"Lead" doing a lot of heavy lifting here in the new AI Minister's reminiscences of how these #onlinesafety amendments ended up on statute book. Certainly likely to come as a surprise to civil society #VAWG campaigners, cross-party MPs and Peers and, erm, his colleagues in the Home Office. #iykyk
Maeve Walsh
@maevewalsh.bsky.social
Policy & Govt Relations consultant | Director, #OnlineSafetyAct Network | Trustee | Ex-Civil Servant | #FRSA | London-Irish
A governance model that just waits for powerful individuals to change their minds is doomed. Governments need to start listening to other people.
Tech leaders are not 'changing their minds' about AI. They're being forced to admit things they previously didn't want to.
Dolly Parton in Paídi Ó Sé's, Co Kerry, Ireland, 1990. RIP
Dolly Parton in Paídi Ó Sé's Pub
YouTube video by paidiosekerry
youtube.com
If the purported No10 Bluesky account isn’t genuine, it does rather underline one of the problems of govt not having an established presence here- namely that it creates a vacuum for others to try and fill to impersonate them!
Ofcom unable to take further legal action against suicide forum www.bbc.co.uk/news/article... Take out the trash day? Absolutely not, Ofcom never even watched that episode
This. Also for big tech / social media co.s too. A single (always open) door into Govt for tech lobbyists means conversations about growth/sector support are also opps to argue against accountability/ regulation. This is the conflict at the heart of DSIT (and previously in "D is for digital" DCMS).
In principle, it could be productive for (e.g.) AI governance to be handled by a Dept that does not see its primary duty as advocating for and seeking to grow the AI sector. An expanded DBT could still consider the interests of UK tech, without centring them at potential cost to others. (3/?)
absolute classic "I am 50 years old and have run large chunks of government and the boss has told us we have to listen this child on an away day" look
Thanks to @zoecrowther.bsky.social @politicshome.bsky.social for covering our call - backed by dozens of our partners - calling on the new PM to deliver a more ambitious approach to #onlinesafety and #AI policy and regulation. Full statement here: www.onlinesafetyact.net/analysis/onl...
Online safety: the opportunities ahead for the new Prime Minister
This joint statement has been signed by 47 of our Network partners, who are listed below. The past six months have brought debates about children’s online safety to the very heart of British life and ...
onlinesafetyact.net
EXC: A coalition of charities, campaign groups, and academics has urged Andy Burnham to strengthen online safety laws if he enters No10 47 organisations said in a statement that the govt's approach to online safety has been "fragmented and slow" and a new PM should be an opportunity for a reset
Exc: A coalition of charities, campaign groups, researchers & academics has urged Burnham to strengthen online safety laws when he enters No 10 A statement led by the Online Safety Network calls on Burnham to bring in new legislation that'd be regularly updated to keep pace with evolving technology
Dozens Of Organisations Urge Burnham To Strengthen Online Safety Laws
Exclusive: A coalition of charities, campaign groups, researchers and academics has urged Andy Burnham to strengthen online safety laws if, as expe...
politicshome.com
“Tech isn’t exceptional. Abiding by the product safety requirements found in every other industrial sector should be the norm.” @maevewalsh.bsky.social Precisely. The huge mistake we made w/ the internet/social media was abandoning a duty of care. Instead of age gating, let’s ensure accountability.
A ban is a symbolic reset, writes Maeve Walsh of the Online Safety Act Network, but treating social media harms as a product safety failure—not just age-gating and hoping for the best—gets at the root, and it's already doable under the UK’s existing Online Safety Act.
A ban is a symbolic reset, writes Maeve Walsh of the @osanetwork.bsky.social, but treating social media harms as a product safety failure—not just age-gating and hoping for the best—gets at the root, and it's already doable under the UK’s existing Online Safety Act.
The New UK Prime Minister Inherits a Social Media Ban. The Real Goal Is Safety by Design.
Embedding safety by design is the only way to ensure substantive reduction of harms, argues Online Safety Act Network director Maeve Walsh.
buff.ly
The case for decisive action to address the harms created by social media platforms has been successfully made by children, parents, safety campaigners and many others. But the Government’s announcement today does them a disservice. 1/5
Wild that the Tories' Laura Trott has told #R4today "we tried policing content and it didn't work" as a reason for backing an all-out ban. There were plenty of people calling on the then Conservative government *not to make the #onlinesafetyact all about content* but they apparently knew best. 🤷🏻♀️
Under 16s to be banned from social media, and a white supremacist who fuels riots on our streets, still allowed to run a whole platform.
