Tessera
Folgen

Dakota the Corgi

@chubs04.bsky.social

A bundle of fluff

659 Posts453 Follower1110 Folgt
Laurence H. Tribe@tribelaw.bsky.social · 7mo ago

www.instagram.com/reel/DUD_Dl2...

springsteen on Instagram: "I wrote this song on Saturday, recorded it yesterday and released it to you today in response to the state terror being visited on …"

I wrote this song on Saturday, recorded it yesterday and released it to you today in response to the state terror being visited on the city of Minneapolis. It’s dedicated to the people of Minneapolis, our innocent immigrant neighbors and in memory of Alex Pretti and Renee Good.Stay free, Bruce SpringsteenView all 3,146 comments

instagram.com

Seth Abramson@sethabramson.bsky.social · 8mo ago

UPDATE: CNN confirms that "the envelope [holding the Epstein-Nassar Note] was sent from the Metropolitan Correctional Center in New York City [where Epstein was being held] to Nassar"—*and* got vetted by federal officials. Which explains the Virginia postmark (where the FBI is).

Ryan Goodman@rgoodlaw.bsky.social · 8mo ago

On left: Bari Weiss: 60 Minutes segment failed to show Government view that CECOT detainees are due judicial review On right: Judge Boasberg Dec 22: "The Government itself has not even contested that the detainees who now make up the CECOT class received inadequate process prior to their removal"

BildBild
emptywheel@emptywheel.bsky.social · last yr.

Blanche sets up the request this way. On July 6, DOJ released a report. After July 6, people still wanted info. 😬 No mention of lies before it. No mention of DOJ's faceplant efforts to release prison video. No mention of the WSJ article. No mention of the President's fevered social media posts.

On July 6, 2025, the Department of Justice and Federal Bureau of Investigation issued a memorandum describing an exhaustive review undertaken of investigative holdings relating to Jeffrey Epstein (the “Memorandum”).1 The Memorandum detailed the steps taken by the Department of Justice and Federal Bureau of Investigation to determine whether evidence existed that could predicate an investigation into uncharged third parties. As the Memorandum concluded, no such evidence was uncovered during the review. Since July 6, 2025, there has been extensive public interest in the basis for the Memorandum’s conclusions. While the Department of Justice and Federal Bureau of Investigation continue to adhere to the conclusions reached in the Memorandum, transparency to the American public is of the utmost importance to this Administration. Given the public interest in the investigative work conducted by the Department of Justice and Federal Bureau of Investigation into Epstein, the Department of Justice moves the Court to unseal the underlying grand jury transcripts in United States v. Epstein, subject to appropriate redactions of victim-related and other personal identifying information.2 The Department will work with the United States Attorney’s Office for Southern District of New York to make appropriate redactions of victim-related information and other personal identifying information prior to releasing the transcripts. Transparency in this process will not be at the expense of our obligation under the law to protect victims.
Donovan Orville Gidcomb, The Celebrated D.O.G.@thecelebrateddog.bsky.social · last yr.

Good work. But we need more of this running on loops over every media platform. Millions of voters didn’t listen in 2024; we have to reach them now.

The Tennessee Holler @thetnholler.bsky.social · last yr.

🎪 🤦🏻‍♂️ SUPERCUT: Trump’s Cabinet (of very rich people) flails on the Sunday Shows as they try to defend Trump tanking the economy with tariffs — except for Russia Full: www.instagram.com/reel/DIHIVnX...

Dakota the Corgi@chubs04.bsky.social · last yr.

Something interesting. Mom and I just heard on CNBC. Republicans are now freaking out about the tariffs because they think they’ll be wiped out in midterms. One of the anchors on CNBC said Trump doesn’t care. He’s not up for the reelection and he could care less if these guys get re-elected again.

Senator Bernie Sanders@sanders.senate.gov · last yr.

Secretary Lutnick: You are a billionaire. Maybe your mother-in-law wouldn't complain if she didn't get her Social Security check, but tens of millions of seniors struggling to survive would. They're not fraudsters. They earned it. How out of touch are you not to realize that?

Social Security Works@socialsecurityworks.org · last yr.

BREAKING: Trump's billionaire Commerce Secretary says that seniors won't care if they don't get their Social Security checks — and that anyone who does complain is a fraudster.

Ben Collins@bencollins.bsky.social · last yr.

80-year-old, starving to death: money? for food please? lutnick: avast, grifter! defense contractor who met Peter Thiel once and makes AI bazookas that shoot stray dogs on sight: I need $10 billion... for reasons lutnick: say less sir, yes sir, right this way sir

MeidasTouch@meidastouch.com · last yr.

Trump’s commerce secretary Howard Lutnick says if Social Security skipped a check, his mother-in-law wouldn’t complain—and if you would, it indicates you are probably a fraudster. Insane.