How strong is the threat to academic freedom? If you are a publishing psychologist, please help us get a better understanding of the threats due to external pressure and self-censorship in the publication process by taking our 5-10 min anonymous survey: t1p.de/t1qof Results will be shared here!

What happens when a lottery determines which proposals for third-party funding get reviewed? Details here (#OpenAccess and fresh off the press): doi.org/10.1038/s414...

Lottery before peer review is associated with increased female representation and reduced estimated economic cost in a German funding line - Nature Communications

The authors show evidence from a German funding line that a lottery-first approach followed by peer review is accompanied by increased female representation both at the submission stage and among fund...

doi.org

David S Stolz@david-s-stolz.bsky.social · 10mo ago

Full author list: @finnluebber.bsky.social @soerenkrach.bsky.social @fmpaulus.bsky.social Lena Rademacher (not on Bluesky) and @rimamrahal.bsky.social

Thinking about applying for GYA membership but still have questions? Then join us 22 August from 13:00 – 14:30 UTC for an informational webinar featuring GYA members and Executive Committee members! Register here: leopoldina-org.zoom.us/meeting/regi... More info and QR registration 👇👇👇

I love 𝐁𝐢𝐠 𝐓𝐞𝐚𝐦 𝐒𝐜𝐢𝐞𝐧𝐜𝐞 projects, bringing together many minds to tackle a questions together 🙏 But leading a project with many coauthors also comes with a particular set of ✨challenges✨. Here are our recommendations for taking the lead for a many-authored publication: doi.org/10.1371/jour...

Just published in Forschung & Lehre: Our take on 𝐡𝐨𝐰 𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐞𝐚𝐫𝐜𝐡 𝐟𝐮𝐧𝐝𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐜𝐚𝐧 𝐝𝐨 𝐛𝐞𝐭𝐭𝐞𝐫. Given current international developments restricting academic freedom through grant reallocations, we use this opportunity to speak up for 𝐟𝐚𝐢𝐫𝐞𝐫 𝐟𝐮𝐧𝐝𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐜𝐞𝐬𝐬𝐞𝐬. 🔗 www.forschung-und-lehre.de/forschung/gu...

Gute Forschungs-Förderung braucht Erforschung!

Peer-Review-Verfahren kommen immer wieder zu suboptimalen, verzerrten Entscheidungen. Wie lässt sich die Vergabe von Forschungsmitteln verbessern?

forschung-und-lehre.de

Now published: Our paper investigating cognitive processes of ingroup favoritism across 20 countries. Free to read (hashtag#OpenAccess) at www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2417456122

We’re beyond honored to receive the SIPS Mission Award 🏆 & thrilled to have received 5 SIPS Commendations 🏆 for projects across our 4 core pillars: Metascience, Social Justice & DEIA, Community, and Education in OS. We are so grateful to all contributors who made this possible 💜 [All links below]

Society for the Improvement of Psychological Science (SIPS)@improvingpsych.org · last yr.

We are very pleased to announce the 2025 Commendations for the Society for the Improvement of Psychological Science! Join us in celebrating the exceptional projects that have revolutionized the field of psychological science. buff.ly/rzTeLYL

In Deutschland wird leidenschaftlich über mögliche Änderungen an den Strukturen der wissenschaftlichen Zusammenarbeit diskutiert. Das Ziel ist, die vielfältigen Verführungen zum Machtmissbrauch, die das gegenwärtige deutsche System beinhaltet, stärker zu beschränken.

Diese Woche kuratiere ich den Account von Real Scientists Deutschland @realscientists.de. Die Idee: zeigen, wer und was bei Wissenschaft dahinter steckt. Wenn ihr Lust habt, über meine Arbeit und meinen Alltag zu lesen, schaut vorbei ⬇️

Pause @ Real Scientists DE@realscientists.de · last yr.

[Admin] Wie Unterschiede zwischen Personen und Kulturen Entscheidungsprozesse beeinflussen! Begrüßt unsere neue Kuratorin ‪@rimamrahal.bsky.social‬‬! realscientistsde.blogspot.com/2025/07/wie-...

💎 Diamond 💎 #OpenAccess (no fee to read, no fee to publish) is sparking hope for solving parts of the dilemma of sharing research without feeding for-profit publishers. In a PLOS webinar, we discussed if and how we might ✨ achieve the impossible (?) ✨ of making change towards Diamond OA.

🍀#morethanluck Rethinking Research Funding Making a splash: What are challenges involved with changing the way research is funded? Join via zoom 🔗https://bit.ly/fundingluck ⬇️ Program for Today ⬇️

🍀#morethanluck Rethinking Research Funding Experience from practice. Are alternatives to classical funding allocation procedures proving their worth? Join via zoom 🔗https://bit.ly/fundingluck ⬇️ Today's program ⬇️

Events - Universität Bielefeld

Events at ZiF, Dates, Conferences, what is happening when?

bit.ly

🍀#morethanluck Rethinking Research Funding Today we're focused on the essentials: Does the we currently allocate research funding make sense? Join via zoom 🔗https://bit.ly/fundingluck ⬇️ Program ⬇️

🍀#morethanluck Rethinking #Research Funding workshop tomorrow! Public program + Zoom 🔗https://bit.ly/fundingluck Program ⬇️ 🍀Jul 1: Essentials. Does the way we fund research make sense? 🍀Jul 2: Practice. How are funders dealing with challenges? 🍀Jul 3: Future. How can research funding work better?

