Benjamin Thomas

@benjthomas.bsky.social

Political Ideologies, 20th Century Centre-Right, Neoliberalisms, Thought in Political Parties of UK & DE, Transnational discourses and the conjuncture benjaminjthomas.net

As the Burnham Government begins to unroll its planned strategy for governing, I return to one of my favourite historical documents, the 'Long Campaign' Paper from 1979, Strauss and Hoskyns' ten year plan for Thatcherism. It wasn't completely or faithfully delivered, but reflects the long term

Going into the Burnham Government, I've talked to a fair # of 'normal people' down pub about politics in the past few weeks. Of all the commentary on Manchesterism, the only person associated with a new government that really inspired enthusiasm was Mathew Lawrence.

This call for papers has a lot of good people involved and worth keeping an eye on/considering a submission. I'll admit that I'm a bit surprised by the interest in the US, given the organisers, but this should be very good on the German context.

Institut für Zeitgeschichte München−Berlin@leibniz-ifz.bsky.social · 3w ago

#CfP: Sind Konservatismus und Kapitalismus ziemlich beste Freunde? Das diskutiert eine Tagung des Arbeitskreises Interdisziplinäre Konservatismusforschung am #IfZ und der @lmu.de. Wer sich beteiligen will: Wir freuen uns über Vortragsvorschläge bis zum 10.8.: www.ifz-muenchen.de/aktuelles/ar...

Text "Call for Papers", darunter sind drei Seiten Papier abgebildet

My new article with @mihjournal.bsky.social is at long last in orbit. It explores how the neoliberal fantasy machine has used space colonisation to wish away the problem of environmental limits and revive the legitimation of private property.

A “Limitless Frontier”? Neoliberalism, Silicon Valley, and the Commercialization of Space | Modern Intellectual History | Cambridge Core

A “Limitless Frontier”? Neoliberalism, Silicon Valley, and the Commercialization of Space

cambridge.org

🧵 Progressives need to think much more ambitiously about citizenship: it can't only be a debate about the "who" - the boundaries of citizenship. Our new @ippr.org report today makes the case for a new politics of "democratic citizenship": www.ippr.org/articles/the...

The democratic citizen: Renewing citizenship and the public domain | IPPR

Often, this descends into little more than an argument about eligibility for welfare benefits. This is a disaster for progressives, who find themselves fig

ippr.org

We had an in-depth look at the misinformation targeting City of Sanctuary last summer. How it spread from the mainstream to the online far right, and how the charity was inundated with horrific threats. This is part of a worrying and growing trend. www.thebureauinvestigates.com/stories/2026...

How migrant charity City of Sanctuary was targeted by the far right

City of Sanctuary promotes compassion for asylum seekers and refugees. It has met a torrent of rightwing hate and misinformation

thebureauinvestigates.com

New article accepted: it'll be my first contribution to political history that goes beyond the right/centre-right and my most contemporary article, with the periodisation reaching into the 1990s (with clear links to the late 2020s).

Really interesting article from @thomaseason.bsky.social and @arturnadiiev.bsky.social on the role of the Churchill myth in Ukraine's strategic communications towards UK and the British reception thereof. Really cool to see that they interviewed one of Zelenskyy’s speechwriters.