Until we see the details of what's in, what's out and how *it* (gestures vaguely at politically motivated, headline-grabbing mess) will be implemented, this from Emily Darlington is your must-read primer. #socialmedia #onlinesafetyact www.politico.eu/article/soci...
I’m a mum. Here’s why banning social media for under 16s won’t work.
I want kids to be safe online, but I don’t believe an Australia-style outright ban is the solution.
politico.eu
So X is poisonous enough to keep our kids from but still the preferred app of communication by government departments? Many have said it but I'll say it again: WTA yellow rubbery F?
🚨 NEW: Under-16s in the UK will be banned from the following 10 social media apps TikTok YouTube Snapchat Instagram X Reddit Facebook Twitch Kick Threads
Prospect union - which represents civil service comms staff - has called on the Govt to leave X saying Govt use of it "legitimises it as a platform, and also results in civil service communications officers having to wade through racist content while doing their jobs." bectu.org.uk/news/prospec...
Prospect calls for the Government to leave X
Following ongoing political interference and the promotion of far right content on Elon Musk's social media platform...
bectu.org.uk
We are proud to join over 100 organisations and campaigners standing with Jess Asato MP in her significant, and brave, step to seek accountability from xAI, not just for herself but the countless women and girls harmed, as reported in @the-independent.com: 1/5 www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/poli...
More than 100 campaigners back MP suing Elon Musk’s xAI over deepfake images of her
Exclusive: Jess Asato says the support she has received ‘feels like a shout for women’s freedom on the internet’
independent.co.uk
It's time for Labour to deliver on the promise made in Opposition to revise the Online Safety Act to address exactly this (and put back in everything else the Tories removed from the legislation that might have helped the mess we're in now.) A promise made by ... erm ... Lucy Powell.
This is not going to get any disagreement on here. I simply note, the post Southport riots and Musk's fanning of them was almost *two years ago*. Yet, if Labour is going to start taking Musk's assault on our democracy and society seriously then great. www.theguardian.com/politics/202...
Labour defending Twitter is a good example of why they are so ineffective in government: utterly unwilling to take decisions which have any controversy attached.
Lammy says he doesn't think the Govt should come off X because that's where a lot of people get their information. FFS.
I know I've talked about this before, but I do think the secret for progressive politics in the UK is unlocking the power of the capable, liberal, pissed-off middle-aged woman. One of worst things about McSweeneyism has been the tedious, boarish sexism that pushed through tedious, illiberal policies
If the government wants to tackle the "online breeding ground of antisemitism" why on earth are Keir Starmer, the government and @heidialexander.bsky.social still posting on X? www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/cw...
Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg: Labour minister says government needs to tackle online 'breeding ground' of antisemitism
Shortly, we'll also hear from Tory leader Kemi Badenoch and Green Party leader Zack Polanski ahead of next week's elections.
bbc.co.uk
@ofcom.bsky.social Chair job spec: a particular focus is #onlinesafety Successful candidate (according to @financialtimes.com): no relevant experience. Hard to see the logic, esp when #DSIT SofS has spent months berating the regulator over #onlinesafetyact enforcement www.ft.com/content/bdcc...
@ofcom.bsky.social Chair job spec: a particular focus is #onlinesafety Successful candidate (according to @financialtimes.com): no relevant experience. Hard to see the logic, esp when #DSIT SofS has spent months berating the regulator over #onlinesafetyact enforcement www.ft.com/content/bdcc...
And the House of Lords agreed: Baroness Kidron's amendment passed and now goes to the Commons. 👇🏼
'Tech companies must be criminally liable for harmful chatbots' ✍️ @maevewalsh.bsky.social for LBC Opinion
Tonight, the documentary, Molly vs. The Machines will be shown at 9pm on Channel 4. It tells the heartbreaking story of Molly Russell who tragically took her own life aged just 14 after viewing harmful content online. Molly’s story, as told by her family and friends, is not an isolated one. 1/
Our initial response to the Government's consultation on children's #onlinesafety, which is due to be published later this morning. More to follow once we've seen the detail. 👉🏼 www.onlinesafetyact.net/analysis/res...