This is massive. Massive. A barrister’s closing submission is supposed to tell the judge why the EVIDENCE and LAW win the case. Naomi Cunningham apparently decided to tell the judge to bring her “own moral compass” to it, branded evidence “morally repugnant”, and then..
JFC This is where the unhinged Ultra-terf activist-barrister Naomi Cunningham just blew the case for Sandie Peggie. Cunningham belongs in circa 1700, she has no right to emotionally blackmail a judge to be the same.
Ooo, this is awkward. Lynsay Watson's judicial review was stayed behind Sex Matters v NPCC. Sex Matters duly went off to court, lost its case - badly- and produced a High Court judgment. Now Watson's case is moving again, her arguments have formally been admitted, and the Judge specifically invited
A transgender person is shot dead. Graham Linehan looks at the people accused of the killing and publicly calls them “heroes” who “may have saved some kids.” Seventeen minutes later: “Many such cases.”
How Gender Criticalism has moved on from “We just have legitimate concerns” to cheering on those who killed a trans person.
Graham Linehan is calling the people who murdered a trans man in cold blood, heroes.
It's easy to think 'that's just Glinner, he's an extreme example' He is not. Many GCs believe the only good trans person is a dead trans person. All the ones quoted every day in the papers believe this. They're just better at hiding it from mainstream view than this ass wrench.
How Gender Criticalism has moved on from “We just have legitimate concerns” to cheering on those who killed a trans person.
All I can think of when I see him is an angry little drunk trying so hard to be tough and strong and masculine. He literally makes me sick to my stomach.
Zip-a-Dee-Doo-Dah, another tranche of data, cometh my way...By square and compass, naturally - all sacrifices necessary for the Greater Good.
Good People Phil Dunster
ALT: Good People Phil Dunster
static.klipy.com
Something is seriously fucking wrong when extemist activist Naomi Cunningham can stand in a Tribunal and make damaging allegations about Freda Wallace’s character, motives and conduct - while Freda isn’t a party, isn’t a witness and has NO opportunity to answer them.
Our courts and employment tribunals are now used as Colosseum's by showboating bigots to dehumanise trans witnesses. It's so bad, I expect many important, just cases will not be pursued by trans witnesses due to fear. Our courts not only acquiesce, but encourage it. They cannot be 'neutral' on this.
Colosseum of Rome, Italy
ALT: Colosseum of Rome, Italy
static.klipy.com
JFC 'ultra' terf barrister Naomi Cunningham trying to gaslight a judge that Naomi Cunningham speaks for the Supreme Court.
This is very important. Freda Wallace has been hung out to dry by activist lawyer Naomi Cunningham. Cunningham has relied, totally, on a massively curated and one-sided version of events, where the full timeline and context has been lost due to..
I hope things change soon. It's horrifying how quickly things turned around, and how quickly they're coming for everything else, AND how quickly liberals folded. Predictable, too, because the wise folks of the LGBT+ community have been warning us this coming and so few listened.
Gotta say: that a trans woman can be prosecuted for rape for not disclosing that she is trans is, for me, one of those "Burn it. Burn it all down" moments. It's a miscarriage of justice so grotesque there just aren't word for it.
I’ve now read the CPS consultation response on “deception as to sex”. And I am fucking furious. The CPS actually asked whether its approach properly balanced the rights of trans people to live fully in their acquired gender against the rights of complainants.
My god, SCOTUS acted within hours to clear the way for this execution and Tennessee completely botched it and tortured her. She's still alive. This barbaric practice needs to end. www.tennessean.com/story/news/c...
Court stays Christa Pike execution in Tennessee: Updates
Christa Pike was sentenced to death for the 1995 killing of 19-year-old Colleen Slemmer. A court stayed her lethal injection that was scheduled for Sept. 30.
tennessean.com
Learning to play along to this monster and finding someone made the most perfect video for it. Genuine watery eyes. youtu.be/MQNRKX8GwPo?...
Lynyrd Skynyrd - Free Bird
YouTube video by LynyrdSkynyrdVEVO
youtu.be
@pmarquisrcn.bsky.social @rcn.org.uk If the genital obsessed get their way, many ill trans people who need urgent care, will simply avoid hospital. Is it really possible to 'balance' the cruel demands of a regressive Evangelical ideology, against human dignity, illness and unnecessary deaths?
The death penalty is a moral abomination. State-sanctioned barbarism pushed by incompetent morons and sanctioned by the Supreme Court. Absolute ghoul shit. www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news...
@pmarquisrcn.bsky.social You and the @rcn.org.uk chose no side, but simply recognised the need for basic dignity and respect for natural human differences over a regressive, truly Medieval, horsehair shirt wearing hate-movement that belongs in the past. Thank you for standing up to these brutes
In the racist 'nurse' Sandie Peggie hearing, Director of the RCN England, Patricia Marquis, is being subjected to a grotesque and cowardly demonisation by the evangelical genital-obsessed hate-movement. It's quite extraordinary. Please offer her some support. @pmarquisrcn.bsky.social
Well, this just got interesting. The Court of Appeal says evidence of a police culture around NCHI's could, in principle, shed light on how alleged crimes are assessed - but said Lynsay Watson's evidence didn’t establish such a culture.
Disclose and maybe get killed by someone disgusted by the idea that they were attracted to a trans person Don't disclose and maybe go to jail to be beaten and raped The logic is straightforward
There is NO responsibility upon a complainant to establish whether their partner is trans. So they don’t have to ask. But our silence can potentially become the “deception”. What a fucking grotesque allocation of risk.
You don't generally have to disclose before sex that you've been accused of rape, committed multiple sexual offences, been a sex worker, had 500 partners without protection or have a sexual history your partner might find horrifying.
Which is completely the wrong way around. If you don't want to have sex with a trans person (or an Aston Villa fan, or a non-vegan, or anyone who might belong to some group you don't like without it being obvious) then the onus is fully on YOU, as the one with the problem, to ask THEM.
I refuse to accept the CPS framing. We're women with a medical history which is nobody else's business and that's the beginning and end of it.
I’ve now read the CPS consultation response on “deception as to sex”. And I am fucking furious. The CPS actually asked whether its approach properly balanced the rights of trans people to live fully in their acquired gender against the rights of complainants.
I am investigating what happened behind the scenes after Graham Linehan’s controversial Heathrow arrest and, specifically, what role, if any, Sir Mark Rowley or his senior office played in what followed.