Brad Shapiro

@btshapir.bsky.social

Marketing Professor @ChicagoBooth Co-editor @QME Optimist/Anti-Doomer

The new GLP-1 weight-loss drugs are an existential threat to diet peddlers, so it's not surprising to find them amplifying any risk from the meds. There's mostly silence from them on the ancillary benefits, notably kidney & cardiovascular disease.

I've been pretty consistent in my editorial view about this. I want a review process that is one round of referee input, then accepted after revision. If there remain some philosophical/conceptual differences of opinion, I'd rather the reviewers write a comment than iterate behind closed doors.

Ben Golub@bengolub.bsky.social · 2y ago

In economics, editors, referees, and authors often behave as if a published paper should reflect some kind of authoritative consensus. As a result, valuable debate happens in secret, and the resulting paper is an opaque compromise with anonymous co-authors called referees. 1/

One more thing: the current equilibrium favors less innovative, incremental papers getting published in the most selective outlets even more than peer review already does. Those are the ones for which the consensus process works best and tends to converge. A real loss for innovation. 6/6

It also makes for a bad equilibrium where publicly disagreeing with a paper (except very mildly and boringly) is infrequent and therefore an extreme signal. So people don't do it even when they feel published papers are wrong or misleading. 3/

When news reports about scientific papers make causal claims that are not justified by the original study, the mistake often traces to a university press release. Here, observational data reveals an association. The press release asserts causality. today.ucsd.edu/story/walkab...

Walkable Neighborhoods Help Adults Socialize, Increase Community

Adults who live in walkable neighborhoods are more likely to socialize and have a stronger sense of community, report researchers at the UC San Diego Herbert Wertheim School of Public Health and Human...

today.ucsd.edu

People sometimes make fun of science that sounds stupid and random. Meanwhile, a study of lizard saliva turned into a peptide medication, which was turned into a diabetes medication, which was turned into a GLP1 weight loss drug, that just became the first therapy every approved for … sleep apnea

The New York Times@nytimes.com · 2y ago

Breaking News: The FDA approved use of the weight loss drug Zepbound for a common form of sleep apnea. It is the first drug authorized to treat the disorder.

This place is exactly what I thought it was. The latest outrage is almost comical. A caricature. Some useful stuff on here, some very nice people too, but the "kind version of twitter" bsky most certainly is not. Go Bills!

H

If you receive a ref request and can't finish in the allotted time, you have options: - Decline the review. - Ask editor for more time. Then turn in report close to your new proposed deadline. Don't do: - Ghost the request - Agree to request then go months past the due date w/no communication

All sorts of face palm here. - using units to deliberately make effect size seem bigger - miscalculate the effect size by a factor of 10 - call that mistake a "typo" - say that a 10x smaller effect size doesn't change the policy recommendation(!!!!!) statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu/2024/12/13/h...

“How a simple math error sparked a panic about black plastic kitchen utensils”: Does it matter when an estimate is off by a factor of 10? | Statistical Modeling, Causal Inference, and Social Science...

statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu

Counterpoint: West Virginia had Joe Manchin as a Senator for how many years? Kentucky has a D governor. Kansas has a D governor. To me it seems like more an issue of finding state pols who are willing to deviate from the national party narrative in order to serve their constituents.

Jonathan Ladd@jonathanmladd.com · 2y ago

Not easy to solve. Party coalitions are like continental plates--constantly moving but rarely quickly. If the state Dem Parties in TX, OH, FL, etc knew of a set of political positions or the profile of a candidate that could win their base and swing voters they would have already done it.

Such a pet peeve of mine. "Follow the science" is meaningless advice. The science doesn't tell you what to do. It just gives you information (of varying degrees of quality/noisiness/bias). Decisions come from combining that info with *values*. The science doesn't give you your values.