Mitch Green

@councilorgreen.bsky.social

Official account for Portland City Councilor Mitch Green from District 4. portland.gov/disclaimer https://linktr.ee/councilorgreen

We’re hearing testimony on the Moda term sheet today. I have filed an amendment that seeks to do two broad things: 1. empower the Joint Authority to limit expenditure public funds in the public interest with transparency and accountability 2. Reduce City’s commitment from $400M -> $120MM

portland.gov

Just want to acknowledge here that while I wasn’t aware of the burn ban, it was still a dumb thing to do and you gotta check these things. Especially me. I didn’t, I own that, and I am really grateful for the responders on Engine 18 who showed up to make sure the situation was under control.

City Councilor Mitch Green Violated Burn Ban by Starting Backyard Brush Fire

Just before 8 pm on July 26, a 911 dispatcher received a call concerning a fire in the backyard of a Southwest Portland home. It was the home of Councilor Mitch Green.

wweek.com

We upgraded our license to accommodate more RSVPs for this webinar! Don’t miss out for this discussion with two senior scholars in the field of sports economics.

Mitch Green@councilorgreen.bsky.social · 4d ago

Join me, sports economists @jcbradbury.com & @victor-matheson.bsky.social with co-host @councilormorillo.bsky.social on the economics of publicly funded stadiums. The term sheet is coming with limited information provided to us on the Moda Center renovations. Let’s discuss. zoom.us/webinar/regi...

Not my district, but c’mon man. I’ll be sending a letter to Parks about this (with a cc to the D3 councilors), but this is one of those moments where in the midst of the many ongoing policy challenges that Portlanders experience that have no near term solution, you don’t add some new pain like this

City Orders Citizen-Run Youth Program to Discontinue Popular Waterslide

The Brooklyn Park water slide in Southeast Portland—used by youthful summer day campers for nearly 50 years—was shut down after coming to the attention of Portland Parks and Recreation.

wweek.com

Some context regarding Moda Center renovations. The Trail Blazers $600 million request is larger than any recent/planned public contribution to an NBA/NHL arena renovation. It's not "market rate" or even reasonable. What Dundon is demanding is an outlier.

Dot plot showing the median public contribution to NBA renovations from 2025 and beyond is $338 million.

Setting aside whether the relocation threat is real or a bluff (and reserving judgement on how each elected evaluates *that* piece), if you claim that there’ll be an econ impact you need to say what it is. Once you’ve done that you need to be able to articulate the credibility of the impact.

Brandon Mullen@brandonmullen.com · 2w ago

Senator Lieber, talking about SB 1501: "We needed to keep what we have." Says the Blazers leaving will have an economic impact, but doesn't articulate what it would be. "It just will."

This Thursday the Committee of the whole will be hearing about the transfer of a franchise agreement between Zenith Energy and I Squared Capital. Sign up to testify in person, virtually, or submit written testimony if you can’t attend! www.portland.gov/council-cler...

Register for testimony or submit written testimony to Council

Complete this form to register to provide verbal testimony on an agenda item during Council and committee meetings, or to submit written testimony on an item.

portland.gov

Don’t miss this on July 28th. Join Commissioner Megan Moyer @multcomoyer.bsky.social and me for coffee and tea in Goose Hollow at Bold Coffee & Books. Please RSVP so we know who we’re expecting. It’s a cozy space and open to the public. www.eventbrite.com/e/city-count...

City, County, Coffee with Councilor Green and Commissioner Moyer

Grab a coffee and chat with Councilor Green and Commissioner Moyer about what’s happening in the city and county!

eventbrite.com

One incredibly easy way that the negotiations could get back on track is if the Blazers could respond to some of the basic requests for information we have repeatedly asked for since April but have yet to receive. Maybe Commissioner Silver can help us with that?

NBA Commissioner Adam Silver says Moda Center renovation negotiations ‘have gone off track’

“I was hoping more progress would have been made by now on that agreement," Silver said. "And it seems to have gone off track in various ways.”

oregonlive.com

Type II land use decision incoming in NW. For those following all things land use related to storage, load / unloading of asphalt and liquid fuels in the CEI Hub and adjacent area you’ll want to mark your calendar for Tuesday July 28 at 10:30 to listen to an Early Assistance meeting with PP&D.

