Paul Johnson

@pjtheeconomist.bsky.social

From August, Provost, The Queen’s College, Oxford. Previously director, Institute for Fiscal Studies. Author “Follow the Money”

It was inspiring speaking with the apprentices. A really impressive group of young people. All genuinely passionate about what they were doing. But my goodness so tough to get the apprenticeships. According to the employers and colleges 100+ applicants for each place.

Angela 🐱💙 💛🌻@hollia.bsky.social · last wk.

@pjtheeconomist.bsky.social Just wanted to say how much I've enjoyed listening to your pieces on apprenticeships on #BBCPM this week. So many enthusiastic young people enjoying what they're doing. 👏 Comment from @evanhd.bsky.social saying how shockingly good you were at reporting made me 🤭

“Where they have been implemented in other countries, rent controls have led to lower availability of private rental housing, reductions in quality, and more households living in properties that do not suit their needs.” ifs.org.uk/articles/do-...

Do rent controls work? | Institute for Fiscal Studies

We highlight the key theoretical predictions about rent controls and summarise what empirical research reveals about their effects in practice.

ifs.org.uk

The Amelia Fletcher episode of the excellent Econ to Icon podcast notes just how competitive UK supermarkets are internationally (and hence how much lower prices are). I hope cost of living policies don't take the form od distortionary price controls in the grocery market.

Paul Johnson@pjtheeconomist.bsky.social · 4mo ago

I’m lost for words. Never thought I’d see UK govt trying to set food prices. This is a hugely efficient and competitive sector. What about knock on effects on other prices, smaller shops etc And of course say they want to protect farmers. Please be serious

Agree with all this excellent advice from @chrisgiles.ft.com - don’t try to cut inflation through subsidies - don’t use accounting fiddles to raise defence spending - don’t use “flexibility” in fiscal rules - do focus on whole economy, not manufacturing - don’t heap even more tax on high earners

Chris Giles@chrisgiles.ft.com · 2mo ago

should avoid. Number 1 is something the new PM seems unable to grasp... www.ft.com/content/9df2...

Mr Burnham seems to have suggested: - raising income tax personal allowance; - much more spending on social care; - more defence spending (Healey as ChX); - no end to triple lock; - keeping to fiscal rules; - etc Either he can’t deliver this or we’re in for big tax hikes

Me on interim report of pensions commission. - fails to mention (huge) impact of immigration; - overstates problem of cashing out pension pots; - in my view is misleading on tax relief; - doesn't address affordability of higher pension contributions for low earners www.thetimes.com/business/eco...

Experts looking at pensions policy need to see the full picture

The interim report from a government commission ignores the implications of immigration, is unfair to the wealthy and expects too much of lower earners

thetimes.com

Three ways to improve high streets by *raising* business rates: 1. Higher rates on long-empty shops, to force realistic rents 2. End exemption for charity shops. 3. Make landlords pay when candy/vape shops vanish with unpaid rates. They'll ensure rates are paid up-front.

Our quickfire thoughts on what the Milburn review means for cities and how the Govt should think about the opportunities for young people in its urban agenda. As an aside, refreshing to go through a 200+ page Review that is so incisive and well-written 🤯 Thread to follow 👇

Centre for Cities@centreforcities.bsky.social · 4mo ago

More than one million young people are now not in education, employment or training. Our response to the Milburn Review argues that place matters, and that cities will be central to any long-term solution to the NEET challenge 👇 buff.ly/Jfhvfd3

"Challenging Inequalities". Do buy it! Will Hutton has just called it "one of the great works of social science this century". It is also according to @matthewsyed.bsky.social a "wonderfully clear and readable little book". Paul Collier: "a superb critique of British public policy"

Princeton University Press@princetonupress.bsky.social · 5mo ago

@pjtheeconomist.bsky.social's Challenging Inequalities takes a comprehensive look at inequalities and why they matter. Out now! Learn more: press.princeton.edu/books/hardco... #Sociology

Challenging Inequalities: How We Got Stuck and Where We Go Next by Paul Johnson

Quite. We have lost more than 1% GDP in fuel duty over last 20 years. Every chancellor for 15 years has promised at least to maintain real value of duty. Not one has done so. And now this govt backs down at first sign of trouble. Expensive & poorly targeted

Ben Zaranko@benzaranko.bsky.social · 4mo ago

IMF staff approve of the UK government's "prudent" approach towards energy support - so far. A cut/freeze in fuel duties (i.e. a broad based price subsidy, that wouldn't be time limited) would run contrary to their advice.

Remarkable chart showing huge differences in effects of min wage. More than a quarter at or near min wage in places like Doncaster (where it’s >80% of median). Just one in ten in Reading, Oxford etc. where it’s <60% of median. Obvious risks to some labour markets.

Rob Johnson@rjson.bsky.social · 4mo ago

Just one example on how the trajectory of a single headline rate has affected urban areas very differently. Some places it hasn't really altered the bottom of the local Labour market. Others, more and more workers are being brought within touching distance.

Courts ruling that wholly different jobs should be paid the same ignore economic realities. Increases cost & uncertainty for business. Will raise costs for all. If govt really, genuinely cares about economic growth and cost of living they’d amend the legislation. www.thetimes.com/article/51e0...

Equal pay claims ignore economic reality

Court cases seeking equal pay for work of equal value have become so surreal they will end up hurting everyone except the lawyers

thetimes.com

Important thread. I’d assumed appointments must have happened by now. But no national statistician for a year and no chair of UKSA for almost as long is not good. This may not be the key issue, but I have written about the potential costs of offering v uncompetitive salaries for these posts.

Hetan Shah@hetanshah.bsky.social · 5mo ago

Good data is essential for policy. Today it’s been a year since we had a permanent National Statistician. No news on what is happening with the current recruitment which began Oct 2025. This is an under the bonnet issue that points to state failure 🧵 uksa.statisticsauthority.gov.uk/news/stateme...