David Sterman

@davidsterman.bsky.social

Deputy Director, New America Future Security program

Count me on the extremely skeptical side of AQ capabilities / success q of this debate. Also think even if you view threat as high, it’s tough to argue that AQ now is Bin Laden’s AQ or a follow on of his vision. That said, think other threats have increased. www.theatlantic.com/magazine/202...

What Happened to al-Qaeda?

Twenty-five years after 9/11, analysts can’t decide if the terrorist organization is all but defunct or more threatening than ever.

theatlantic.com

Lot of focus on apparent polling misses. Seems rightly. But also think another key dynamic is the treatment of progressive media orgs and social media that had clear preferences as having analysis not deeply tainted by their priors. Also think this was a clear issue in other races too this cycle.

In a couple of days we will hit (assuming no new strikes or reports of prior strikes) 3 months since the last US strike on ISIS in Somalia. Prior to 2025, that wouldn’t be very notable but it likely reflects some kind of major change in U.S. activity under this admin.

This is actual antisemitism - not because it’s criticizing Israel, but because it attributes agency over all migration to Israel, with no evidence. This is just the Great Replacement conspiracy, and it is ultimately far-right. Such conspiracism is going to destroy the left, if it isn’t policed.

Bild

Again this is what the video that seems likely fake that people were happy to mobilize and campaign admitted picking up from Reddit wo checking seems to have looked like when circulating on Reddit. But sure let’s hear from people to lazy to check on whether Israel First here is antisemitic.

Bild

Posting now that I look at it seems quite possible it’s fake but I didn’t bother to look into it and can’t be bothered now despite good faith criticism of antisemitism just like the campaign I’m defending is some wild telling on yourself shit.

Why endlessness is not about duration but about this specific quality whether or not it is rapidly brought to an end by changing objectives. Also why I hate that people gravitate to the new-fangled and temporally focused “forever wars” language and not the well established “endless war” frame.

Ken Schultz@kschultz.bsky.social · 4d ago

When you are defeated in the sense of “unable to achieve your goals” but not defeated in the sense of “unable to continue military operations” then you are perpetually “headed for defeat” until you decide to end it. That’s how you get forever wars.

In Iran, the U.S.
Appears Headed for a Strategic Defeat, Allies
Fear

I hesitate to note this given the scale of other escalations, but folks are underrating the chance that US strikes in Somalia fall to low or even near zero numbers even as the pace has been unprecedentedly high this past year and a half or so.

Let’s be clear, it is not some coincidence, novelty, or mere symptom of online politics that a segment of Palestinian and of Spanish politics even on the left has deeply far right politics around immigration that nests easily into far right narratives.

Find it a bit odd how much in the recent week or two of Iran tensions people have drawn sharp lines or used language of novelty for things that are not new or at most an intensification of already existing dynamics.

The converse question is the one that should trouble us, I think: what kind of shared moral architecture can emerge in an international system where the most powerful state does not present as a liberal democracy

One thing about Trump’s escalation of wars this term is that they are more disconnected from conditions on the ground. most notable in Iran and drug boat strikes. In term one strikes escalated in large part due to conditions on the ground. Even exceptions like Soleimani far more tied than now.

Just noting that one of the big challenges for this article other than qs about collective action problems/ who enforces is the following: There are significant tensions between efforts to respond to proxy warfare issue and efforts to tighten self defense. www.theguardian.com/commentisfre...

What should replace the American-led world order? | Aslı Bâli and Samuel Moyn

The task now is to stop mourning the old order and build the foundations of the new multipolar world

theguardian.com

In 2026 so far, the Trump admin has bombed: —Iran—14,000+ strikes; 1 JSOC mission —Somalia—strikes on 66 days —Caribbean/E. Pacific—31 strikes —Iraq—strikes on 26+ days —Syria—strikes on 18 days —Arabian Sea—9 strikes —Nigeria—strikes on 3 days; 1 JSOC raid —Venezuela—strikes on 2 days; 1 JSOC raid

Wesley Morgan@wesleymorgan.bsky.social · 7mo ago

Year-end tally of Trump admin combat actions in 2025: —Yemen—1,000+ strikes* —Somalia—140+ strikes, 1 ground raid** —Syria—78+ strikes, 3 ground raids*** —Iran—3 B-2 strikes —Iraq—1 strike —Nigeria—1 set of TLAM strikes —Caribbean—11 strikes —Eastern Pacific—20 strikes —Venezuela—1 known CIA strike

Approaching two weeks since the last declared strike in Somalia. And coming up on twelve weeks since the last declared strike against ISIS in Somalia. Of course, strike announcements tend to lag a bit and the lags has grown somewhat recently (is my sense).