Chris Kahler

@chriskahlerphd.bsky.social

Psychologist, Professor of Behavioral and Social Sciences. Director, Center for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, Brown University School of Public Health. Vice Prez, Research Society on Alcohol. Intervention researcher: alcohol, smoking, HIV

This is an outstanding piece. One of their recommendations really stood out to me: Grow a community of truth tellers. We have to keep documenting and communicating what is happening and how it harms science, health, democracy, and the public.

Jenna Norton@jenna-m-norton.bsky.social · 2mo ago

Great op-ed from my former colleagues and fellow Bethesda Declaration signers, Sylvia Chou and Alexa Romberg, on how censorship is becoming insidious at NIH and across the scientific community. www.insidehighered.com/opinion/view...

The results of the Alcohol Intake and Health Study, originally intended to be part of a government report to inform U.S. dietary guidelines, are now available at JSAD. This rigorous evaluation is a crucial contribution to evidence-based public health. www.jsad.com/doi/abs/10.1...

Alcohol Intake and Health Study: No Protective Effect at Low Levels, With Mortality Increasing to 1 in 25 at 14 Drinks Per Week: Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs: Vol 87, No 4

Objective: The purpose of this study was to estimate the lifetime risk of alcohol-attributable mortality and morbidity in the United States based on a person’s average lifetime weekly alcohol consumption to assess the impact of per-occasion alcohol consumption on health. Method: Lifetime risks were estimated using a cause-specific modeling approach that combined exposure data from national health surveys, relative risks, population data from the U.S. Census Bureau, mortality data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and morbidity data from the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation. A narrative review assessed the health impact of per-occasion alcohol consumption on health. Results: At low levels of consumption, no protective net effect of alcohol consumption on health was observed. Elevated mortality and morbidity risks were associated with alcohol consumption starting at relatively low levels. Males consuming >6.5 (95% CI [<1, 13.5]) and females consuming >7.0 (95% CI [<1, 11.5]) drinks per week had life-time alcohol-attributable mortality risks >1:1,000. At >8.5 (95% CI [2.5, 13]) drinks per week for both males and females, these risks increased to >1:100. At 14 drinks per week for males (the upper limit of the former Dietary Guidelines for males), the risk of an alcohol-caused death was 1:25 (4%). Drinking patterns also impacted risk. Above 1 drink per occasion, higher consumption was associated with progressively increased risks of breast cancer, cardiovascular disease, and injury. Conclusions: Alcohol consumption, including at what may be perceived as “moderate” levels, is associated with increased mortality and morbidity risks. These results support tightening alcohol use guidance in the United States, for both males and females, to no more than 1 drink per day. Public health significance statement: The Alcohol Intake and Health Study shows that for Americans, even what is socially considered “moderate drinking” increases the risk of dying or developing health problems, helping people better understand the net health impact of alcohol. Furthermore, by identifying the levels of alcohol use that raise the risk of cancer, cardiovascular disease, and injury, these findings can guide individuals, families, and communities in making safer choices about drinking patterns. The results also support changing the U.S. Dietary Guidelines on alcohol to recommend that current adult drinkers consume 1 drink or less in a day.

jsad.com

Ultimately, this is an all hands moment. Every action, no matter how small, helps push the defense of science and free expression forward. This is one of the most direct ways people can influence executive action, and it doesn’t have to be difficult.

The SUFS Guide to Writing Public Comments — Your Site Title

Written by: Cole Donovan, Director of Policy and Advocacy and Colette Delawalla, PhD, CEO <p class="docData;DOCY;v5;31090;BQiAAgAAEcIDAAAGxgMAAAMMbgAABR52AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA...

standupforscience.foundation

This is such a valuable resource and can help a range of affected individuals and organizations craft responses to these uniquely destructive proposed rule changes. Everyone can and should provide informed comments. It's too important.

Nigel Goldenfeld@nigelgoldenfeld.bsky.social · 2mo ago

@elizabethginexi.bsky.social explains how the OMB proposed rule changes will affect States, cities, not just destroy science. "... in FY2024 the federal government sent $1.1 trillion in grants to state and local governments. ". ie. Medicaid, Transportation, Education. Also how to fight back.

Time to think about Annual Meeting workshops...like the Legislative Advocacy Workshop hosted on Monday June 22nd! Learn how to engage in advocacy across every stage of your career. Please Note: Anyone may attend, but a ticket is required to reserve a box lunch (limited supply).

Bild

NEW: A serious staffing shortage — of the Trump admin's own making — is delaying the agency's ability to send billions to universities around the country, leaving labs reeling in the meantime. “I thought we were at rock bottom”, a senior NIH official said. “We are below rock bottom now.”

NIH staffing shortage could slash number of new grants issued this year

Some units at the US funding giant are so understaffed, they are focusing on mandated grant renewals rather than new awards.

nature.com

Here is a measure of multi-year funding. The amounts of funds estimated to be committed for years beyond the first year for multi-year funded awards are shown. The curve for 2026 is at or above those for earlier fiscal years and it expected to increase to the level from fiscal year 2025. 4/4

A line graph for the amount of funds devoted beyond year 1 for multi-year funded awards for fiscal year 2026 compared with earlier fiscal years. The curve for fiscal year 2026 now lies slightly above those for earlier fiscal years.