Ekaterina (Katja) Pashevich

@cosmickate.bsky.social

Philosopher of technology, critical to everything AI, amateur climber, plant mother, reading horse (bookworm in Danish)

New paper alert! I´m glad to share with you the result of my collaboration with data scientist and philosopher Jens Ulrik Hansen (Roskilde University). Here, we aim to bring clarity to a somewhat overhyped concept of "synthetic data", using the relational view on data. #synthetic #data #philosophy

On the Conceptualization of Synthetic Data: Why Not All Synthetic Data are Useful and Some are - Minds and Machines

Synthetic data are increasingly used across the sciences and industry and are widely regarded as a solution to data problems such as privacy, bias mitigation, and data insufficiency. At the same time, the “promises” of synthetic data have faced substantial scholarly critique. We argue that much of the disagreement surrounding the usefulness of synthetic data stems from a lack of clarity about what synthetic data actually are and what they can do. In this paper, we examine several conceptualizations of synthetic data and propose a refined concept of synthesized data that more accurately captures the phenomenon commonly referred to as synthetic data. We argue that synthetic data cannot be conceptualized in contrast with other types of data. Moreover, there is no meaningful difference between synthetic data and data. We further prove this argument through an Iceberg model of the process of data synthetization and utilization, which addresses the “submerged” data risks such as bias, privacy, and validity, thus ensuring the usefulness of synthesized data. Our approach is grounded in a relational view of data, which links their intended purpose with their method of generation. We further elaborate this connection through concrete examples. In conclusion, we demonstrate the complexity of synthesized data in relation to their utility, which often remains hidden in current discourse on synthetic data.

doi.org

Being raised in Russia, I of course had a number of traumatic reading experiences as a child. I will give you a classic: Turgenev’s “Mumu” is about a deaf peasant who is forced to drown his dog in a lake. Read in school, of course. One doesn’t really recover from this.

Anne Thériault@annetheriault.bsky.social · 3mo ago

Was chatting about this during an interview with an author, but it was interesting enough that I’d like to open up the question to all of you: what’s the first literary/fictional death that made an impression on you as a kid? Mine has to be poor old Mary Lennox’s family in The Secret Garden.

Not to be dramatic but I feel like living past 2019 was a mistake. Covid, the Ukraine war, Gaza genocide, and now seeing everyone around me using ChatGPT (or whatever) for everything — I’ve learned enough about this world and about people. I have to leave the society or I won’t make it, I feel.

In the book, I explain what everyone needs to know about military operations and the conduct of war. It is not an academic book but rather an easily accessible introduction for everyone who is concerned about what's going on in the world and wants a deeper understanding of the military mechanics.

Anders Puck Nielsen@anderspucknielsen.dk · 4mo ago

The international version of my book, The Logic of War, is finally available in bookstores worldwide, such as Amazon. This means you can now get it globally without paying high shipping fees.

Cover of The Logic of War.

All my life, I have always read slowly. Tried an audiobook once but my mind kept wandering from it. Heard about immersive (book + audio) reading, but didn’t want to pay twice for one book. This week I think I have found a perfect focus combo: non-fiction audiobook while walking in the city.

Another group of people I might never understand no matter how I try: those believing the question of whether AI has consciousness is the most pressing problem in the world at the moment. It’s not even in my top 100 of currently pressing issues. Just why? Why do they care about that of all things?

Rapidly losing my social circle to AI (meaning, LLM-based chatbots). I just can’t understand the allure. Why are people so drawn to such mediocre tech? For me, in terms of need and convenience, it’s similar to home assistants and fitness wearables. Never had them, never missed on anything.

About Washington Post today. When the first war in Ukraine began in 2014, Putin shifted owners and editors in the leading news organizations. Then the journalists were either pressured to write propaganda or were laid off. Eight years later -- the full-scale invasion became possible.

At some point (when I got 30) I abandoned any attempts to “save” my parents from themselves. And then (I realize it now) I also gave up on saving anybody. I still sometimes get the urge to help, to educate, to save. But increasingly I realize this is futile. Maybe making own mistakes is the way.

I don't think people appreciate enough the fact that, at a time where global warming was approaching an inflection point yet renewable energy was finally becoming economically viable, we decided to squander that opportunity because literal death cultists decided we needed Infinite Bullshit Machines.