Chiara De Franco

@chiara-defranco.bsky.social

Associate Prof of IR @ Uni of Southern Denmark | human protection | EU, UN, AU | diplomacy| languaging | mother of two | she/her

Presented my paper on the EU and human rights at a brilliant LSE/KCL workshop on Europe in the Trump era. Big thanks to the organisers Federica Bicchi, Benedetta Voltolini, Karen Smith and Benedetta Morari. Also my first time back in London in 12 years—I’d missed this city (even the tube).

Bild

Baltic crisis, cyber chaos, pipelines blown, NATO sweating—just another Monday in the classroom with our BA students in political science and Cand.Negot. They nailed it. They tuned in, negotiated, made decisions despite uncertainty. Props to Hendrik Huelss for co-running the madness.

BildBildBildBild

The same people who are responsible for the signal gate think that they can negotiate a lasting end to the war in Ukraine. Putin’s russia is eating them alive. They project weakness and amateurism on scales unseen before

Bild

Dump&Vile continue to cancel history and make idiotic statements. Denmark has been a steadfast ally—Danes have lost lives, limbs, and sleep in Afghanistan. More than any other ally (pro capita). If they wanted more US military presence in Greenland, they could’ve just asked… three months ago.

Anton Gerashchenko@antongerashchenko.bsky.social · last yr.

US Vice President JD Vance: "Denmark, which controls Greenland, is not doing its job and it's not being a good ally. How are we going to solve that problem? If that means we need to take more territorial interest in Greenland, that is what President Trump is going to do because ⤵️

I have studied warnings for nearly 17 years now and when it comes to the deadly risks the US democracy is facing, I keep seeing very strong warning indications (as in the case of the article below) but almost no proper warning, which is typical of developing crises www.nytimes.com/2025/03/20/w...

‘This Is Worse’: Trump’s Judicial Defiance Veers Beyond the Autocrat Playbook

The president’s escalating conflict with federal courts is even more aggressive than what happened in countries like Hungary and Turkey, experts say.

nytimes.com

1/🧵 Judges across ideological lines are ruling against Trump at strikingly similar rates (84% liberal, 86% centrist, 82% conservative). This isn't partisan opposition to Trump—it's the judiciary functioning as intended by cutting across partisan lines to uphold the Constitution.

Title: Both Liberal and Conservative Judges Rule Against Trump
Description: A scatter plot showing the rulings of judges against or in favor of Trump, categorized by ideology using the DIME score. The x-axis represents Judge Ideology (DIME Score), ranging from liberal (-1) to conservative (1), and the y-axis represents the case outcome (against or for Trump).
	•	Blue dots represent liberal judges, purple dots represent moderate judges, and red dots represent conservative judges.
	•	Some judges are labeled, including Rudolph Contreras, Lauren King, John Coughenour, and James Emanuel Boasberg on the liberal to moderate side, and Carl Nichols, Richard J. Leon, and Joseph N. Laplante on the conservative side.
	•	A note mentions that Boasberg, though slightly right-leaning, was initially appointed by George W. Bush.
	•	The visualization suggests that judges from both ideological backgrounds ruled against Trump.

@djpressman.bsky.social, Soha Hammam, and I draw on our research through the Crowd Counting Consortium to show that there is far more protest happening in the US than is commonly understood, and that the shift to economic noncooperation shows powerful potential for future collective action.

Resistance is alive and well in the United States

Protests of Trump may not look like the mass marches in 2017, but they're far more numerous and frequent — and also becoming more strategic.

urldefense.proofpoint.com

This is what you get when you mess with us—no enjoyment here. I’m no fan of European militarization, but it needs to be said: The claim that Europeans exploited the US military umbrella under NATO—the GDP percentage argument—ignores that much of EU defense spending went to buying US weapons.

Mark Chadbourn@chadbourn.bsky.social · last yr.

Denmark’s Defence Committee chair Rasmus Jarlov: “Buying American weapons is a security risk that we can not run. We will make enormous investments in air defence, fighter jets, artillery and other weapons in the coming years, and we must avoid American...” BTW, he’s a Conservative.

"To protect civilians and other victims of war – in Europe and beyond – it is critical to ... reject the notion that respect for IHL can be subordinated to security or defence considerations, however exceptional the circumstances." blogs.icrc.org/law-and-poli...

Anti-personnel mines: the false promise of security through exceptionalism in war

Efforts to abandon the APMBC challenge fundamental precepts of IHL and undermine essential safeguards for upholding humanity in war.

blogs.icrc.org

This is shameful and reckless—on so many levels that it’s hard to know where to begin. This is not the way forward, Europe. We must strengthen, not dismantle, the few widely accepted rules protecting civilians in conflict. We need alliances built on shared norms, not fuel warmongering instincts.

Anton Gerashchenko@antongerashchenko.bsky.social · last yr.

❗️Lithuania, Poland, Latvia and Estonia have announced their withdrawal from the Ottawa Convention on Anti-Personnel Mines.

Mark Rutte doesn’t want to drag NATO into this? Seriously? If NATO SG can’t even hold the line on Greenland, what is he even there for? I like to believe international organizations outlast erratic leaders—but clearly NATO might prove me wrong www.reuters.com/world/trump-...

Trump expresses confidence that US will annex Greenland

President Donald Trump expressed confidence on Thursday that the United States would annex Greenland.

reuters.com