Ben Schneider

@benmschneider.bsky.social

Research on work, job quality, and technology. Researcher @uio.no, Research Associate @camunicampop.bsky.social 🗽 in 🇳🇴 sites.google.com/view/benschneider

When something is so obviously a terrible idea, it is ok to just...say no thanks and ban it. We don't have to wait 15 years and then slowly ban if after a whole bunch of irreperable damage has been done to individuals and society.

Bild

We should not accept this framing. Universities are not businesses, they do not operate on the same principles. Universities have a social function distinct from profit-maximizing firms. They produce and disseminate knowledge, especially knowledge that is not produced by the private sector.

Robert Saunders@robertsaunders.bsky.social · last mo.

Intrigued to hear Danny Kruger, of Reform UK, tell Any Questions that universities need to "change their business model". What would he suggest? Selling crypto? Acting as "brand ambassadors" for Direct Bullion? Recording videos saying "Up the Ra"? Or getting a billionaire to chuck us £5 million?

Researchers at two Russell Group universities published scientific research funded by an "anonymous donation". But the money really came from an industry group with a clear conflict of interest 🥸 After 10 months of "investigation", Wiley has done... nothing. No retraction, no EOC, no correction.

Wiley Research Integrity
To: Sophie Hill
Jul 1 at 15:06
Dear Dr. Hill,
We regret the significant delays since our last message. We are working with the university and all other stakeholders to decide on an adequate solution to these concerns, and further delays have left this resolution hanging.
Unfortunately, we cannot provide more of a timeline for this resolution. We will however notify you once a decision has been reached.
Best wishes,
The Integrity Assurance & Case Resolution team
WILEY