Dani From The Block

@danifromtheblock.bsky.social

Retired FBI

CHOTINER: So You created us right GOD: Yes CHOTINER: In Your image GOD: Yes CHOTINER: And sometimes we do bad things GOD: Oh Yes CHOTINER: And then you send plagues and floods GOD: OK I think I see where you are going with this

No, he was not practicing politics in exactly the right way. He was a demagogue. He was a racist, misogynistic, liar, unconcerned with any group he wasn’t part of. That he was successfully persuasive does not make him one of the good guys on the other side.

Bild

I have a couple of comments about the "free speech hero" narrative about Charlie Kirk. First, was Charlie Kirk really notable for supporting the free speech of people he disagreed with? I haven't noticed that, though I could have missed it. /1

Charlie Kirk spent his adult life spreading hate and fear. He deliberately made life harder for minorities, immigrants and those who are different. Maybe you agreed with him, maybe you didn't. But those are facts. Everyone knows it. People and organizations venerating him are telling on themselves.

Imani Gandy@angryblacklady.blacksky.app · 11mo ago

He was just, like, a guy. Not a politician. Not a statesman of any kind. Just some really mean guy. Flags at half mast. Yankee moment of silence. Whatever the shit this is. I feel like I'm taking crazy pills.

Is it really necessary to cover Charlie Kirk on every news channel? He didn’t just have different views on the capital gains tax. He was a destructive force in US politics in very malignant ways. He was killed in gun violence, that he, himself, said was worth tolerating. Who was worse? Nick Fuentes?