Ben Helms

@benjaminhelms.bsky.social

Assistant Professor of International Affairs, Bush School, Texas A&M. Previously: Postdoctoral Fellow at Carnegie Mellon University. PhD from UVA. benjaminhelms.com

I wrote a short piece for @casipenn.bsky.social exploring the likely domestic political consequences of India's continued integration with the world economy. Based on two articles published @ajpseditor.bsky.social, coauthored with Junghyun Lim.

Center for the Advanced Study of India@casipenn.bsky.social · 2mo ago

"Nativist Backlash and “Left-Behind” Areas: What India’s Trade Agreements Mean for its Political Economy" by @benjaminhelms.bsky.social (Bush School of Government and Public Service) casi.sas.upenn.edu/iit/benjamin...

1/🧵 Judges across ideological lines are ruling against Trump at strikingly similar rates (84% liberal, 86% centrist, 82% conservative). This isn't partisan opposition to Trump—it's the judiciary functioning as intended by cutting across partisan lines to uphold the Constitution.

Title: Both Liberal and Conservative Judges Rule Against Trump
Description: A scatter plot showing the rulings of judges against or in favor of Trump, categorized by ideology using the DIME score. The x-axis represents Judge Ideology (DIME Score), ranging from liberal (-1) to conservative (1), and the y-axis represents the case outcome (against or for Trump).
	•	Blue dots represent liberal judges, purple dots represent moderate judges, and red dots represent conservative judges.
	•	Some judges are labeled, including Rudolph Contreras, Lauren King, John Coughenour, and James Emanuel Boasberg on the liberal to moderate side, and Carl Nichols, Richard J. Leon, and Joseph N. Laplante on the conservative side.
	•	A note mentions that Boasberg, though slightly right-leaning, was initially appointed by George W. Bush.
	•	The visualization suggests that judges from both ideological backgrounds ruled against Trump.

🚨Why do people turn out less in some places than others, even in compulsory voting systems?🚨 In our new paper, forthcoming at BJPS, we highlight the role of migratory turnover in increasing voting costs for communities and test it using new municipal panel data from Brazil.

Bild

"By extending temporary protection to certain people who are already here and giving them the opportunity to work, TPS is a smart and humane way to improve the lives of people living here and abroad." Check out my piece on TPS with David Leblang and Tom Jawetz with CNN www.cnn.com/2023/10/05/o...

Opinion: A smart and humane answer on immigration | CNN

The Biden administration’s Temporary Protected Status (TPS) program is a humane policy that will improve the lives of people living here and abroad, write authors Ben Helms, David Leblang and Tom Ja...

cnn.com

The Biden administration has extended TPS to more Venezuelans, offering them legal labor market access in the US. In research with David Leblang, we find that TPS helps migrants send remittances home, and if anything, reduces subsequent migration. www.nytimes.com/2023/09/20/n...

U.S. Will Allow Nearly 500,000 Venezuelan Migrants to Work Legally

The move, announced late Wednesday, followed intense lobbying by New York Democrats before and during President Biden’s visit to New York City this week.

nytimes.com