cranky ol’ Auncle Allie

@turtlesoup.bsky.social

Cartoonist, illustrator, fanperson. Budding professional science writer & hobby naturalist/nature photographer. They/them. http://linktr.ee/alliekleber Expect lots of bird photos (and sometimes plants, bugs, etc). GenAI is not welcome here.

Two things that are true: 1) It's awful for trans people if the Republicans wins the midterms. 2) It's awful for trans people if Democrats become anti-trans rights, and we have 2 anti-trans parties, like the UK. Why do so many people arguing 1) seemingly have such a hard time understanding 2) ?

Let's not have a primary election, the biggest moving day of the year, and a bunch of rain all on the same day ever again, okay? Especially with the bonus ongoing road work on a major street. My commute is short, but it was also ... pretty damn harrowing today. 🚴🫣

Yesterday I took myself to Boston's Pleasure Bay to see the razorbill (an Arctic puffin relative) that has mysteriously been hanging out there. Very chill guy, nice to meet. Was rather amused by all the beachgoers who didn't notice what looked like a small penguin floating right on by. #birds 🪶

A razorbill in scruffy, fading breeding plumage raising itself up out of the water to flap its wings vigorously. It's a small, stocky ocean bird, black head and back and white underside, with a rounded, almost teardrop-shaped bill.The razorbill floating contentedly in its stomach in the gently rippling water, head tilted up, little tail pointed up, as well as the wingtips. White feathers are starting to come in on its chin.The razorbill, still floating, with its bead turned to the side and its eye just slightly open.Pulled out view showing a little section of city beach, with people lounging around on blankets and in beach chairs, talking to one another or looking at their phones. In front of them, the small razorbill floats just a few feet out into the water.

My temper always manages to run ahead of my better intentions. I'm not taking back my earlier threads or anything; I stand by them! But I need to remember to step away from the internet when I've had my say instead of chasing the topic around and stoking the anger too high.

Back to your regularly (ha) scheduled nature posting ... I had the opportunity to spend some quality time with one of my more elusive favorite #birds at my little local sanctuary on Wednesday night; a belted kingfisher (or perhaps that should be QUEENfisher). 🪶❤️

A belted kingfisher perched in a beech(?) tree, body turned away from the viewer and head tilted, looking down. She's a compact blue bird with a large, triangular head and beak, a large white spot at the front corner of her eye, black tips to her wings, a thick white collar and a white belly.The belted kingfisher, now perched on lichen-crusted dead branches hanging amid maple leaves, her body turned to the side and head towards the viewer. Some of her eponymous red "belt" markings can be seen peeking from uner her folded wing.The female belted kingfisher perched in profile on a thick dead tree branch, staring down with her beak slightly open. The red markings at the side of her breast and belly are more visible, and the blue collar between the thick white one and her white front.The female belted kingfisher perched in a willow tree at a three-quarter angle, peering downward with her wings sticking downward in neat little triangles at her sides.

I can't get over this. It's such a stark illustration of the huge cultural disparity between Cleves' field and Walden's. Cleves made blatantly false claims, while Walden's citations were more than impeccable. The assumptions all went the other way.

Dave Kamper@dskamper.bsky.social · 3mo ago

It's only ironic if you discount the existence of credibility. Rachel Hope Cleeves is an established scholar with a strong record. I find her first-person statement fully credible.

This is frankly astonishing to me. The author of the blog post does truly extensive analysis, and it's an interesting read start to finish, but it's quickly apparent that Cleves has so blatantly misrepresented Walden's research and citation practices that it approaches bald-faced lying.

thene@thene.bsky.social · last mo.

out it goes: my long post about Rachel Hope Cleves's claim that Tillie Walden plagiarised her book. It's long because Cleves's claim is much, much more bizarre than it looked on first reading. I'm not going to bury the lede here. Cleves's claim does not hold up. buttondown.com/thene/archiv...

"Why am I awake?" -me, and probably also this (immature, I think) Great Horned Owl who flew across my path last Saturday afternoon. I think it had been mobbed by songbirds. (Photo has been cropped - I took it from a careful and respectful distance.) 🦉 #birds 🪶

A young great horned owl perched on a lichen-speckled, forked branch against a backdrop of out-of-focus oak leaves. Its back is to the viewer, but its head is turned nearly all the way around, and tilted upwards; it has a single small feather sticking horizontally out from its head by one "horn" (tuft). It's a mottled brown all over, its eye discs more reddish, and it has huge yellow eyes and a small, curved black beak.

"Do you ... plan on being homosexual in the future?" Very young guy, very awkward, not originally from the US but I don't remember details. Circa 2012 or so; the same appointment included a mildly traumatizing pap smear experience. 😬 I didn't go to a doctor for awhile after that.

Heather Hill@rollin-academic.bsky.social · 2mo ago

A question from Reddit that I'll answer here: "What's the most unhinged thing a doctor has said to you with a straight face?"

I'm having such a hard time being present here. I wish there were an easy way to filter my feed so I could more easily catch up on friends' lives instead of wading through a million reskeets. Promoting art and books and important news is important but I am burned out and have almost zero bandwidth.