Zelenskyy repeatedly drew on the Churchill and WWII narratives to render Ukraine’s situation intelligible to a British audience by embedding it within familiar narratives. In his first address to the UK Parliament, he declared: ‘We do not want to lose what we have, what is ours – Ukraine. Just as you did not want to lose your island when the Nazis were preparing to start the battle for your great power, the Battle for Britain’ (Zelenskyy, 8 March 2022). Here, he grounded Ukraine’s experience in one of Britain’s most enduring national myths – the story of standing alone against tyranny. He positioned Ukraine’s defence of its sovereignty as a contemporary counterpart to Britain’s wartime resistance, allowing UK audiences to make sense of Ukraine’s struggle through a familiar narrative story of the Battle of Britain.
Narratives such as this were used throughout all of Zelenskyy’s speeches to make sense of Ukraine’s wartime experience for his UK audience. For example, in Zelenskyy’s last speech analysed for this research project, he stated:
80 years ago, Manchester survived the Christmas Blitz. This spring, the whole of Ukraine survived the Easter Blitz. 80 years ago, the Nazis razed Coventry. This year, the Ruscists created dozens of new Coventries in Ukraine. These are Bucha, Irpin, Borodyanka, Kharkiv, Mariupol. (Zelenskyy, 25 October 2024)
Here, he used the Blitz to help the UK audience understand Ukraine’s wartime experience, explaining the suffering Ukraine is going through at the hands of Russia as similar to the suffering the United Kingdom endured during the Blitz. During the interview, our participant revealed that he read a book about the Blitz and personal stories of experiencing it, and, relatedly, Zelenskyy read a book about Churchill. He identified parallels between the United Kingdom then and Ukraine now and used them to inform his work, making sense of Ukraine’s current experience for the UK audience.
BJPIR@bjpir.bsky.social · 2mo ago

📣 Don't miss this #openaccess #BJPIR article! 'Invoking Churchill: Zelenskyy’s use of myth diplomacy in the United Kingdom' by @thomaseason.bsky.social & Artur Nadiiev 🔗 buff.ly/EUPIFw8 @polstudiesassoc.bsky.social

This Oxford Character Project looks exceptionally cursed and concerning. From the funders to the staffing to the transparent subtext, it's clearly in some continuity with the right-wing American 'civic centres'. I'd be fascinated to find out how it ended up in DPIR.

Unprompted by I wanted to share my thoughts on the Renewal x Tribune issue. It's a real mixed bag with some interesting contributions and some that are not well thought through. It's disappointing how many Labour people can't think of any policy levers beyond tax cuts to incentivise capital.

This is ahistorical nonsense playing to the gallery 🧵 British nuclear power stalled for multiple reasons such as technology (the AGR designed to replace Magnox was plagued by problems), ideology (the private sector isn’t good at delivering projects of this scale…

She had seemingly psychic powers, and correctly deduced that I was on my way back from a conference, without me revealing that. "I bet it was a load of old tosh, I can tell it was", she told me. I chose not to reveal that I had been the speaker, fearing that she was indeed psychic.

Never seen essential criteria like this on a job before, and frankly I don't know if it is really justified from what they set out, but it's a theology job and I'm sure human resources will have had a field day figuring it out.

Person specification
A. Essential:
1. Hold a degree at doctoral level in either Islamic Studies or Islamic Sciences, or in
Christian Theology;
2. Have an established record in published scholarly research commensurate with the
stage of their career, suitable to be considered as potentially eligible for inclusion in
any research excellence exercise in which the University of Oxford engages;
3. Have a commitment to the religious tradition to which they belong, and be an active
participant in their worshipping community;*
4. Have an appropriate familiarity with the Scriptures of their religious tradition.** These particular requirements form an Occupational Requirement under the Equality Act 2010
(Part 16, Schedule 9, Part 1) arising from the need to fulfil the academic duties of the post, which
include engagement in Christian-Muslim dialogue and assistance with a vocational programme for
the formation of Christian ministers.

I certainly hope this is some form of technical error - I chased in January and was assured by an administrator that it was out for review - but this absolutely sucks and an editor should have reached out by now.

05 October 2025 - Revised Manuscript Submitted
05 October 2025 - With Journal Administrator
06 October 2025 - With Editor
21 March 2026 - Out for Review

Is the Elections Bill up to the job? Guy Furlong argues that the bill is jumble of half-measures, reflecting a lack of any coherent theory of what's wrong with democracy, and of what a better democracy might look like: renewal.org.uk/blog/democra...

Democracy demands more than half-measures

Earlier this year, the government introduced the Representation of the People Bill (the Bill) into Parliament. Speaking for the government during the second reading debate in the House of Commons, Sec...

renewal.org.uk