Deb Cohen

@debscohen.bsky.social

Broadcaster and writer | Senior visiting fellow, LSE | Escapee medic | Former health correspondent, BBC Newsnight | Science editor, ITV News | Investigations editor, BMJ | Scouse https://www.specialistspeakers.com/?p=16769

Totally chuffed "Bad Influence" has been shortlisted for @royalsociety.org Trivedi Science Book prize. Chair of judges Mike Benton said: “This book is both urgent and contemporary, providing much-needed insight into a currently unregulated area of health.” Congrats to everyone shortlisted

Looks like "Bad Influence" has made it onto the parliamentary reading list.... Chuffed to it cited during a Health and Social Care Sekect Committee discussion on direct-to-consumer advertising of GLP-1 drugs, influencer marketing and regulation. Loads more to say on this!

Bild

You get two science authors for the price of one when @debscohen.bsky.social and I speak next week at LSE ⬇️ (In fact it's free!) My book: how a quiet revolution in evidence has reshaped the way we make decisions Deb's book: the forces working against evidence now Sign up! 2 June bit.ly/41LH2CG

LSE Health Policy@lsehealthpolicy.bsky.social · 2mo ago

Just under a week to go. #LSEHealth hosts @helenpearson.bsky.social & @debscohen.bsky.social on 2 June — a conversation on evidence, medicine and what comes next, with audience Q&A, drinks and a book signing. 🔗 bit.ly/41LH2CG

Beyond belief event card

People on all sides of the political spectrum need and deserve access to high-quality scientific evidence. I therefore believe in a pluralistic approach to science communication activity, regardless of my own politics.

Excellent example of why expertise matters. When you find experts who make good arguments that help you better understand your world: follow them, support them, and promote them. @pwgtennant.bsky.social @debscohen.bsky.social

Peter Tennant@pwgtennant.bsky.social · 3mo ago

You may have seen this graph in the FT, which claims to show birth rates plunging since the introduction to smartphone. Except it doesn't. Read my short piece with @debscohen.bsky.social on some of the problems with this graph of juicy cherries! unherd.com/newsroom/are...

FT graphic by John Burn-Murdoch entitled 'could digital media be affecting birth rates?'

Chuffed to be speaking at this Royal Society of Med event w Marion Nestle & Naomi Oreskes who brilliantly exposed food & tobacco playbooks I’ll be exploring the influencer playbook-- inc rise of medfluencers who have drifted from sensible advice into being the purveyors of nutritional snake oil.

Bild

This recent RCT of an "AI stethoscope" claims the technology "shows promise" for diagnosing cardiovascular conditions. It does not. It is a textbook example of the risks of conducting unprincipled 'per protocol analyses'. Once again, peer review at a major medical journal has failed. 🧵 1/

The Lancet@thelancet.com · 5mo ago

AI-enabled stethoscopes show promise for improving diagnosis of cardiovascular conditions, UK trial finds. Explore the research: spkl.io/63326AsjJ8

Graph showing use of AI stethoscope examinations (cardiac waveform recordings for AI interpretation) among recruited GP practices in the intervention group (n=96) during the first 12 months of implementation. Stacked bars represent the number of practices (y-axis, left) stratified by usage intensity category: high users (≥31 uses per month), medium users (10–30 uses per month), low users (<10 uses per month), and non-users (0 uses per month). Darker shades within each bar denote higher usage categories, with high users shown in the darkest shade. The overlaid line graph indicates cumulative number of AI stethoscope examinations (y-axis, right) over 12 months, with numbers above each bar denoting the total number of onboarded practices at that timepoint. AI=artificial intelligence. GP=general practitioner.

Before made FDA head, Marty Makary told me of “fierce lobbying effort” behind “early cancer detection”. “But is there net public health benefit or harm?” At time, he'd seen “no substantial evidence” Galleri improved this. Will the NHS trial change that? www.bmj.com/content/392/...

Galleri cancer tests: Controversial NHS trial fails to meet key goal

A controversial blood test that promises to detect multiple cancers in their early stages failed to meet a key trial endpoint of a significant reduction in stage III-IV cases. Investors in the US com...

bmj.com

Before made FDA head, Marty Makary told me of “fierce lobbying effort” behind “early cancer detection”. “But is there net public health benefit or harm?” At the time, he'd seen “no substantial evidence” Galleri improved public health. Will NHS trial change that? www.bmj.com/content/392/...

Galleri cancer tests: Controversial NHS trial fails to meet key goal

A controversial blood test that promises to detect multiple cancers in their early stages failed to meet a key trial endpoint of a significant reduction in stage III-IV cases. Investors in the US com...

bmj.com