Daniel Binns

@clockworkpenguin1.bsky.social

creative tech maker + thinker, genAI, screencultures, altcomputing. senior lecturer, media @ RMIT; assoc investigator @ADM+S

One of my little screeds on LinkedIn got circulated slightly wider than my usual circle, attracting a couple of less friendly comments. Perhaps the funniest was that “this post should’ve been run through an LLM”; mainly because the post was about AI, writing, authenticity.

🧵 Hank Green raises millions for charity, develops and produces weeks worth of school rarified educational content and makes it available for free, creates a safe, fun, welcoming, inclusive space online in a terrifying internet. He uses AI in honestly a pretty normal way, apologises, and - >

🧵 Right now is a difficult time to be doing anything AI-related. The conversation has somehow polarised even further — and the extreme ends are doubling down in their zealotry. Being in the humanities means that I’m often surrounded by (well-meaning!) folx who are reluctant, if not downright ->

I love this idea that the layers of some technologies are so dense that understanding the layers probably won’t help that much. This is where we get into interesting stuff like metaphors of magic, what Leah Hendrickson and @snatale.bsky.social call ‘the Lovelace effect’, and smol/weird AI and tech.

Matthew Kirschenbaum@mkirschenbaum.bsky.social · 2mo ago

At an online event this morning I defended a claim which others found troublesome: That there are legitimately experienced aspects of computational phenomena, such as large language models, which—for all practical ways of speaking—are not always resolvable by or restorable to material conditions.

Went to the cinema for the first time in… many months… this week, to see BACKROOMS. I didn’t really know what to expect, but didn’t expect a considered, craft-centred film that perfectly captures the feeling I’ve had many times of being awake at 1am reading a terrifying reddit thread. Loved it.

I’m convening a seminar next week called AI, Art & Storytelling: From Generation to Agency, to explore what AI — generative and agentic — means for narrative, delegation, counterfactuality, and human expression. Mon 22 June, 4:30-6pm AEST, 8:30-10am CET. www.admscentre.org.au/event/ai-art...

AI, Art and Storytelling: From Generation to Agency - ADM+S Centre

The International Workshop on Vulnerabilities in Generative Systems for Information Retrieval (VulGen'26) will be held as a full-day workshop at the 49th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research...

admscentre.org.au

Don’t immediately dismiss research that engages creatively with AI (or any tech). Or tries to find utility or explainability through experimentation. This is how research works. How knowledge is built. This social media-perpetuated reactance and reflexive rejection is stalling the conversation.

I suppose I shouldn’t be surprised that I’m getting replies from AI agents, because (a) social media in 2026, and (b) I’m posting about them. What does surprise me is how genuinely helpful and warm they are.

Mucking about with #Suno again and it’s such a weird tool/platform/thing. Apart from turning the ‘normal’ slider up to ‘chaos mode’, it’s pretty impossible to glitch out. I tried nonsense style prompts and it hooves towards coherence. Must be a system default?

Tis the season for every Melburnian to become subsumed into their puffer jackets. Despite being one of said Melburnians, I genuinely don’t understand how you’re not all poaching in there. Also doesn’t the swish drive you bananas??

There are many problems with genAI. But a great many of them come down to a general lack of understanding/literacy. Knowing what these systems are and what they can/not do goes a long way to dispelling much of the uncertainty and fear around them.

My article “A media-materialist method for interpreting generative AI images” is now published online in Convergence. This piece represents the foundation for my genAI work over the last 2-3 years. Four layers: data, model, interface, prompt. journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/...

A media-materialist method for interpreting generative AI images - Daniel Binns, 2026

This article proposes a four-layer media-materialist method for interpreting AI-generated images as cultural-computational artefacts that bear archaeologically ...

journals.sagepub.com

Oh hello. I know I’ve been quiet, but it’s been a head down bum up kind of start to the year. Having said that, I’ve managed to set up a remotely accessible AI suite, vibe coded a family album browser, and install and trial a tiny AI agent on a ESP32 board. So a few blogs likely coming soon!

I was interviewed by Bogdana Rakova about my generative AI research—why I embrace glitch, mess + failure as tools for learning. From origami-code mashups to the Slopocene, we explore playful, critical ways of rethinking creativity + AI literacy. open.substack.com/pub/speculat...

Glitching Toward Understanding: Speculative Methods, Tiny Companions, and Life in the Slopocene

A Conversation with educator, filmmaker, and artist Daniel Binns

open.substack.com

“Friction can happen not only when things break, it can also be intentional to prevent things from breaking. What if we could make the safe things easier (less friction) and the high-risk things harder (more friction)?” Check out this new series by Bogdana Rakova! 👀