Ben Golub

@bengolub.bsky.social

economics and computer science professor at Northwestern bengolub.net social and economic networks originally from Ukraine

Some initial thoughts, and a complicated mix of feelings. Wow. I mean, Erdos problems are cool (I genuinely mean that), I didn't know about the Jacobian conjecture before it got disproved. But this newest batch from OpenAI hits home in a way the previous announcements did not.

The place I donate blood gives points that you can exchange for gas cards which means I actually know the current exchange rate of blood for oil. Blood is going for 20.618 times an equivalent amount of oil.

To me (someone w/ no dog in this fight) your reply shows you are not a good scholar: rather than publicly confronting the clear evidence of your misrepresenting your sources, you turn to (perhaps correct) personal criticism of Magness. This is the behavior of (bad) politician, not a scholar.

Some very interesting discussion, reposted from X, about standards of accuracy in some research areas -- those who follow/read Slobodian might be interested. My take is that the intellectual hygiene in some areas is terrible, and there is very limited interest in any self-correction.

Ben Golub@bengolub.bsky.social · 2mo ago

It seems this news hasn't reached this platform yet, but Phil Magness has some striking notes on how @quinnslobodian.com quotes sources, which I'll simply reproduce here 1/

I joined the #nokings protest in Chicago. With the war between the USA, Iran, and Israel and grave human rights violations by the regimes of all three, the good people of these countries must not allow the acts of their leaders to be normalized. March 28, 2026.

At #nokings protest in front of Trump Tower in Chicago.  Holding sign: "good guys" don't bomb girls' schools.At #nokings protest in Chicago, holding sign: Bad regimes. Good people. USA, Iran, Israel.

This is a common question - Refine seems about equally useful for theory and empirical work. It thinks about, e.g., whether - the numbers in a paper make sense taken together - the econometric equations match up with the verbal claims - whether signs of effects make sense.

James Feigenbaum@jamesfeigenbaum.bsky.social · 9mo ago

The sales pitch seems much more targeted at theory than empirical papers. Did it "just" proof your paper or tell you what robustness checks to run or which standard errors to use?

If you sign up for Refine to proofread your papers, please use my referral link to create an account: www.refine.ink?ref=ay5ib2dh... That way we both can receive one free technical review!

refine

AI feedback for research.

refine.ink

Joshua Goodman@joshua-goodman.com · 9mo ago

I just used refine.ink to proofread a paper that's nearly ready for circulation. It had 23 comments. The first caught us using "reduces" instead of "increases" when describing our main treatment effect in the abstract. I highly endorse this tool for preventing such embarassing errors!

Check out refine.ink for AI technical referee reports on your papers if you haven't tried it yet DM me or reply if you want preview credits to see how it performs on papers of various kinds

Jessica Leight@leightjessica.bsky.social · 10mo ago

#econtwitter #econsky: recently used Refine.ink (developed by @ben_golub) as a AI assessment tool for papers + it is amazing, so wanted to share some examples of what it can do if you are curious. (It's much, much better than other free tools I've used)