Corey Dethier

@cdethier.bsky.social

Philosophy of science, epistemology, and random flights of fancy. Asst. prof at Clemson. He/him/whatever. coreydethier.com

One of the most ridiculous aspects of the academic copyright game is that publishers treat *tables* as distinct from normal text. Images, I get. Graphs? Ok, I can sortof see that. But tables? I have to specifically ask permission to use information that's in a table? Ridiculous.

NEW: In late 2024, FBI investigators had enough evidence to launch a sweeping bribery probe that could ensnare top lawmakers, including Sen. Susan Collins. Then Trump was reelected and eviscerated the FBI and DOJ teams handling public corruption probes.

The FBI Anti-Corruption Squad Was Circling Susan Collins — Until Trump Got in the Way

After the FBI caught a defense contractor’s CEO making illegal campaign contributions, it sought to launch a sweeping political bribery probe involving Collins and others. Then the second Trump admini...

propublica.org

Proof of a literacy crisis: pundit Derek Thompson can't read the studies he quotes. This is about "self-published genre fiction ... primarily sold on Amazon" and not “the book industry.” Imagine looking at TikTok slop and declaring “the film industry” is being replaced by AI actors and directors.

Derek Thompson
@DKThomp
Of the many, many books that predicted some dystopian effects of AI, few or none of them, to my knowledge, predicted that one of AI's first major effects would be to disrupt the book industry itself.

But that's exactly what seems to be happening.

- The number of AI-written books with any sales has grown by a factor of *19* since 2003
- Books with “substantial AI text” are making more money with every passing year
- Authors who don’t write with AI are earning less per book in almost every genre

El-Sayed: "My commitment to Jewish safety is the same commitment that I have to the safety of my own daughters. Because if there is one question of political philosophy that ought to animate us all, it's what would we do if we treated all our kids like they were all of our kids?"

I saw a very bad video on climate graphs a couple days ago, and since that's something I work on, thought that I should ... I don't know, make a blog post that maybe 20 people would see finals once were over?

The new directive asks USDA workers in the agency’s research arm to use Google to check the backgrounds of all foreign nationals collaborating with its scientists. The names of flagged scientists are being sent to national security experts at the agency, according to records reviewed by ProPublica.

Trump Administration Orders USDA Employees to Investigate Foreign Researchers They Work With

The new directive asks workers to check the backgrounds of foreign nationals collaborating with the department’s scientists for evidence of “subversive or criminal activity.” Their names are being sen...

propublica.org

Another of my papers, "Stability, Robustness Reasoning, and Measuring the Human Contribution to Warming" is now online. This one gets in the weeds of the last decade-ish of research on the human contribution to warming to motivate a simple philosophical claim ... (1/2) doi.org/10.1017/psa....

Stability, Robustness Reasoning, and Measuring the Human Contribution to Warming | Philosophy of Science | Cambridge Core

Stability, Robustness Reasoning, and Measuring the Human Contribution to Warming

doi.org

Wondering what I've been working on for the last couple years? (Probably not.) Wondering what philosophers of statistics even do? (I'm betting no.) Were you thinking to yourself: how would Deborah Mayo's project function outside a Neyman-Pearson setting? (Lol)

Brian McLoone, Steven Orzack, and Elliot Sober have a new paper out in which they argue (among other things) that I'm wrong about robustness. I think *they're* wrong, of course -- indeed, I think I addressed all their arguments already in the paper they cite. Unsurprisingly, they disagree!

Recently, I asked ChatGPT to write the intro to a paper in my style, because I curious how good it would be at imitating an author, and the best way to tell that would be by asking it to imitate the author I know best. (Don't worry, there's a punchline here. 1/3)

@lastpositivist.bsky.social · last yr.

I was reading about AI profiling so I did chat GPT on just a random picture (literally just screen-shotting my webcam) and, like, it basically gets me right in every detail - I'm even within the lower zones of its height and weight band estimates (I'm overweight lmao) so it called the low-info shot.

A person with a full beard and thick, curly hair is sitting indoors, facing the camera with a neutral expression. They are wearing a grey hoodie. Behind them is a bookshelf filled with a variety of books, a tan slip-on shoe, and a large green bottle. The setting appears to be a study or library.

seeing takes about the aid institutions and their role in imperialism. correct. If someone said "investor-owned hospitals exploit the vulnerable to benefit shareholders" I'd nod. If their followup was "and that's why I'm turning off your mom's dialysis machine" I'd...have some followup questions

Nanjala@nanjala.bsky.social · 2y ago

But when it comes to cutting aid budgets no one says “let’s spend less money on Israeli or Egyptian military capacity”. Instead you want to start by taking healthcare and education away from people who have been made vulnerable by the structural injustices you create and benefit from.