Tama Leaver

@tamaleaver.bsky.social

🎓 Professor of Internet Studies, Curtin Uni (Boorloo/Perth West Australia); 🔎 @digitalchildau.bsky.social (GenAI & Datafication); 🐘 @tama@aoir.social; he/him. [Views mine; RT/❤️/etc ≠ endorsement]

For reasons mysterious to me, Will Stancil is continuing his crash out about language used to describe LLMs, moving on from raning about "stochastic parrots" to picking up on this piece that @nannainie.bsky.social and I published earlier this summer: buttondown.com/maiht3k/arch... >>

How to talk about "AI" without adding to the anthropomorphization

Emily M. Bender and Nanna Inie In our op-ed for Tech Policy Press ("We Need to Talk About How We Talk About 'AI'"), we made the case against the...

buttondown.com

Just when I think I can’t hate OpenAI and Sam Altman any more, new details come out about how ChatGPT helped a shooter plan one of the worst mass shootings in Canadian history in Tumbler Ridge, BC. OpenAI made an explicit decision not to report the user to authorities.

ChatGPT helped the Tumbler Ridge school shooter focus on guns, tactics, and terror, our investigation reveals

OpenAI’s chatbot fed the shooter’s violent fantasies and planning up to the massacre.

motherjones.com

I sincerely hope they don’t do this. If it can go in Hansard it can go on the Internet. Parliamentary hearings are on the public record. Additionally, if politicians/bureaucrats feel targeted for harrassment, we have several state & federal laws to deal with that www.theguardian.com/australia-ne...

Bureaucrats urge Albanese to ban social media clips taken from parliament to save them from ‘ridicule’

Secretaries board concerned material posted without proper context as Greens warn ban could result in lack of transparency

theguardian.com

#Meta settling the big case about child safety in the US looks like it will meaningfully improve teen safety on Instagram & Facebook, but will also put a lot of onus on parents to actively use Meta's parenting tools, & seeks to force TikTok & YouTube make similar changes.

Our Agreement With Bipartisan Attorneys General: Calling on TikTok and YouTube to Join Us in Supporting Teens | Tama Leaver

Meta have clearly started to pay attention to the global sentiment that the company have never done enough to protect their youngest users, and have settled the massive court case in the US, agreeing to make significant changes to their apps (Facebook and Instagram), but escaping the legal precedent that would be set if they'd lost the case. The changes agreed to include time limits for teens (2hrs max, but that can be disabled by parents), blocking notifications at night and during 'school time', the choice to have a feed "that isn’t personalized by our recommendation systems", the option to disable autoplay on videos, likes/reactions hidden by default, and some smaller changes. These changes are a significant step in the right direction. They also put a huge onus on parents to actively have parental supervision set up and be on top of what might be a quite complicated parenting dashboard. That presumes a level of digital literacy not all parents have, so a lot of support (ideally funded by Meta) will be needed as parents take this on. Meta also tried to make their problem also TikTok and YouTube's problem by having over $US5 billion that's conditional on those platforms making similar changes. It very strategically distributes the load and is there to stop teens just going to less regulated spaces. It's cynical on one level, but may actually do a lot to help teens have better experiences across more of the big platforms, which is probably a net positive. Lots more to digest, but the big takeaway is that Meta is now responding to global calls to make their platforms safer for under18s. That's so important. Other platforms should follow and perhaps competing to have the best balance of safety and privacy should be the new competitive advantage to seek! Many adults will likely want these options, too. Meta's Post about the Settlement: https://lnkd.in/gndY9kGy Clear Summary of the Settlement from The Verge: https://lnkd.in/ges2aeQb [#meta #settlement #childrensrights ARC Centre of Excellence for the Digital Child Curtin University Faculty of Humanities]

lnkd.in

It's 4.30pm on Friday afternoon and I just finished yesterday's To Do list. I have a full list for today ... now I have to figure out which thing(s) will actually get done. Peer reviews? Maybe not. Grant review. I guess yes. Other things ... will be coming home for the weekend, I suppose. :(

Grammarly is no longer a friendly tool to help people become better writers, it is now a full on AI-plagiarism machine. I wrote a blog post showing how Grammarly's Expert review feature (discontinued yesterday) presented fake versions of academics without permission. jilltxt.net/grammarly-ge...

Grammarly generated fake expert reviews “by” real scholars

Grammarly is a full on AI plagiarism machine now, generating text, citations (often irrelevant), “humanizing” the text to avoid AI checkers and so on. If you’re an author or schol…

jilltxt.net

This remains vital to remember: nobody knows if Australian's Under16 Social Media Ban will actually work (ie have a positive impact on under16s) and nobody will be able to judge that meaningfully for years (not days, not months).

Post nicht verfügbar.

🚨CFP: The ADM+S Generative Authenticity project is hosting a small scholarly symposium on Authenticity, Generative AI and Synthetic Media on 6-7 May at QUT Kelvin Grove (and hybrid node). Short abstracts due 9 March. All info and the submission form: docs.google.com/document/d/1...

CFP: ADM+S Generative Authenticity Symposium

Call for Papers Authenticity, Generative AI and Synthetic Media: An ADM+S Symposium 6-7 May 2026, QUT Kelvin Grove, Brisbane Authenticity is often at the centre of concer...

docs.google.com

Zoë Hitzig's piece in the NYTimes really hits home why OpenAI's inevitable, but even more intrusive, shift to deploying ads in ChatGPT shows (a) an exploitation of private data that eclipses even social media platforms; & (b) that there really are no new ideas coming out of AI companies at all.

Text from article in the New York Times by Zoë Hitzig:

For several years, ChatGPT users have generated an archive of human candor that has no precedent, in part because people believed they were talking to something that had no ulterior agenda. Users are interacting with an adaptive, conversational voice to which they have revealed their most private thoughts. People tell chatbots about their medical fears, their relationship problems, their beliefs about God and the afterlife. Advertising built on that archive creates a potential for manipulating users in ways we don’t have the tools to understand, let alone prevent.