Cristian Farias

@cristianfarias.com

Legal journalist and beachgoer. I write and talk about courts, the law, and the politics shaping them in a number of places. Working on a new thing. Signal: cristianfarias.33

In addition to having no experience in immigration, their website shows Ilya Shapiro (!) and disgraced former law prof Joshua Wright (!) as Senior Counsel. I don't think this massive contract was awarded to give immigrant children effective, zealous advocacy. burkegroup.law/our-team/

Our Team - BURKE LAW GROUP, PLLC

Our Team

burkegroup.law

Politico@politico.com · 18h ago

26-employee Texas law firm gets $150M to represent 24,000 children in immigration court

As many avid swimmers know, and I only recently and embarrassingly found out, your Speedo™️ trunks, sooner than later, will disintegrate in hyperchlorinated water. I won’t be taking questions at this time.

I like this part where the U.S. Attorney's Office pretends that they didn't watch the news for an entire month and so "first became aware" that the reflecting pool was all fucked up on July 17—over a month after it started visibly falling apart.

On July 17, 2026, as a defense expert inspected the now-drained Reflecting Pool, United States Attomey Pirro and senior USAO-DC employees once again visited the site and this time immediately noted extensive damage throughout the now-drained pool, It was at that time that USAO-DC first became aware of the significant damage throughout the pool and accordingly requested all documents from DOI concerning the how the pool was lined and all records regarding the installation of the lining

Witching hour is real. It’s a curse. There’s no escaping it. The shrieks. The stomping. The slamming of doors. The devilish laughter. The spirit of restlessness and chaos that sweeps over the home. Resistance is futile. This kind does not come out except by much prayer and fasting.

This may be the first case to apply the Harvard anti-affirmative action ruling and Louisiana v. Callais to invalidate and permanently enjoin a pair of race-conscious minority contracting programs in Houston. Case brought by white contractors represented by the Pacific Legal Foundation.

Reuters Legal@legal.reuters.com · last wk.

A federal judge on Tuesday blocked the city of Houston, Texas, from enforcing race-conscious policies governing a program that sets aside certain public contracts for minority-owned businesses after finding they were unconstitutional.

The NYT subpoena hearing is a shit show, but the best part is they tried to hide the guy who fucked up in the gallery. It is still ongoing. Judge Subramanian has asked why he shouldn't invite a show cause for contempt.

nner City Press
@innercitypress
·
12m
Buckley: We would be prepared to immunize these reporters - our focus is on the leakers.
Judge: Is Mr. Sullivan here?
Buckley: Yes. In the gallery
Judge: Why? He is on all the pleadings. Come up- we have extra chairs here. Good afternoon.
Sullivan: Good afternoon
Inner City Press
@innercitypress
·
10m
Judge: You didn't tell the judge that the subpoena was about reporters, about the New York Times?
Sullivan: We did not. It was an oversight. Later we did legal research.
Judge: Wouldn't it have been relevant to know there had been public reporting? 
A: Yes

The cherry on top of this opinion is that the Fifth Circuit sided with Exxon after a huge fire at one of its facilities, where one of its workers was basically a hero in helping firefighters contain the blaze, was left with a “textbook case of PTSD.”

Raffi Melkonian@rmfifthcircuit.bsky.social · 2w ago

OSHA lacks authority to regulate mental illness, under statutory authority to regulate workplace "illness," says CA5. www.ca5.uscourts.gov/opinions/pub...

We must determine whether the best reading of 29 U.S.C.
§ 657(c)(2), which grants OSHA authority to "prescribe regulations requiring employers to maintain accurate records of ... work-related deaths, injuries and illnesses," confers upon OSHA the power to promulgate its mental-illness recording rule. Exxon contends that § 657(c)(2) does not delegate OSHA sufficient authority to authorize the rule; OSHA disagrees. 3
Tho

This is one of the first big tests of our post-Trump v. Slaughter world—where an inferior officer appointed according to the Constitution’s design challenges a president throwing a tantrum over judges doing a job Congress has duly assigned to them.

Kyle Cheney@kyledcheney.bsky.social · 2w ago

JUST IN: Roger Rogoff, who was appointed interim US attorney by judges in Washington state and immediately fired by President Trump, is suing to block his removal. storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...

This is a setback, but as the court notes in footnote 8, the real action will be in the First Circuit, where Mohsen Mahdawi has a pending petition challenging the Trump administration's termination of his lawful permanent resident status. The case is Mahdawi v. Blanche, 26-1648. See:

assets.aclu.org

Chris Geidner@chrisgeidner.bsky.social · 2w ago

A real one-two punch from the 2nd Circuit in Moshen Mahdawi's case. The panel (all GOP appointees) held that the courts lack jurisdiction over the constitutional claim and it would have to be appealed after the immigration "court" (ie, DOJ) admin process. storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...

Before: LIVINGSTON, NARDINI, and MENASHI, Circuit Judges.
A host of federal government officials—the Respondents-Appellants—
appeal from an April 30, 2025, order of the United States District Court for the
District of Vermont ordering the release of Petitioner-Appellee Mohsen Mahdawi
from federal immigration custody pending review of his petition for a writ of
habeas corpus. Mahdawi, a lawful permanent resident of the United States, had
challenged his pre-removal detention as violating various statutes and
constitutional provisions, including the First Amendment and the Due Process
Clause of the Fifth Amendment. We conclude that Section 242(b)(9) of the
Immigration and Nationality Act, codified at 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(9), channels
Mahdawi’s claims initially to the administrative process. Accordingly, we
VACATE the district court’s order and REMAND to the district court to dismiss
the petition.
Judge Menashi joins the opinion of the court and files a concurring opinion

NYC’s small business owners have said it over and over: endless paperwork and uncertainty has made getting their stores up and running too difficult. So we’re cutting red tape, eliminating redundant permits (did you know you need a permit just to serve some ice cream?), and speeding up inspections.

Concurrently with this case: The same panel dismissed the appeal by Rümeysa Öztürk, who reached a settlement with the government to end her removal proceedings, restore her student visa as if it had never been revoked, and allow her to return to Turkey after finishing her studies, which she did.

Aaron Reichlin-Melnick@reichlinmelnick.bsky.social · 2w ago

Very bad draw for Mr. Mahdawi at the 2nd Circuit. Decision by Judge Livingston (Bush) and joined by Nardini (Trump) and Menashi (Trump) finds no jurisdiction. Except this to be taken en banc, especially as a motions panel of the 2nd Circuit previously ruled that the court DID have jurisdiction.

I truly feel for Democratic appointees to lower federal courts who are former public defenders. On the one hand, they’re bound to apply unintelligible precedent that turns them into pretend historians. On the other, they know that gun laws unevenly criminalize Black and brown people. A bad place.

Mark Joseph Stern@mjsdc.bsky.social · 3w ago

As expected, the 3rd Circuit has struck down New Jersey's assault weapons ban, becoming the first federal appeals court to find that the Second Amendment protects AR-15s. But SCOTUS will settle this issue next term, making the decision anticlimactic. www2.ca3.uscourts.gov/opinarch/242...