Dr. Chinasa T. Okolo

@chinasa.bsky.social

AI Researcher, Policy Strategist, & Technorealist. Founder, Technecultura. Columnist, Science Magazine. Cornell Computer Science PhD. TIME100 AI. Forbes Under 30 AI. Critically examining global equity in AI. 👩🏾‍💻: www.chinasatokolo.com 📩: bit.ly/contactCTO

"AI does not have intent or desire, AI would not be able to access physical institutions in order to set off a bioweapon, and no research to date has demonstrated the extreme extinction-level capabilities to warrant these warnings." www.rollingstone.com/culture/cult...

I've Worked in AI for a Decade. Here's Why I'm Not Scared of It

Rumman Chowdhury, former United States Science Envoy for AI in the Biden Administration, on why she doesn't buy the AI doomer rhetoric.

rollingstone.com

“There is no established path showing that today’s AI systems will surpass the smartest humans, much less a scientific basis for calculating the likelihood that such systems will destroy humanity.” thebulletin.org/2026/09/how-...

How the bad science of AI doomerism is good for big business

There is no clear path showing that today’s AI systems will lead to superintelligence, much less a basis for calculating the probability of doom.

thebulletin.org

To think that there is nothing to be learned and innovated on from the safety practices of other industries is lunacy. AI tools are power. They are not magical or exempt from safety practices that work for other complex systems. Governing AI requires disenchantment; break the spell.

Finished my first week in the U.S. Senate, and in one of the many policy proposals I was asked to review, I had to point out how the billions of dollars being spent on AI safety research by effective altruism organizations poses a serious conflict of interest.

Timnit Gebru@timnitgebru.blacksky.app · 3w ago

Even more depressing than the knowledge that congress is now overrun by effective altruist and overall TESCREAL cult member staffers, is the number of billionaires in these cults that are going to be created by the OpenAI and Anthropic IPOs.

The Nigerian president released an AI-generated video to address the country on Independence Day this past Thursday 🤦🏾‍♀️ Many people don’t know that when the President of Gabon released an AI-generated video after not being seen for a few months in 2019, a coup happened shortly after.

Started my fellowship in the Senate earlier this week, and my dad doesn’t understand why I don’t have my own office (this is my first job in D.C. where I haven’t had my own space). He also asked why they didn’t put “Dr.” on my ID 🤣

"The idea that the ruling Communist Party could lose control over a technology is almost unfathomable. The authorities have successfully policed other potentially destabilizing technologies before, most notably the internet." www.nytimes.com/2026/09/27/w...

The Surprising Reasons China Is Skeptical of A.I. Safety Calls

In China, A.I. doomsday warnings can feel distinctly Western or like a ploy to stop Chinese A.I. companies from trying to overtake their U.S. rivals.

nytimes.com

Really glad someone is writing about this! I instantly knew the “National Academy of Artificial Intelligence” was a scam. I’ve also been repeatedly contacted by the “American Society for AI” over the past year, and had to block many people associated with that organization on LinkedIn.

Max Kozlov@maxkozlov.bsky.social · last mo.

SCOOP: Top researchers at Columbia, Stanford, and others thought they were elected to elite scientific societies alongside Nobel laureates. The catch? The organizations are a sham. I spent the last month diving deep into a massive academic scam spanning continents, for @nature.com

I got an invitation to a policy roundtable that had interesting words like “practical worldbuilding”, “abundance”, and an organization that works on “welfare of future sentient beings”… Looked up funding info for the hosting organizations, and of course they’re funded by major effective altruists 😬

"There are robust, decades-old legal frameworks that give companies that make AI systems a powerful set of incentives to be responsible stewards...Characterizing AI as an existential threat to humanity opens the door to undermining those frameworks." www.brookings.edu/articles/is-...

Is the AI existential threat real—and can regulatory action prevent it? | Brookings

Scholars from across Brookings address the risks of AI and what regulatory actions are necessary to prevent them.

brookings.edu