Andy

@crowbar-andy.bsky.social

Not a lawyer | views my own | I like to run a lot | yale ‘22 and gulc ‘25

One of the (many) problems with chest-pounding sloganeering like "maximum lethality, not tepid legality" is that you're less likely to get any benefit of the doubt when you're accused of attacking civilians.

like, i know there is basically a secular cult around this institution but who do these people think they are? who do they think they work for?

Traded a $1 bill for a copy of Victor S. Navasky’s Naming Names the other afternoon — already well worth it to read passages like these where the Sixth Amendment remained perfectly fine and intact

BildBildBild

They want us to move away from ownership to electronic access only, so they are forcing us into it with unsustainable price increases. Then they can easily dictate what we do with the online, access only versions. 3/5

The gig is up in the very first sentence of the Supreme Court's per curiam opinion on the Trump ballroom (emphasis added): "In October 2025, the *federal government* started a project to replace the East Wing of the White House." They've collapsed the legislative branch into the unitary executive.

I read “In Search of Lost Time” during the pandemic. When I finished it, I put the entire hardcover set in a backpack, and used it as a makeshift weighted vest while running up and down the staircase in my building. The latter was easily a more rewarding use of that particular roman fleuve.