Katie Turner

@katieturnerphd.com

Historian: 1st Century Material Culture | New Testament Reception | Religion & Pop-Culture | Clothing, Costume, Film Co-Host: www.GodsAndMoviemakers.com More about me: www.KatieTurnerPhD.com

Christian anti-Judaism and orientalism excised Jewish ppl from the Roman Empire + reimagined a Biblical never-never period characterised by pseudo-Islamic material culture. Yada…yada…yada… And that’s how we get this guy👇

Post nicht verfügbar.

This was a very fun one to write. Rule of open questions in headlines applies. Many thanks to the various institutional policies which allow image publication rights in scientific publications and the DAI which offered high quality photographs for a low fee

Katie Turner @katieturnerphd.com · 4w ago

Publication day is one of my favourite days! Even better when its shared with a friend (@josephscales.bsky.social) Hot off the presses: "Did the Romans Think Jews Wore Trousers?" brill.com/view/journal...

Abstract
It is well established that Jews in the ancient Mediterranean were indistinguishable from their neighbours in terms of their dress behaviours. As Greco-Roman clothing (of the Second Temple era) did not include trousers, one should not expect to see representations of Jewish bodies in artwork of the period where they are depicted as wearing trousers. Yet, there are three such representations of Jewish trouser-wearers claimed in scholarship. The first is found on the enigmatic Bacchius Iudaeus issue, the second on a Titus capta issue, while the third is found on a Flavian period cuirass. This article will examine whether any of these images can credibly be claimed to be depictions of captured or submissive Jews, which would imply that Roman and particularly Flavian authorities intended to use the image of the trousers to associate the Jews with “barbarians,” most particularly in their defeat.

Keywords: Judaea Capta; Bacchius Iudaeus; clothing; dress; propaganda; Flavians; iconography

Burnham is an utter charlatan. No truly left leaning politician would dismiss the University sector, or its users, to this extent. Happy to push the trades but unwilling to invest in higher education. "University for me but not for thee". Happy to take an extra 9% tax off my daughter though.

Good government should provide opportunities that suit individuals not favouring one type of further education over another. Then we have both vocational skilled employment AND scientists, authors, linguists, etc. 16 year olds shouldn’t have to pick a forever route when they will work till 75.

Why does Labour hate workers when they work in teaching, and social mobility if it comes via education? How many Labour MPs send their own kids to Uni, while supporting policies that reduce that opportunity for others? How many 10s of 1000s of people need to lose jobs before Labour cares?

Three #Roman leather shoes, for (l-r) a man, woman, & child. Found in an ancient well at Bar Hill fort on the Antonine Wall (Scotland), they're beautifully crafted pieces of footwear, & show that the military communities had access to a bit of luxury even on the frontiers... #AncientBlueSky

Bild

I live across the street from David Bowie's childhood home. It's been a fun little fact since moving in 8 yrs ago. That all changed in January. Since then, I've found myself someplace I *never* thought I'd be: tired of Bowie. A 🧵 on celebrity, cultural memory, and community engagement...

David Bowie childhood home plans opposed by neighbours

A heritage group wants to build a visitor centre in the garden of the star's childhood home in Bromley.

bbc.co.uk

I live across the street from David Bowie's childhood home. It's been a fun little fact since moving in 8 yrs ago. That all changed in January. Since then, I've found myself someplace I *never* thought I'd be: tired of Bowie. A 🧵 on celebrity, cultural memory, and community engagement...

David Bowie childhood home plans opposed by neighbours

A heritage group wants to build a visitor centre in the garden of the star's childhood home in Bromley.

bbc.co.uk

The more I learn, the more convinced I am that certain concepts are considered “Modern” simply because the people who studied them were/are scholars of Modernity (and haven’t looked far enough back in time).