Chinmayi Arun

@chinmayiarun.bsky.social

Law & Technology researcher. Executive Director @yaleisp.bsky.social. Lecturer & Research Scholar, Yale Law School. Posts are personal.

2nd symposium essay: Communicative Platforms and Epistemic Closure, forthcoming 112 Cornell L. Rev. ___ (2026). I frame social media and AI chatbot harm as epistemic closure, and introduce two ideas: platforms’ connective power and ideological recruitment. papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....

Communicative Platforms and Epistemic Closure [forthcoming<span>112 Cornell L. Rev.__</span><span> (2026)]</span> <p><span></span></p>

Social media and AI chatbots' large-scale harms result from a concentrated industry in which companies compete to capture attention, displacing the press, unive

papers.ssrn.com

A common comment on my videos about LLM "hallucinations" is that this isn't as much of a problem because LLMs "cite their sources" now. This is a category error. Citing a source implies it was consulted. LLMs do not consult, even with RAG. A citation might be *included* but it's not *consulted*.

I argue in this piece that Big Tech is creating its own digital empire through what I call the Silicon Valley Effect law.stanford.edu/publications... Major AI companies are shaping the transnational legal order by lobbying, direct influence and influencing regulatory discourse.

The Silicon Valley Effect | Stanford Law School

The most influential Artificial Intelligence (“AI”) companies are shaping AI’s legal order and regulatory discourse to protect their business in

law.stanford.edu

New essay about why the right to receive ideas should evolve into the right to access communicative infrastructure (changing what counts as burdening speech in TikTok v. Garland). I am grateful to @katygb.bsky.social @jameeljaffer.bsky.social and @knightcolumbia.org for the opportunity and feedback.

Knight First Amendment Institute@knightcolumbia.org · 5mo ago

In a new essay, @chinmayiarun.bsky.social (@yaleisp.bsky.social) argues that foreign social media platforms are unique associational and speech infrastructures that should be treated differently from other foreign infrastructure, challenging the Supreme Court's view in #TikTok Inc. v. Garland.

"logic of Musk’s empire is total. X shapes the discourse. Grok automates it. Grokipedia rewrites the historical record. Starlink can deliver it all, everywhere, to everyone. Each layer reinforces the others. It’s not about winning arguments in the public sphere. It’s about building a replacement."

Astra Taylor@astra.bsky.social · 6mo ago

Muskism by @bentarnoff.com and @quinnslobodian.com is now out. My endorsement: “A wholly original and insightful analysis that deserves to be read by the billions of people impacted by Musk’s pathological quest for power and wealth.”

The European Commission issued X a fine of €120 million for breaching its obligations under the Digital Services Act (DSA), reports Ramsha Jahangir. Infractions include deceptive design of X's ‘blue checkmark,' lack of transparency of its ad repository, and failure to provide access to researchers.

Brussels Fines Musk’s X €120M, Firing Shot in Transatlantic Tech Showdown | TechPolicy.Press

Infractions include deceptive design of X's ‘blue checkmark,' lack of transparency of its ad repository, and failure to provide access to researchers.

techpolicy.press

As many know, @bjard.bsky.social and I have been drafting a Technology Law coursebook for a few years. We've used it to teach classes at three institutions, including Yale Law School, and others have used chapters in their techlaw classes. We're excited to share the current version more broadly!

In 2019 Meta did causal research looking at the effects of randomly asking Facebook users to stop using the platform for a month. After the first week of the study, results showed that leaving the platform was good for people’s mental health. Meta then shut the project down.

Bild