Science of Health at Columbia University

@cusciofhealth.bsky.social

We aim to revolutionize biomedicine by understanding and measuring health at all scales, from biological to psychological to functional. Website: tinyurl.com/y6khjbkf See our recent paper: https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.adu8437

We intuitively know when we're healthy, yet science struggles to measure it. Our new paper bridges this gap by defining 'intrinsic health' as an emergent property of our biology. This could transform medicine & public health. #ParadigmShift www.science.org/doi/10.1126/...

Intrinsic health as a foundation for a science of health

Intrinsic health is an objective, measurable construct describing the biological capacity of the organism to self-maintain.

science.org

One protein, two opposing roles: This ‘compelling’ study shows how the same signalling molecule can drive either protrusion or retraction in migrating cells depending on its concentration and activation dynamics. buff.ly/pMGXJVM

Amazing new research from Diego Bassani: We can map networks of communities to see how ideas, diseases, and many other things spread. This produces a crucial new tool, SEEDNet, for public health research. So cool!

DGBassani@dgbassani.bsky.social · last yr.

Our paper is now published on Nature Scientific Data. I wrote a blog about the story behind SEEDNet, and our vision for it. I'll put this all together in a thread later, but for now, here is the blog.

There is a citation penalty for researchers who pivot fields, a(nother) clear example of Goodheart's Law. Over-structuring science and the competition that drives it often does more harm than good. We need to reduce competition to achieve more. www.nature.com/articles/d41...

Researchers who ‘pivot’ into new fields should not be given a citation penalty

The COVID-19 pandemic showed the value of changing direction in research. It should be incentivized, encouraged and celebrated.

nature.com