Briana Vecchione

@briana-v.bsky.social

Researcher @datasociety.bsky.social • AI use/evaluation/accountability in mental health + companionship • Cornell IS PhD • brianavecchione.org • 🏳️‍🌈

New from 404 Media: humans are reading ChatGPT conversations. OpenAI has hired an army of contractors who read real ChatGPT users' chats. I've seen internal docs, the review system, and real user prompts. Sometimes they contain very personal and sensitive information www.404media.co/inside-proje...

Inside ‘Project Lily’: The Humans Reading Your ChatGPT Chats

Humans are reading ChatGPT users’ prompts to improve OpenAI’s models, and those chats can include sensitive, personal information, according to leaked internal documents and real prompts seen by 404 M...

404media.co

🌟 NEW PREPRINT 🌟 After six months of following people using chatbots for socioemotional health & 1 year of participatory engagements, we're proud to release a longitudinal qualitative study on how people use general-purpose LLMs and what it demands of AI governance: arxiv.org/abs/2605.23787

Engagement-Optimized Care: When LLMs become Mental Health Infrastructure

General-purpose LLMs are increasingly functioning as mental health infrastructure due to gaps in care left by provider shortages, inadequate insurance coverage, social isolation, and stigma around for...

arxiv.org

Can #AI chatbots become sources of care and intimacy? This #OpenAccess study examines #MentalHealth and spiritual chatbots, revealing how users share deeply personal information while raising questions about privacy and regulation. bit.ly/3KI5C2p @tamigraph.bsky.social @alicetiara.bsky.social

A chatbot for the soul: mental health care, privacy, and intimacy in AI-based conversational agents - Communication and Change

Artificial intelligence-based conversational agents—chatbots—are increasingly integrated into telehealth platforms, employee wellness programs, and mobile applications to address structural gaps in mental health care. While these chatbots promise accessibility, they are often deployed without sufficient impact assessment or even basic user testing. This paper presents a case study using community red-teaming exercises to evaluate a chatbot designed for wellness and spirituality. Unlike traditional red-teaming, which is conducted by engineers to assess vulnerabilities, community red-teaming treats impacted users as experts, uncovering concerns related to privacy, ethics, and functionality. Our fieldwork, conducted with undergraduate beta testers (n = 28), revealed that participants were often more comfortable sharing private information with the chatbot than with a stranger. Prior experience with commercial AI systems, such as ChatGPT, contributed to this ease. However, participants also raised concerns about misinformation, inadequate guardrails for sensitive topics, data security, and dependency. Despite these risks, users remained open to the chatbot’s potential as a spiritual wellness guide. We further examine how algorithmic impact assessments (AIAs) both capture and overlook key aspects of the spiritual chatbot user experience. These chatbots offer hyper-personalized, AI-mediated divination and wellness interactions, blurring the boundaries between astrology, mental health support, and spiritual guidance. The chameleon-like nature of these technologies challenges conventional assessment frameworks, necessitating a nuanced approach that considers specific use cases, potential user bases, and indirect impacts on broader communities. We argue that AIAs for care and wellness chatbots must account for these complexities, ensuring ethical deployment and mitigating harm.

bit.ly

Researching the use of chatbots for mental health support, D&S's @briana-v.bsky.social heard from many people who expected less stigma from chatbots than from therapists, “which is really interesting, given what we know about machine-learning bias,” she tells @undark.org. undark.org/2025/11/04/c...

Researchers Weigh the Use of AI for Mental Health

Chatbots weren't designed for mental health, but they are increasingly used for therapy. What are the risks an benefits?

undark.org

“The perennial availability of AI is rapidly reshaping our expectations of care,” @briana-v.bsky.social and Ranjit Singh write in a new blog post about this piece. “Care is not mere output. It lives in the slow, difficult work of attunement, which no machine can truly provide.”

Guest Blog: AI is Mental – Evaluating the Role of Chatbots in Mental Health Support

by Briana Vecchione and Ranjit Singh Vecchione, B., & Singh, R. (2025). Artificial intelligence is mental: Evaluating the role of large-lang...

bigdatasoc.blogspot.com

Data & Society@datasociety.bsky.social · last yr.

In @bigdatasoc.bsky.social, D&S researcher @briana-v.bsky.social & program director Ranjit Singh consider how the growing adoption of AI in mental health support impacts both users & providers, and advocate for a critical approach to its development & governance. journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/...

In tandem, Ranjit and I published a short guest piece that was released today on the BD&S blog! bigdatasoc.blogspot.com/2025/10/gues...

Guest Blog: AI is Mental – Evaluating the Role of Chatbots in Mental Health Support

by Briana Vecchione and Ranjit Singh Vecchione, B., & Singh, R. (2025). Artificial intelligence is mental: Evaluating the role of large-lang...

bigdatasoc.blogspot.com

Data & Society@datasociety.bsky.social · last yr.

In @bigdatasoc.bsky.social, D&S researcher @briana-v.bsky.social & program director Ranjit Singh consider how the growing adoption of AI in mental health support impacts both users & providers, and advocate for a critical approach to its development & governance. journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/...

Research (including that from tech companies) suggests that users are putting too much trust in AI chatbots. D&S researcher @briana-v.bsky.social notes that some people take chatbot output at face value, without critically considering the text the algorithms produce. undark.org/2025/09/12/c...

Are We Offloading Critical Thinking to Chatbots?

Research, much if it by companies with deep investment in AI, suggests that chatbot interactions alter how users think.

undark.org

🎉 Participants Needed for Paid Research! Do you use chatbots (e.g. ChatGPT) for mental health? @datasociety.bsky.social is studying how people use them for support. Details: ✔️ 4-week diary study ✔️ Optional 1-hr focus group ✔️ 45-min interview 💰 Earn up tp to $400 Learn more/sign up: bit.ly/4iCLkTd

Screening Form: Chatbots for Therapy

We are conducting a research study on how people use AI chatbots for mental health support and are looking for participants! If you regularly use an AI chatbot for emotional or mental health support, ...

bit.ly

Just a heads-up that our X account — where we haven't posted since November of last year — appears to have been hacked, this after two of our posts were falsely flagged as a "policy violation." Good times over there! Please note that here and LinkedIn are the only platforms we're active on.

🚨BREAKING. From a program officer at the National Science Foundation, a list of keywords that can cause a grant to be pulled. I will be sharing screenshots of these keywords along with a decision tree. Please share widely. This is a crisis for academic freedom & science.

list of banned keywords