Jay Willis

@jaywillis.net

I write about courts, democracy, media, and the raccoon family living in a tree behind my house. Bluesky’s ONLY fantasy football guru. EIC @ballsandstrikes.org, more writing at jaywillis.net.

Hit a paywall on that dogshit ‘Lonesome Dove’ blog and started grinning like Jake Spoon when he sees a card game with an empty chair

When you teach boys how to pee standing up and outside, it’s essential to also convey that this should be a clandestine activity. This post brought to you by the doorbell video clip of my 3-year-old son wordlessly walking outside, dropping his pants, and peeing all over the front patio.

Cal leading by 5 points and coming out in the “five guys defending the goal line” defense with *10 seconds left* and the ball on the Cal 27 was one of the funniest plays I’ve ever seen. Just conceding 20 yards and a Virginia Tech first and goal to win the game for no reason. Beautiful.

20-yd Pass
0:06 - 4th
Shotgun #17 E.Grunkemeyer pass complete short left to #5
M.Jackson caught at CAL16, for 20 yards to the CAL07, out of bounds at CALO7, 1ST DOWN
Ist & 10 at CAL 27
Incompletion
0:06 - 4th
Shotgun #17 E.Grunkemeyer pass incomplete short middle to #85 L.Reynolds thrown to CALOO broken up by #20
A.Emory
Ist & Goal at CAL 7
End of 4th quarter.

The color guy for the Cal game was the baby brother in the family down the street from me. His oldest brother coached my eighth grade basketball team and he’d toddle around on the sidelines all practice. Anyway, I am one million years old.

Max Brown calling a football game

“This guy sucks and we are trading him. Where, you ask? Doesn’t matter, don’t worry about it” is, if nothing else, extremely funny

An absolutely exquisite experience is getting pulled over in the freeway carpool lane, only to hit the trooper with the SURPRISE 3-YEAR-OLD

A selfie of me and my son with cops behind us

Feels to me like the U.S. government livestreaming the shooting death of a guy in a wheelchair is going to be in all the history books, and hopefully framed as the end of an era that was very bad, and not the start of an era that was much, much worse

Pretty dishonest for Puck to describe Supreme Court expansion as an "unpopular position that could motivate the GOP base and alienate independents" when *the very same post* cites a poll finding support for expansion at +6 overall and +12 among independents puck.news/the-dems-cou...

Interestingly, the most recent discussions are being driven by centrists hoping to preempt a more radicalbacklash. Third Way, the center-left think tank, is urging moderate Democrats to back common-sensereforms to prevent the left from pushing court expansion, an unpopular position that could motivate theG.O.P. base and alienate independents. Instead, Third Way executive
Lanae Erickson
is suggesting thatDems pass legislation that would place 18-year term limits on justices—a cadence that would eventually leadto the appointment of two new justices every presidential term. The proposed reforms would allow thosewho have completed a full term to step in and hear cases on the lower court, or when a justice recusesthemselves from a case. “If we are going to win in 2028, we have to show that we can meet voters wherethey are in terms of their level of anger and their desire for reforms,” said Erickson. “I think if the center left isseen as just aligned with the establishment, saying
Let’s just put things back together the way they were ayear and a half ago—
we’re going to get beat by the bigger ideas on the left.”

One of the 5-year-old’s soccer coaches is out of town so I filled in at practice tonight. Most humbling 45 minutes of my life. Broke up two crying scuffles over the orange cone. Some blood. Never really reestablished possession. I need to lie down for a while.

I don't think the Supreme Court is going to get rid of same-sex marriage tomorrow, but when the justice who says that overturning a landmark case is "not realistic" is the *same guy who wrote the opinion overturning Roe v. Wade*, you should not take anything he says seriously

Sam Alito Wants You to Forget How the Conservative Legal Movement Always Works

Activists are chipping away at the Supreme Court’s decision in Obergefell because Alito told them exactly how to do it.

ballsandstrikes.org

Pretty wild to see Alito describe reliance on Obergefell as "much more concrete" than reliance on Roe v. Wade, because Roe was merely about "women's ideas about the kind of society that they were going to live in." If it's a Ladies Issue, he just doesn't give a shit. www.cbsnews.com/news/samuel-...

"One of the important factors we take into account in deciding whether we should reexamine a past decision is the degree to which there has been reliance on the decision," he said. "Obviously a great deal had changed in the country as a result of Obergefell. There was a lot of reliance in various ways on the decision in Obergefell." 

I pointed out that people thought Roe v. Wade was settled law of the land, had organized their lives around it. Overturning Roe also would have consequences.

Obergefell, he said, was different. 

"After Obergefell, people of the same sex got married and entered into contracts … it was much more concrete," he said. "Whereas with Roe, the argument was made that it had an effect on people's ideas, women's ideas about the kind of society that they were going to live in, that this would have an effect on the society. It was much more abstract than what would've been involved had we been asked to overrule Obergefell."

I believe Sam Alito wants and hopes to stay on the Supreme Court. Given that he is a lifelong Republican who loves Trump and can't stop flying coup-adjacent flags above his various homes, I also believe that if Democrats win the Senate, he is going to think very, very hard about quitting.

Supreme Court’s Alito Will Stay Even If Democrats Win Senate (1)

Justice Samuel Alito said he plans to remain on the Supreme Court even if Democrats capture the Senate in next month’s midterms, dismissing speculation that he might quickly retire to ensure Donald Tr...

news.bloomberglaw.com

ME WINNING A FAAB BID: I am the savviest fantasy football player of all time. This player is a potential league-winner. No one understands the market like me. ME LOSING A FAAB BID: Wow. Egregious overpay. I mean, I like the player, but not at THAT price, am I right? Really shocking stuff.