Roberta Buffett Institute for Global Affairs

@buffett.northwestern.edu

The Roberta Buffett Institute for Global Affairs draws on cutting-edge international research across Northwestern University's 12 schools to generate new knowledge about pressing global challenges and promising solutions for addressing them.

Very happy to see this chapter out, troubled to think that peace for Ukraine still seems elusive and western support for the country slowly crumbling. EU countries are investing shockingly little into thought into the mid to long-term futures of displaced Ukrainians.

Political Science Department at Northwestern University@polisciatnu.bsky.social · 3w ago

Matej Jungwirth @matejjung.bsky.social & Neonila Glukhodid have co-authored "Returning to the Past? Typology of Decision-Making of Ukrainian Forced Migrants in the Czech Republic and Germany" out now in a new edited volume Fragmented Lives in Times of War via @columbiaup.bsky.social #OpenAccess

First page of Jungwirth, Matej/Glukhodid, Neonila (2026). Returning to the Past?. In: (Eds.), Fragmented Lives in Times of War (191-216). Bielefeld: transcript Verlag. https://doi.org/10.14361/9783839477427-191

Meaning-making and motivations for refugee return are understudied in general and they are particularly puzzling in the case of Ukrainians displaced after the fullscale Russian invasion in February 2022. First, returns to Ukraine are occurring in the middle of an ongoing conflict characterised, inter alia, by widespread airstrikes on civilian infrastructure;this contradicts the most basic international understandings of refugee repatriation as a process principally undertaken when conditions at home are both safe and sustainable. Second, EU member states hosting Ukrainian forced migrants after 2022 have been exceptionally receptive, both relative to other crises of forced displacement and overall ‒ invoking for the first time the European Union’s temporary protection directive that grants Ukrainian refugees unprecedented access to education, housing, health, and work in EU member states.

New research on hostage diplomacy negotiations co-authored by Buffett Faculty Fellow Danielle Gilbert ( @danigilbert.bsky.social ) ⬇️

Political Science Department at Northwestern University@polisciatnu.bsky.social · last mo.

🔥Hot off the press via @ispp-pops.bsky.social A very particular set of skills: The role of perspective-taking in hostage diplomacy negotiations Profs. Dani Gilbert ( @danigilbert.bsky.social / @buffett.northwestern.edu ) & Cynthia Wang ( @cynthiascwang.bsky.social / @drrc-kellogg.bsky.social )

Gilbert, D., & Wang, C. S. (2026). A very particular set of skills: The role of perspective-taking in hostage diplomacy negotiations. Political Psychology, 47, e70173. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.70173

Abstract
Hostage diplomacy—detaining foreign nationals for leverage under the pretext of national law—is a growing international security problem. Beyond constituting a violation of international law, hostage diplomacy is challenging to resolve. Target states must deal with aggressive, sovereign perpetrators; handle a fraudulent but plausible legal process; account for numerous stakeholders; and protect their citizens from future harm. How do target-state negotiators navigate these challenges? This theory-building article explores perspective-taking—imagining the world from another's vantage point—as a tool to shape target-state negotiators' effectiveness in navigating hostage diplomacy. We introduce a model that conceptualizes perspective-taking on two dimensions. First, negotiators can use multiple-perspective taking, considering various stakeholders, including interests within their own government, the perpetrator's government, and the hostage's family. Second, across stakeholders, negotiators can take strategic, cultural, emotional, and moral perspectives. We posit that engaging in different forms of perspective-taking improves target-state negotiators' ability to identify a domestic win-set, reach international agreement, and anticipate future crises. Drawing on insights from members of the U.S. hostage-recovery enterprise, we offer a plausibility probe suggesting that perspective-taking affects the process and outcomes of negotiations. Perspective-taking may thus help negotiators better manage power dynamics, navigate informal rules of engagement, alleviate uncertainty, and bolster global security.