City of Portland, Oregon
Portland Permitting & Development
Office of the Director
ric Kutch, Direct one: (503) 823-730
TTY: 711
www.portland.gov/ppd
July 14, 2026
To: Mayor Willson and Member of the Portland City Council
From: Eric Kutch, Director, Portland Permitting & Development
CC: City Administrator C. Lee Ill and Deputy City Administrator Donnie Oliveria
Subject: Overview of the upcoming Early Assistance meeting with McCall Terminals and PP&D
Background
McCall Terminals will meet with Portland Permitting & Development (PP&D) - alongside the Bureau of Planning & Sustainability (BPS),and Portland Fire & Rescue (Fire) - on July 28 for an optional early assistance to discuss the potential permitting and land use needs associated with their proposal to demolish an existing building on their property in order to extend rail infrastructure onto an adjacent property, as well as associated site, utility, piping, electrical and operational improvements.
A preliminary and unofficial review by PP&D's land use team of the application materials indicates a land use review may not be required. This pre-application conference will allow this team to further explore these pre-application materials in discussion with representatives from McCall Terminals.
McCall Terminal's Proposal
Per the pre-application materials submitted by McCall Terminal, they are proposing "an extension of the existing rail infrastructure at the NW Front Avenue terminal in Portland, Oregon. The project would include demolition of an existing building [noted 'A' in the image below*), extension of the rail yard (current rails noted 'B' in the image below*) onto the adjacent property, installation of new rail infrastructure for loading and unloading asphalt and liquid fuel product, and associated site, utility, piping, electrical, and operational improvements (general area where work will happen noted 'C' in the image below*]."
*Map of McCall Terminal site, with general locations of proposed project noted in red letters (image and italicized notations in above paragraph have been created for the purpose of this document and are not a part of the pre-application materials)
Both properties are private property owned by McCall Terminals, though the adjacent property is currently operated by Brenntag Pacific. Per pre-application materials, "The proposed improvements would increase operational flexibility and improve the terminal's ability to receive, stage, load, and unload asphalt and fuel products by rail. The Project would include demolition of the existing Brenntag building, improvements to rail infrastructure, new rail loading and unloading infrastructure, utility upgrades, stormwater improvements, and associated operational infrastructure."
Early Assistance Meeting Details
This online meeting is scheduled for Tuesday, July 28 at 10:30 a.m. for a 90-minute meeting. Participants of the meeting will include representatives from McCall Terminals, PP&D, BPS, and Fire.
The meeting will be publicly posted on Friday, July 17. The public is welcome to attend the meeting via the Zoom webinar; however, they will not be able to provide comments or otherwise participate in the meeting.
Potential Land Use Review
While we are too early in this process to make an official determination of what types of review will be needed, an early look at materials provided by McCall Terminals indicate a land use review may not be needed for this project.
Based on these details, should a review be needed, it would likely be a Type II Greenway review. Greenway Review is required for many projects that occur within the Greenway overlay zones (''n", "r", 'g", "i", and "q" overlays). The Greenway Review is required to address issues of public access,
2Decision Making Authority
In the Type Il procedure, the decision is made by PP&D staff. Upon receiving a complete application, notice of the applicant's request is mailed to all property owners within 150 feet of the site. Notice is also sent to the recognized associations within 400 feet of the site. The public comment period is 21 days. A decision will be made within 28 days of receiving a complete application. Once a decision has been made, a notice is mailed to all property owners within 150 feet of the site, to recognized organizations where the site is located and those located within 400 feet of the site, as well as to any person who submitted written comments.
The decision may be appealed by anyone, including the applicant, within 14 days of the mailing of the notice of decision. Generally, there is a fee for appealing the decision. However, there is no fee for organizations recognized by the Office of Neighborhood Involvement (typically neighborhood associations, district coalitions, and business district associations) appealing a land use decision for property within the organization's boundaries. The vote to appeal must be in accordance with the organization's bylaws.
If the decision is appealed, notice of appeal will be mailed within five days and there will be a public hearing scheduled within 21 days of that mailing. The hearing will take place in front of the Hearings Office. The decision of the Hearings Officer is final at the local level but may be appealed to the State Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA).
Next Steps
Following the meeting with McCall Terminals on Tuesday, July 28 at 10:30 a.m., written responses are completed by City reviewers identifying regulations that apply to the project. PP&D will continue to work with the team, should they choose to pursue the project and apply for relevant permits. Depending on what they ultimately decide to pursue, it may or may not trigger a land use review.

My position remains pretty straightforward: I’m not supporting a blank check for a public subsidy where both the scale and distribution of benefits are largely unknown. And I’m a hard no on PCEF as the source. We have contract protections for a reason, so let’s use them to not get screwed.

Willamette Week@wweek.com · 4w ago

Six councilors are on the ballot in November in districts 3 and 4. As it happens, polling shows those are also the districts with the most deeply held views on Moda Center funding.

I’m grateful for @counciloravalos.bsky.social leadership in prioritizing this. We each brought forward amendments in the budget that sought to address the accountability concerns with UA. Those efforts failed when six of our colleagues declined to take action, but the need for oversight remains.

Councilor Candace Avalos@counciloravalos.bsky.social · 4w ago

Tomorrow at the 7/7 Housing and Permitting Committee, we’re taking a look at the City’s shelter oversight system: what’s working, what’s being worked on, and what we can do better.

Tomorrow at Housing and Permitting Committee:  We’re looking at oversight of the City’s homeless shelter providers - including Urban Alchemy.

Graphic with picture of City Hall and text reading "On deck at H&P Committee."

Good to see the paper of record finally joining those of us who have been calling for a fair deal. It’s important to get this right. We do that by ditching the artificially short timeline the Mayor and Governor set for Council, engage the public properly and negotiate *for* Portlanders.

Editorial: Rise up to the challenge, Portland leaders, and keep the Trail Blazers here

Portland leaders and the public should not get distracted by irritation over new Trail Blazers’ owner Tom Dundon’s dismissive attitude, the editorial board writes. The city still needs to come up with...

oregonlive.com