Mohan J Dutta

@mohanjdutt.bsky.social

@mohanjdutt.bsky.social "Name racism here, & you will be told you are divisive, that you are importing someone else’s culture war.. that this is not who we are...It is not impolite to name racism... What is impolite is telling a New Zealander of 30 years to go home" e-tangata.co.nz/comment-and-...

We must name racism when it happens | E-Tangata

"It is not impolite to name racism, to document it, or to organise against it. What is impolite is telling a New Zealander of 30 years to go home. What is indecent is a cabinet that shelters him." — M...

e-tangata.co.nz

A new scholarly article I co-authored is out at the Quarterly Journal of Speech. If you like reading communication theory and thinking about how to apply it to confront groups like Patriot Front, this article is for you.

Parasitism reconsidered: far-right relationality and the rhetoric of Patriot Front

ABSTRACT
Taking an alternative theoretical route to the study of far-right and white nationalist rhetoric, this essay extends extant literature by attending the forms of relationality fashioned in the rhetoric of Patriot Front in order to make a more robust claim regarding white nationalist relationality more broadly. Such a focus on relationality, we contend, offers important lessons for scholars of far-right rhetoric, as well as for rhetorical theorists of the public. Specifically, we hope to extend Larson and McHendry's notion of parasitic publics using Michel Serres’ work on the semantic possibilities of parasitism as a way of theorizing human relationality and of assembling the public world. Doing so nuances our understanding of parasitism and relationality, suggesting that what should be of primary concern are the ethical frameworks of our relationality. While the relationality of Patriot Front and white nationalism more generally is hostile towards difference and premised upon a logic of linearity and identity, a radically democratic relationality might instead be based upon a logic of becoming and be thankful for and hospitable to difference. The theoretical ambit of the parasite holds room for both possibilities, demanding ethical choice on behalf of the public itself.

Yup @sean-phelan.bsky.social the vacuousness of Labor and Spinoff, while performing centrist liberalism, and selling all the culturalist nonsense.

Sean Phelan@sean-phelan.bsky.social · 3w ago

Totally justified takedown of the overrated and self-regarding Spinoff by @mohanjdutt.bsky.social For a notionally "liberal" media outlet, its coverage of the Modi visit mirrors the lack of thought we see in the gushing social media posts of the Labour party MPs #nzpol

The discipline of distinguishing Hinduism, which filled that arena with legitimate joy, from Hindutva, the political production that harvested it. A multiculturalism worthy of the name, 1 that engages minority communities as internally plural & politically alive, with their own struggles over power.

Mohan J Dutta@mohanjdutt.bsky.social · 3w ago

I have often said this. I find liberals performing “let’s sing kumbaya” whiteness to be some of the greatest enablers in the rise of fascism. Here’s my analysis of The Spinoff’s coverage of Kia Ora Modi. culture-centered.blogspot.com/2026/07/beau...

When civil servants fuck up they should be held "accountable" as everyone – and not least the far right – likes to say. But maybe the always on-brand Peters has been road-testing local variations of "lock her up" at the NZ First focus groups #nzpol www.stuff.co.nz/politics/360...

Winston Peters says government officials who mislead ministers should be ‘put in prison’

The foreign minister says government officials who mislead ministers should be “put in prison”.

stuff.co.nz