🍀 More than Luck: Rethinking Research Funding 💵 Research costs money. Are we making the most of it? 🔗 Program & Zoom Access: bit.ly/fundingluck #MetaScience #OpenScience #SciencePolicy

Will I see you for #SIPS2025? If you're around on Wednesday, come drop by at our #hackaton where we'll work on (re)writing the book ✏📖 on Social Psychology creating an Open Educational Resource. We will document shifts in the field and revisit classic studies in light of recent replication efforts.

Society for the Improvement of Psychological Science (SIPS)@improvingpsych.org · last yr.

Join us for the exciting unconferences during #SIPS2025 in Budapest on June 25-27! We will be discussing #OpenScience, AI, replication studies, critical thinking, integrity, transparency, trust, community, peer review, public engagement, preprints, the future of SIPS, and more! #PsychSciSky

Intuitive deontology? Here’s our new ✨ meta-analysis ✨ on whether intuition favors rule-following over sacrificial welfare-maximization. Spoiler: It’s complicated. doi.org/10.1037/bul0... Free version: hdl.handle.net/21.11116/000... with Alina Fahrenwaldt, Jerome Olsen & @susafiedler.bsky.social

EADM is now on BlueSky. We will post about JDM news, papers, and events (like spudm2025.imtlucca.it, see you there)

Home

The 2025 “Subjective Probability, Utility, and Decision Making” meeting will be held at the IMT School for Advanced Studies Lucca. It will take place from August 31st to September 4th 2025 and will ...

spudm2025.imtlucca.it

📖 Open Social Psychology Textbook 📖 Call for Contributors 🙋🏻‍♀️ New FORRT initiative to develop an open-access textbook on social psychology. Goal: summarize 🏛️ classical findings 🏛️ and discuss them in light of replication attempts. 🧵 Find out how you can get involved below 👇

JOIN OUR TEAM! Seeking a PhD candidate to become part of the Institute for Cognition and Behavior at WU Vienna. 📷 wirtschaftsuniversitaet-wien-portal.rexx-systems.com/Teaching-and... Spread the word! 📷📷 for details. (1/4)

Job opportunity Teaching and Research Associate at Wirtschaftsuniversität Wien Jobportal

others in Wien

wirtschaftsuniversitaet-wien-portal.rexx-systems.com

Week 2 in the US — a trip to NYC! Presented our #EyeTracking research on discrimination at #SJDM2024. Now swapping skyscrapers for gorges as I head back to Cornell. Loving this mix of ideas and places 🥰

Hello #neuroeconomists and decision (neuro)scientists - did I miss you in this starterpack? Just reply to this post or DM if you'd like to be added! go.bsky.app/1K9Suh

‘A place of joy’: why scientists are joining the rush to Bluesky For me, it certainly feels good to be here! @natureportfolio.bsky.social @bsky.app www.nature.com/articles/d41...

‘A place of joy’: why scientists are joining the rush to Bluesky

Researchers say the social-media platform — an alternative to X — offers more control over the content they see and the people they engage with.

nature.com

Long time in the making 🧪, published today: Can people catch liars? Probably not -- lie detection accuracy was as good as a coin flip. But could we turn people's physical responses into a lie detector of sorts? We tried, and we found no evidence that it works: www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti...

Your lies don't leave me cold: Assessing direct, indirect and physiological measures of lie detection

People tend to be bad at detecting lies: When explicitly asked to infer whether others tell a lie or the truth, people often do not perform better tha…

sciencedirect.com

Pumpkins are such a mood 😳 #1: Melting into a sad puddle of despair 🫠

🚨Excited that our meta-analysis is out in JPSP @APA_Journals. We synthesized 6 decades (1958-2017) of empirical evidence on social dilemmas and tested which structural features (most strongly) promote cooperation: doi.org/10.1037/pspi... 1/10

Just in time to catch the last bit of fall foliage at Cornell — Big Red indeed.

I’ve made a Women in Econ starter pack (s/o @vinisingh.bsky.social for sparking the idea!). Share, follow, and comment below if you’d like to be added! go.bsky.app/LqBPkQZ

Let me know if you're a social psychologist and would like to be added to this starter pack. go.bsky.app/B5LmAbf

Looking for a #postdoc Starting date is soon!! Here‘s a broad description of the project www.rsm.nl/news/detail/.... The postdoc will be mainly involved in designing and testing the label in lab and field studies! @sjdm-tweets.bsky.social