Asier Moneva

@asiermoneva.com

Criminologist | Researcher in cybercrime @nscr-instituut.bsky.social & The Hague University of Applied Sciences | Co-Chair @opencriminology.bsky.social 💬: 🇬🇧🇪🇸🇳🇱 📍: Amsterdam - The Hague

You can't swing a metaphorical cat on the internet without stumbling across a heated debate about bias in policing. But what does the research actually tell us? And, perhaps more importantly, what can't it tell us? Our new paper takes stock of the evidence. 🧵

Stealing a phone and poaching a lizard: same logic? Criminology’s ‘hot product’ frameworks (CRAVED, VIVA) are widely used to explain which wildlife gets targeted. We show why they fail as a simple additive checklist. Now open access in Conservation Biology: doi.org/10.1111/cobi...

A critical reflection on the application of hot product frameworks to explain the target selection of wildlife products

The application of hot product frameworks, such as value, inertia, visibility, and accessibility (VIVA) and concealable, removable, available, (abundance and accessibility), valuable, enjoyable, and ...

doi.org

Metacheck is now hosted by Surf! This offers us the possibility to offer an all in one online solution. Before we advertise this more, we would love to trial the new tool with data managers and editors of Diamond open access journals who want to try out automated checks. Especially of data and code.

New preprint! Universities increasingly expect academics to practise open science. But is it rewarded when hiring? We analysed 1,356 academic job ads from Norwegian institutions and found that <5% of ads mentioned open science as a required or desired qualification osf.io/preprints/ps...

Alluvial diagram of 1,352 Norwegian academic job ads, flowing from research field to whether the ad mentioned open science. Almost all flow goes to “No”, with only a thin stream from each field to “Yes”. The share mentioning open science was 2.2% of 93 Humanities ads, 3.5% of 431 Life Sciences & Biomedicine ads, 4.8% of 168 Physical Sciences ads, 6.3% of 381 Social Sciences ads, and 4.7% of 279 Technology ads. Differences between fields were not statistically significant

SocArXiv now has a limit of two papers per week. If authors submit more than that we assume they are LLM-generated and reject them all. Normal humans who need to upload a batch of papers, which sometimes happens, must make arrangements. Also today, ArXiv set a two papers per month limit.

Fair Moderation, Equitable Access, and AI: arXiv’s Updated Rate Limit Policy

arXiv, and the scientific community at large, are facing a watershed moment. Scholarly publishing is currently changing at a rapid pace, and we are seeing a…

blog.arxiv.org

13. Hence our dismal conclusion: rather than finding that LLMs free us to do a better job of what we were doing before they came along, they shift scientific incentives (and the playing field of academic competition) in ways that compel us to do more and more, faster and faster, less and less well.

After a little break due to busy schedules Nullius in Verba will be back with a new podcast episode later today! We will discuss when and how artificial intelligence and automation can improve the way we do science. Keep an eye on your podcast players!

📢 Nominations are open for the 2026 Open Criminology Award! Recognising outstanding contributions. 🆕 New for 2026: 🏆 ECR Award (€1,500) 🏆 Established Researcher Award (€2,000)* 📅 Deadline: 16 July 2026 🔗 esc-enoc.github.io/open-crim-aw... #OpenCriminology #OpenScience *Subject to final agreement.

Open Criminology Award – European Network for Open Criminology

This document describes the terms of reference of the Open Criminology Awards of the European Network for Open Criminology (ENOC)

esc-enoc.github.io

The idea is a target article, followed by invited and submitted peer-reviewed commentaries representing diverse perspectives, with the original authors given a right of reply. The goal is to open up space for discussion on how we can get Open Research to work for everyone. Any takers?