). Otherwise flows depend on lifting the "pause" which is already part of Trump's plan. www.ft.com/content/9e48...

Donald Trump tells EU to buy US oil and gas or face tariffs

US president-elect warns bloc that member states will face tariffs unless they make big purchases

ft.com

Imminent DOE LNG study: some surprising early findings in Granholm letter. 1. US #LNG exports could➡️30% rise in dom. gas prices. So far, gas supply has enabled ~11.4 Bcf/d LNG exports and ~6.1 Bcf/d pipeline exports to Mexico, + big HH price drop since 2016. (Cont'd) www.nytimes.com/2024/12/16/c...

‘Unfettered’ Gas Exports Would Harm U.S. Economy, Energy Secretary Warns

Jennifer Granholm said a new analysis showed that the continued pace of exports was “neither sustainable nor advisable.”

nytimes.com

No, the Biden administration did not ask the EU to loosen these regulations. The DOE and EPA asked the EU to begin considering "regulatory equivalence" for US exports. That will only happen if the EU judges that EPA regulations and IRA Waste Emissions Charge are equivalent to EU MRV rules. 1/2

Justin Mikulka@justinmikulka.bsky.social · 2y ago

If the EU has real regulations to require low associated methane emissions for the full life cycle for its imported LNG, the US can't qualify. The Biden admin has already asked Europe to loosen these regs. A parting gift to us from the Biden admin.

Reuters: draft Trump transition plans to cut EV tax incentives, weaken emissions standards, impose tariffs on "EV supply chain" components, but support critical minerals processing. Does this help the US auto sector or insulate it from competition & pressure to innovate? www.aol.com/news/exclusi...

Exclusive: Trump transition team plans sweeping rollback of Biden EV, emissions policies

Incoming U.S. President Donald Trump’s transition team is recommending sweeping changes to cut off support for electric vehicles and charging stations and to strengthen measures blocking cars, compone...

aol.com

New one from me on Trump's return and the implications for Gulf oil producers. A big push on Iran sanctions could create opportunities for the Saudis and others. But I'm not so sure they'll jump to backfill Iranian supply. #OPEC agsiw.org/trump-2-0-oi...

Trump 2.0: Oil Market Implications for the Gulf States

As Trump seeks to maximize U.S. oil and gas output and choke off Iran’s oil exports, he will have no qualms about leaning into oil market issues.

agsiw.org

The DOE US #LNG study could be out very soon. Here's what I'll be watching. 1. The conclusions on domestic gas prices. How much could a sharp increase in LNG exports drive up domestic gas prices? And how will domestic prices be linked to international gas market conditions? (Continued)

Bild

OPEC+ meeting on Sunday. They are likely to (for a third time) delay their plans to bring barrels back online, after years of deep production cuts. The focus is on compliance, since Iraq, Kazakhstan, and the UAE are producing above target. The US shale boom is still hard to handle for OPEC+.

Bild

Surprising no one, Trump's transition team is compiling an energy package that would 🚢 Approve new LNG export plants 🛢️ Boost oil drilling off the US coast & on federal land 🚗 Repeal tax credits for EV ⚡️ Remove clean power plant standards www.reuters.com/business/ene...

Exclusive: Trump prepares wide-ranging energy plan to boost gas exports, oil drilling, sources say

The package would approve export permits for new LNG projects and increase oil drilling off the U.S. coast and on federal lands.

reuters.com

"Drill, baby, drill" is at odds with current industry realities: capital discipline, the price environment, and the depletion of sweet spots outside the Permian Basin. That slogan is really shorthand for: deregulate and build more O&G infrastructure. Which is not as catchy!

Robinson Meyer@robinsonmeyer.bsky.social · 2y ago

“Hamm does argue that D.C. regulation stymies the day-to-day business of the oil and gas industry… But even a fully unleashed U.S. energy sector would struggle to overcome output declines from maturing shale fields.”

Quoted in this Washington Post story. Data centers, AI, and manufacturing mean significant load growth. Gas demand scenarios are changing. That makes it all the more important to cut emissions from U.S. gas production. It's a bad idea to roll back methane regulations! wapo.st/3CHeQHR

AI’s hunger for electric power is threatening U.S. climate goals

The enormous electricity needs of artificial intelligence are driving plans for scores of new fossil fuel plants with decades of expected service life.

wapo.st

Yes. I'm an oil and gas analyst with a strong interest in climate policy. I try to engage with oil & gas X and climate X. The algorithms really messed with visibility and engagement. But at least in my X feed, there is more diversity of views and even (sometimes!) dialogue.

Michael Wara@michaelwara.bsky.social · 2y ago

Does anybody else worry that this site is going to eliminate the bipartisan discussion on energy/climate/wildfire that used to happen on X? That’s the only reason I am still there. What I see is a bifurcation of two audiences that I want to talk with and that need to talk to each other.