Dmytro Mishkin

@ducha-aiki.bsky.social

Marrying classical CV and Deep Learning. I do things, which work, rather than being novel, but not working. http://dmytro.ai

Agents finally brought the promise of all data labeling companies failed to deliver - you can label a little of data, new model/alg is trained on them and helps you more and more. The labeling is becoming adaptive as well. I love this

The best and the worst work for the agents is speed optimizations. Best - because it is well defined and easy to climb leaderboard. Worst - because you cannot use agent swarm, as the timings would be unreliable.

TIL - unlike Python - bash reads scripts incrementally. ``` echo "Starting..." sleep 30 # Change this before the sleep finishes, and the new message will be printed. echo "Finished!" ```

Example questions: (1) What papers look like after AI (2) What is would look like for a positive society-wide benefit from AI (3) What job training looks like if tasks become easier Trying to work through my own vision and it's nice to assemble others

T

A lesson from decades of work on automation is that autonomous systems require continual monitoring and human oversight. System designers never(*) succeed in anticipating all of the ways that a system can fail.

New, not so slop AI pop science video on YouTube. Kind of reasonable topic and not terrible delivery, didn’t even saw to “ai content” stamp. Next video topic helped me though: “Why we are eating tilapia and not carp?” WTF you mean not eating carp? Will stick to Veritasium

It is always tempting to add "consistency loss term" in 3D in one way or another. Do not do it. If it helps, then your data is too small, or you are predicting disconnected outputs. Just clf/regress vs ground truth, and do it long enough.

Sadly, I don’t monitor arXiv anymore. I don’t even read Scholar Inbox suggested papers, although I am still going to read VidMap carefully. If you subscribed to me for the arXiv feed only, probably unsubscribe.

Nihar Shah did a heroic experiment for TMLR: he spent 20-25 hours over two weeks interviewing authors of seemingly low-quality submissions about their own papers. He confirmed what we all suspected: people submitting these papers have *no idea* what is going on in them.

Transactions on Machine Learning Research@tmlrorg.bsky.social · 4w ago

TMLR has faced a deluge of submissions, necessitating stricter desk rejection policies due to limited reviewer capacity Co-EiC Nihar Shah reached out to authors of 10 papers slated for desk reject. Could they answer questions about their *own* submission? medium.com/@TmlrOrg/ask...

Yeah the booklet would have been a lot better. Conference apps can be good, but Cvent is not. It's slow, the UI is terrible and it crashes on my phone when listing sessions. And the ECCV website is not better. 🤷🏻‍♂️

A robot moves hook from A to B and we measure battery drain (assuming perfect operation). Hook catches 50kg bag of rice. Stupid robot continues to pull hook and bag, while clever one untangles and proceeds w/o bag. Is there metric/formula for taking stupidity into account?