Dan Weir

@danweir.bsky.social

Research and Policy Manager at moneyandmentalhealth.org Rapier Instructor at londonhistoricalfencing.club Hereditary Crystal Palace fan Mostly just musing here. Views my own, reposts not endorsements etc He/Him

So, conceptually I liked the idea of the Archer story where it turns out Alaska was only leased to Russia and the lease is about to run out. Unfortunately, having found a copy (on a shelf when I moved into my current house), it turns out to be quite dull.

A lot of childcare entitlement policy is a bit weird. This is not related to the 30 free hours pledge being something the Tories came up with during the 2015 election campaign to beat Labour's 25 hours pledge, had no idea how to fund and assumed they'd trade away in a coalition agreement somehow.

Morgan GD@morgangd.com · 3d ago

All this time I've been thinking the £100k cliff edge was a combined family allowance and figured it made some sense - 50k each isnt *that* unimaginable in London/SE Apparently its that neither parent can earn over 100k? Pay for your own damn childcare.

The thing that gets me about these lurid anti-Zionist statements, like the one the Greens just passed, is that it is *so fucking easy* to criticise the Israeli government without engaging in that type of language.

Unemployment among young people is a big issue! Morally as well as economically. But you solve that by tackling mental health and looking at why the jobs aren't there for this cohort, not by treating adults like overgrown kids and going "yeah, you're your parents responsibility, kthxbai"

According to Electoral Calculus, this would put Labour in majority territory 20ish seats. I'm a little sceptical that Reform would end up this far ahead of the Tories in an actual election though. If you swapped their numbers you end up with a 50 seat Labour majority and Reform on 30 seats.

Laura Phillips@lauraphillips.bsky.social · last wk.

NEW: Westminster Voting Intention LAB 29% (+2) RFM 23% (-1) CON 19% (-2) LD 9% (-2) GRN 9% (+2) SNP 3% (=) RB 2% (=) PC 1% (-1) OTH 4% (=) F/w 29 September 2026. Changes vs 23/09/2026

Being released on bail in England doesn't usually involve a financial security or bond. I think technically it can, but it's not standard practice. But because it's used in America people assume it's the same system here.

I doubt it'll work out this way, but it'd be interesting if you could get to a state where there's cross-party agreement on what the new service will look like, and you even get a lot of the ground work done to build it - then fight the general election on how you fund it.

Jim Pickard@pickardje.bsky.social · 2w ago

am I going mad or did Andy Burnham just tell Laura Kuenssberg that he won’t reform social care this parliament and it’ll merely be a manifesto pledge in 2029?

Important caveat: ministers love to say benefit claimants shouldn’t be “written off” and it’s vital 16-24 year olds with significant physical disabilities aren’t dismissed. Some will want and be able to work but need specialist support and genuine opportunities, alongside the financial protection.

You have to talk to people you don't like. That is what diplomacy is. You can't do diplomacy if you only talk to your friends. Very occasionally, isolating a country diplomatically might be a smart move, but it's a tactical tool, not a moral imperative.

Henry Mance@henrymance.ft.com · 2w ago

Sorry, what? Diplomats talk to each other. Miliband has also spoken to his Israeli counterpart. The French foreign minister also met Araghchi this week. X is such a sewer of bad, motivated takes.

I pay less attention to the legal world these days and I'd somehow missed the Chancery division being renamed. While in fact, it's a good idea to call things what they are instead of using obfuscating language, my inner legal historian does feel a bit sad about this.

Joshua Rozenberg@joshuarozenberg.bsky.social · 2w ago

Ten new High Court judges have been appointed by the King — including some direct appointments to the court’s new Business and Property division, which replaces the Chancery division in a week’s time. rozenberg.substack.com/p/new-judges...

While I think the spring is more likely, an early election is a real possibility. I also think Badenoch's approach to Burnham is interesting. It is not in her interests for Reform to take a load of seats from Labour. She actually needs him to do fairly well.

John Rentoul@rentouljohn.bsky.social · 2w ago

Kemi Badenoch tells @iaindale.bsky.social @lbc.co.uk she thinks Andy Burnham will hold an election in December: “Andy Burnham is a gambler. I think he might fancy his chances”

I feel like there might be an interesting intersection here with people who don't realise that the US style waitress is being paid to be friendly to them and it's not real. Or who believe the claims of adverts as much as they do a documentary. Or who develop a lot of parasocial realtionships.

Marie Le Conte@youngvulgarian.marieleconte.com · 3w ago

think what's interesting about this too is that I have no sense of how others feel about this - we're clearly in a minority on this website by being stridently anti-AI, but does that really mean other people don't.....meaningfully care about the phenomenon below? I find that so weird to contemplate!

90 years ago, Parliament responded to the rise of Oswald Mosley's Blackshirts by passing the Public Order Act, which banned political uniforms, private militias and the threat of force for political objects. The debates make very resonant reading today. Here's the Liberal Robert Bernays. (Short 🧵)

You cannot conduct a fair match when one side is playing with a ball and the other with bombs and, if democracy is to survive, it must be conducted according to definite and recognised rule. One of them is that no political party should resort to any weapon other than reason and argument. The introduction of private armies, as I see it, strikes at the root of democracy. I know it is contended that the Blackshirts are not armed and, therefore, are not an army, but I do not think that argument can be upheld. … Uniformed men in military formation suggest, and are meant to suggest, the idea of force. It is no argument to reply that at this or that demonstration no force is intended. It is an inescapable fact that a uniform in politics symbolises force, to be used either now or in the future.