Hal Daumé III

@haldaume3.bsky.social

Human-centered AI #HCAI, NLP & ML. Director TRAILS (Trustworthy AI in Law & Society) and AIM (AI Interdisciplinary Institute at Maryland). Formerly Microsoft Research NYC. Fun: 🧗🧑‍🍳🧘⛷️🏕️. he/him.

Come join TRAILS as a postdoc at UMD (and work w folks at GW, MSU & Cornell) to conduct research and scholarship focused on approaches to AI that advance trust and trustworthiness with a great group of colleagues! 🌐 go.umd.edu/trails-postd... 🗓️ Summer/Fall 2026 start

TRAILS UMD Post Doctoral Associate Job Description - Spring 2026

Post Doctoral Associate Institute for Trustworthy AI in Law & Society February 2026 The Institute for Trustworthy AI in Law & Society (TRAILS) and the University of Maryland aim to transform the pr...

go.umd.edu

What should Machine Translation research look like in the age of multilingual LLMs? Here’s one answer from researchers across NLP/MT, Translation Studies, and HCI. "An Interdisciplinary Approach to Human-Centered Machine Translation" arxiv.org/abs/2506.13468

An Interdisciplinary Approach to Human-Centered Machine Translation

Machine Translation (MT) tools are widely used today, often in contexts where professional translators are not present. Despite progress in MT technology, a gap persists between system development and...

arxiv.org

BREAKING: A federal judge in Massachusetts (the Reagan-appointed William Young) has declared the Trump administration's cuts to NIH grants — ostensibly over Trump's EOs on gender ideology and DEI — are "illegal" and "void." He's ordering many grants restored.

slashing support for grad students and undergraduates by 75% is a disastrous policy for US science and competitiveness.

Dr. David Miller 🏳️‍🌈@davidimiller.bsky.social · last yr.

🚨🚨 Friday night news drop from National Science Foundation!! 🧪 NSF just released its detailed budget request for next year: nsf-gov-resources.nsf.gov/files/00-NSF... We knew it was going to be bad...and it lives up. Guts direct NSF support for a **quarter million people** 🧵 on some highlights...

Senior Researchers 60,400 --> 16,900
Other Professionals 14,400  --> 4,100
Postdoctoral Associates 5,500  --> 1,000
Graduate Students 41,500  --> 12,400
Undergraduate Students 37,300  --> 8,000
PreK-12 Teachers 42,900  --> 8,200
PreK-12 Students 128,100  --> 39,400
Total Number of People 330,100  --> 90,000

This is an incredibly well thought out and well written statement co-signed by a large group of subreddits on the importance of academic research. I hate how it had to come about, but love the statement. (And yes, this is the one that I had terminated 12 days ago.)

Sarah Gilbert@sarahagilbert.bsky.social · last yr.

A week and a half ago, my research team learned our grant was among the hundreds terminated. We were working with AH and a few other subs to build a mod tool. I was devastated. The AH mod team rose to action to use it's platform to advocate for the pursuit of knowledge, and that gives me hope.

I am reading this correctly right? Broadening participation at NSF may target non-protected groups but cannot target protected groups? It’s almost as if the issue isn’t with broadening participation but rather with which groups have been designated as protected over the past 60 years.

US tech firms - IME - rely heavily on grads of higher ed in general, and US higher ed in particular... And yet I've not heard much noise from the Pichais, Nadellas, Zuckerbergs, Cooks, Benioffs, Sus, Jassys, Huangs, etc. about attacks on higher education... Am I missing it or does it not exist?

There is a new version of the Research Plan for NIST's AI Safety Consortium (AISIC) in response to EOs. I did a diff. Out: safety, responsibility, sociotechnical, fairness, working w fed agencies, authenticating content, watermarking, RN of CBRN, autonomous replication, ctrl of physical systems >

Page one of diff.Page 2 of diff.Page 3 of diff.

With all this uncertainty in the US science funding landscape, what I really hope is that we - as panelists who review proposals - continue to review according to what we think are the strongest proposals and do not anticipatorily comply with directions that are not *specifically* required of us.

📢 The survey 👇 on "intelligence" & ChatGPT is open until Jan 14. All fields are welcome, but a special invitation goes to folks in Philosophy, Psychology, HCI, Cognitive Science, CSS, and AI ethics. Please repost.

Bertram Højer@brtrm.bsky.social · 2y ago

What do YOU mean by "intelligence", and does ChatGPT fit your definition? We collected the major criteria used in CogSci and other fields, and designed a survey to find out! Access link: www.survey-xact.dk/collect Code: 4S7V-SN4M-S536 Time: 5-10 mins